Ya if only Hillary could change the rules to her advantage, she'd be ahead.

And if only States with the work "NEW" in it counted, Hillary would be cruising.

It would be more telling to show the map of supports, couties that HRC won, compared to counties BO won, in primary states such as Ohio. HRC wiped out BO in Texas and Ohio. BO ended up gaining more delegates in Texas after losing essentially all counties, only because of the fundamentally flawd, undemocratic system of the so-called Democratic party. Thomas Jefferson probably is knocking his grave to come back to life to teach this bunch of idiots what one-person-one-vote means.

This nevertheless tells something about who is elitist, and who is connected to voters. It also shows the so-called delegates won by BO are just as phony as he is.

Lazy makes a point, but let's take it a bit farther.

How about all the states whose borders are formed at right angles be disqualified, excepting of course States with the word "New" in their names.

We should also disqualify states that start with the letter "W". "W" is bad after all because its the nickname of the current occupant of the whitehouse.

Oh ya, Caucus states are bad too, because the candidate that is the most likeable, with the most committed supporters and the best run organization wins.

These factors make Caucuses unfair. And so we should discount the Caucus states as well.

After some caucus states start with "W" and have borders form with right angles. THese states are doubly super bad and should not count.

There are at least things that should be changed.

1. The electoral college is out-dated, and incompatible with every aspect of life and technology of the 21st centuray. The constitution needs be amended.

2. The Democratic party had better get this act together to make its system of primary elections consistent with the general election.

If Obama can't win Penn, it proves again and again, he just can't win big states and just can win over white vote..

All he won so far are most black or red states because of his skin color and street organizor experience for caucus..

Tina, I agree...They are as bad as the worst of the Republicans...they'd fit right in.

Tina - if Clintons were republicans, it would have left the Democratic party with only one one-term president since LBJ. What a pity, it is so easy for you to forget. Perhaps, you are too young to remember.

Why are they always talking about changing the rules? Accept the rules, the Democratic party came up with them and you are Democrats aren't you?
Ridiculous to start talking about "only if...." The Clintons are trying to delegitimize the process and that is a slap in the face to the Democratic party.

AND GOP IS SO STUPID THAT THEY WOULD PREFER HILLARY AS THIER OPPONENT THAN OBAMA?

Bill thinks he was able to fool people once with his infamous lie people can be foold over and over.

Republicans want to run against Hillary because they think they have a better chance of winning. This morning Pat Buchanan said he thinks Obama would win against McCain. Republicans don't really like McCain

I trusted you once when you fooled me with your infamous lie.....but SORRY NOT ANYMORE...specially when you are campaigning for another liar like you.

Commander - Caucuses are fundamentally flawed and undemocratic because they do not allow, literally speaking, and do not give equal chance for all voters to participate, to vote. I have no problem with activists participation and enthusiam. The problem is that there is only this narrow 1 hour window, in the middle of night, such that workers at that shift do not have a chance. Older persons are too afraid to drive in the dark. Parents cannot leave kids home alone, or the police will go after them. and... I can go on to name 10 more reasons.

Obama got a bunch of 18 years old - nothing wrong with it, although they only knew he looks "cool" - to come out. If you can count on them coming out a second time, wait until the general election to see what percentage you will get.

right! I think she is better off in the republican negative ad machine... "If she does not like the heat, she should get out of the kitchen!" If she does not like the rules, move to republicans!

yeah, she'd be ahead by as many pledged delegates as Obama is now! If this is such a huge lead in Bill's hypothetical situation, why is it not such a huge lead in reality. The answer: because any situation where Hillary is losing is obviously incorrect!

Well it's not too late for Hillary to get out and change to the republican party,I hear McCain is looking for a vice president running mate. I think she would be much happier anyway. Please do the Democrats a favor!

McCain/Clinton 08!

I think president Clinton is right. Democrat party should change the rule in 2012 like republican to reflect with the general election. It is good for the party because the winner has more time to prepare for the general election.

If the Clintons are so obsessed with winning under republican rules, why not then just run for office as a republican? She sure sounds like one anyway. These two are unbelievable!

It always sounds funny to hear from the Clintons. If the rules are not in their favor, they are bad. And if they are in their favor they are then the best!

First it was popular vote, then big state then winner takes all, then Electoral Votes, now GOP system.

I have better idea:

Clinton's Enron election math!
1. If you don't count states with caucuses, she is winning almost as many states.

2. If you don't count delegates that were allocated by caucus, she is almost winning in delegates.
3. If you count states where SHE WAS THE ONLY ONE ON THE BALLOT, she is winning the popular vote! (Not anymore, She is waiting for PA, and then this claim be reinvented)
4. If you count Electoral Votes ONLY she is winning.
5. if you only count on Saturdays she is winning.
6. If you only count her delegates, she is winning.

So there you see, Hillary Clinton is winning.