David -- why would Hillary lower herself to Obama's (aka Soetoro's) level by being his vice-president.

I think he'll pick Cindy Sheehan as his VP to reflect the true new democratic party.

Kenneth

Sound's like Nader is your guy.

Why should Clinton answer for Obama's buddy Wright?

What really gets me mad is that I just watched the MSNBC show hosted by ANDREA MITCHELL

AND SHE HAD ON WASHINGTON POST REP JONATHAN K. PARK I THINKS THATS HIS NAME.... AND REV JOE WATKIN A BLACK REPUBLICAN BOTH TALKING ABOUT REV WRIGHT WELL FIRST OF I HATE IT WHEN CABLE NEWS SHOW THINK THAT JUST BECAUSE THESE GUYS ARE BLACK THEY SPEAK FOR ALL BLACK PEOPLE WELL THEY DON'T..

REV WRIGHT SPEECH TODAYS WAS GREAT..WELL AMERICAN YOU WANTED TO OPEN THE RACE CAN OF WORMS WELL NOW YOU GOT IT.

THESE BLACK NEWS PUNDITS PEOPLE DO NOT SPEAK FOR THE MAJORITY OF BLACK PEOPLE WHO UNDERSTANDS SLAVERY AND UNDERSTAND REV WRIGHT.

BESIDE REV JOE WATKINS IS NOW SPEAKING FOR HIS CHURCH..HE BETTER WATCH OUT.

AND ISN'T REV JOE WATKINS SUPPOSE TO NOT JUDGE AFTER ALL HE'S A REV.

A

I think Obama is done for. He won't win Indiana, and if he does win N.C. it will be close. I belive he won't win N.C. even with 38% of the Dem. party which happens to be blacks. It's a shame Obama is not a bad candidate he just kept the wrong friends around.

Now why should Clinton not tip toe around the Rev Wright issue, its Obama's mess so let him clean it up, this had nothing to do with Hillary.

According to Wright Obama is telling the public what he needs to tell them to get elected, again there is no need for Hillary to comment.

Its a black thing and for Hillary to comment you folks may say she is racists, so let the Obama camp and Obama supporters deal with their clean ups, they can disown Wright or not but whatever they do the will have to face the outcome of Wrights fall out.

The Clintons did not turn to Wright during his impeachment -- he was invited to an annual meeting of religious leaders which occurred at the same time as the Starr report was being released. "Turning to" would imply personal connection,"invited to" does not. If you now want to accuse the Clintons of accepting Wright in one instance and rejecting him in another, feel free. But, do remember that actions in the White House often reflect the views of constituents just as much as the individual office holder, so pls walk the line carefully when you explain how the president should have not included a pastor/leader of one of the larger black churches in the US b/c of personal differences. [Which is what HRC identified in her response to a direct question.]

As for HRC "surrogates" -- if you don't believe the premise that Obama should have to answer for Wright's comments, than don't play the game of extending the same irrational line of questioning to people even more removed from the principals. Compare HRC / Obama, fine --- saying that you have to look to secondary/tertiary/etc relationships is just ridiculous. That's akin to playing "6 degrees"...

I agree now that there is no way hillary clinton can stick Obama on the ticket as VP.

All of his non electablity issues will follow them around .

He was a great pick as VP , but now he is a total liability.

David: you guys need to wake up and realize this race is over.  So Indiana and North Carolina, you can vote for someone who has already lost or you can vote for Obama who already has won this race.

I keep hearing there is a race for popular vote.  If there is a race for popular vote, how do you count caucus states (i.e Alaska, Washington State, etc.) where there are no true popular numbers ?  So to me the popular vote rhetoric cannot be used by the super delegates in deciding this race.  Truly superdelegates should take a look at the delegate counts.  Both candidates will beat John McCain, so electability shouldn't be an issue.  Infact on the issue of electability,  the Republicans appear to prefer to run against Hillary, than Obama.  

Bottom line, the Democratic Party has it's Presidential Candidate.  It is Obama.  He has won the most pledged delegates, he has won the most states, and given the fact that there is no true way of deciphering popular vote received by some of the caucus states it is unusable.   Regardless of the outcome of North Carolina and Indiana,  Obama has already won the Democratic primary for 2008.   The sooner people realize this, the sooner the party can mend and we move forward against the Republicans.  To vote for Hillary is like the Republicans still voting for Huckabee...   It means nothing..

I'm sick of seeing Obama and Clinton tear each other apart. McCain is the real enemy. When are these two democratic candidates going to start attacking him in earnest? I'm an Obama supporters, yes he does have problems with white blue collar voters in the rust belt and southern states. Both he and Clinton have almost identical platforms. I think they should both be on the same ticket. What do you all say, Obama/Clinton'08

Wright is open for the nod for VP maybe Obama should give him a call

Shawn - Obama can't put someone on the ticket who would energize Republicans and bring negatives of 53 to the race.

There's more at stake than the White House. With Clinton anywhere on the ticket, the Democrats risk losing Congress, too.

Becky

You fail to understand politics and super delegates and what the interest of the party is. WINNING is the GAME.
You can't hold on to a looser. Imagine if someone found out that Obamas was a murderer and they found the bodies and the smokeing gun. Do you believe the super delegates would give it to him . NO

David: That is a tall reach don't you think?? LOL

I'd like to see Tony Zinni as running mate. Richardson is obviously a short-lister, and maybe Sebellius, too. Mark Warner would be an interesting pick. And let's not forget Rendell - don't assume he wouldn't accept just because he's helping Clinton now.

All three cadidates stink, nobody should vote and the Reps and Dems should go back and find somebody better...

Becky

Cindy Sheehan would best represent Obama's views and the two of them on the same ticket would mark the advent of the new democratic party.

Becky
Thats an example of why it's not over till the fat ladie sings. Nothing is for sure. Party comes first. Hopefully we can change the system just like the Republicans winner takes all. HRC would of had it by now.

Senator Clinton what fighting did you do again in the 90's? I mean other than fighing members of your own party on your health care plan to feed insurance companies?

I think the Dems should drop both HRC and Obama and nominate Edwards. He will win. They have the power at the convention to do so.