« Previous | Main | Next »

White House Vs. Senate GOP Over Housing Bill

Share

April 08, 2008 3:12 PM

ABC's Z. Byron Wolf reports from Capitol Hill: Republican senators returned from Spring Break with an earful on housing woes and are working with Democrats to push a bill through in record time that would  give aid to communities, lenders and homebuilders and provide more counseling for borrowers at risk of foreclosure.

Moments ago senators invoked cloture with an emphatic vote of 92-6.

But, apparently, no one looped in the White House.

In her opening statement at today's White House briefing,  Spokeswoman Dana Perino gave the bill an emphatic thumbs down, saying it would be counterproductive, do more harm than good, and not be supported by the President.

"The bill will likely do more harm than good by bailing out lenders and speculators, and passing on costs to other Americans who play by the rules and honor their mortgage debt obligations."

And if that's not enough evidence that Republicans aren't on the same page on the housing bill, nobody told Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell the White House didn't like the bill.

Asked by a reporter about Perino's comments, McConnell said, "You're telling me something I was unaware of.  It was unclear that the White House had a stated position yet on this bill. 

"They wouldn't support it," the reporter followed up.

"Yes.  Well, we'll see how the Senate feels about it at 2:15," McConnell said.

The Senate felt good about it, it seems, and the bill moved another step toward passage.

Perino, for her part, said it didn't really matter if the White House supported the bill or not since whatever the Senate passes will meet stiff resistance in the House, where the Democrats in charge have ideas the White House would find even more objectionable than the Senate's.

April 8, 2008 in Veepstakes | Permalink | User Comments (7)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Who were the 6 Senators that voted "No"?

They look like they will be out of a job...LOL!

Posted by: maritza | Apr 8, 2008 3:51:39 PM

In this case George is right. People can't afford to pay their mortgages because the price of homes is too high. Throwing hundreds of billions of dollars of gov money at the problem will just keep the prices high so that the problem hangs on year after year. The taxpayer will pay for this stupidity.

Posted by: NYC | Apr 8, 2008 8:46:58 PM

Once again in an election year, the Republicans are racing to keep up with the Democrats to see who can spend more taxpayer money. Specifically, for a bail out which will encourage more reckless behavior from lenders and borrowers who will now experience no bad consequences for their short-sighted decisions.

Posted by: carl | Apr 9, 2008 10:47:27 AM

Who cares about the housing problem...it's over anyway, there is nothing that can be done. Americans are going to have to do what they always did...look out for themselves. It's over.

Posted by: Carl | Apr 9, 2008 11:11:51 AM

There is no one to blame but the American public who has allowed (for years) politicians to say and do what ever they wanted to in plan sight with little to no since of accountability. THIS IS A REPUBLIC people, your Government will only do what you the people allow it to.

Posted by: Carl P | Apr 9, 2008 12:29:31 PM

A bail out for the building and real estate industry and artificially supporting home prices is not the solution for the housing crisis. The solution to the housing crisis is lower home prices. There are plenty of people that would buy homes at lower prices. The fact is, home prices got disconnected from fundamentals and they are in the process of re-aligning with fundamentals by prices falling to sustainable levels. If there is a debate at all, it should be over who should take the hit for the price correction. Well, here’s a concept: how about the person that said “yes, I’ll buy this overpriced house and I’ll commit to make the payments at x dollars per month” Privatizing profits and socializing risk is wrong. We should not be penalizing the savers and prudent who provide some of the investment dollars that the government needs to borrow in order to operate and pay for more foolish schemes like this. The savers of our society have had their purchasing power decimated, via a falling dollar brought about by a weak Fed that has been giving in to political pressure.


Posted by: Marc | Apr 9, 2008 8:55:19 PM

How about this: The big banks that caused most of this with their greed should pay the whole bill. The executives of these organizations should have ALL their assets seized and turned over to the people who bought houses through misrepresentation - and let the government lend the HOMEOWNERS (not the corporations) the money to pay back the mortgages with to the mortgage companies with employees in charge - not the greed-head execs that messed up this whole thing in the first place; and force government to be responsible enough to REGULATE the housing industry in favor of the average person so this kind of thing does NOT happen again. Democrats are as much to blame as Republicans on this one.

Posted by: dave | Apr 10, 2008 1:54:22 PM

Post a comment