I find you all very interesting. You have one candidate that has followed the rules, then you have one candidate that moves the markers to advantages them in which ever way they see fit. In the mean time you each tear one another apart fighting over the established rules agreed to by ALL candidates?

Go figure that you would destroy your party to satisfy the candidate you fell in love with. We are in the part of the Primary that you have to step back and refocus to win in November.

Sounds to me as if you are ALL willing to bite off your nose to spite your face.
Do you all ever find UNITY or will you allow McCain to run this Country due to your beliefs?

Rules mean nothing if they are changed every time someone does not like them. Clinton is self-serving and basically trying to cheat her way to the nomination. The DNC leadership needs to step up and take charge - as is their job. All these calls to "count the votes" seem just slimy to me. This is a fairness issue, and simply "counting the votes" is not fair as anyone with a conscience can see.

But if you are hellbent on changing the rules, then I alternatively propose we change the rules to make the primaries winner-take-all affairs, change the legal voting age to 60, and allow cats and dogs to vote (their barks and meows need to be heard). In that case, we could REALLY guarantee a Clinton "victory". These alternative rules are just as fair as what Clinton proposed.

Could it be that Hillary is maybe thinking about running as an Independent, seriously now, in the General Election? She's adamant in her support of counting all of the delegates and the voters rights in Florida and Michigan. It stands to reason, that because of her tenacity and endurance in this matter, that her actions speak louder than words in support of the American voter. I feel if she runs as an Independent, unlike Liebermann, Hillary would be a very formidable opponent for McCain and Obama. Is there a time restriction on when she would have to apply in order to run as an Independent? It just seems to me that she has an alterior motive here.

By insisting on rewarding those who break the rules, Hilliary is demanding that the voices of the majority of voters who did abide by the rules be taken away. Do we want to join the ranks of third world countries where the ballot boxes are stuffed by the juntas and machine politicians? thus destroying the will of the people who express their choice by the rules in play at the beginning of the contest. If destroying the will of law-abiding voters is Hilliary's idea of how to run the country, then she has proven that she lacks the judgement, good will, respect for America and the basic qualifications required to handle the leadership of the country. In fact, if she persists in making these unreasonable and lawless demands, I think she should be removed from office as a U.S. Senator.

I am a 43 year old female that started off being torn between someone I thought would be a new change and the first woman president. I definitely at this point do not think this should be Hillary to represent me as a woman. She is setting us back a hundred years. I will cry sexism and say anything to get what I want. Even ask the rules I signed to be broken - this is not about the American votes this is about what I want - when I want it.

Just wondering if you are trying to count all the votes in Florida and Michigan how do you count the people who stayed home because they were told the primary would NOT count? Just wondering...

Well, the memorial day weekend is here-isn't that the beginning of the summer driving season? Does anyone know when the " Idemand an up or down, are ya with us er agin us, vote on the gas tax holiday" is going to take place? Or was that another false promise from the candidate ready to rule on day one?

Same way you count all the people who could not attend the causcuses.

WHO CARES ABOUT THE POPULAR VOTE??!!!!

Delegates determine nominees, nothing else.

I think the DNC needs to have a severe "house cleaning". I think Dean and Pelosi have waaaay to much control and the Super Delegates are a farce! Most of them don't even endorse the way their states voted, so it takes the power out of the American voter. As for Florida and Michigan, they need to rethink their statesmen at the next election....it was their officials that broke the rules and moved up the primary, unfortunately, the good citizens of Michigan and Florida are having to pay the price.

I am trying to understand how you get to where you think you overturn the outcome by disregarding the rules? Take the names away for a minute and explain to me why A or B should get the nod. I could care if this is either candidate. I am looking for education not snipping. Though you all could explain what is going on without the negatives.

As an Independent without a party I am trying to learn.

DNC will stand by the rules in place.

HRC will cry foul. Claim to be "standing up for the little guy".

See WILL take this to the floor.

Hillary's negative polling #'s 100%

Davie, The gas tax holiday has been written off as an attempt to buy your vote by certain questionable individuals. The Amount you would save would be offset by the price being raised by the oil companys so it wouldnt even amount to a savings. It was all smoke and mirrors, sorry.

If she takes it to the convention now, even after May 31st when her own committee seats half the delegates, she will be finished politically as a Democrat, Independent, or Whig, if you prefer.

@ Texas Voter......by "house cleaning", its evident that Dean and Pelosi both are out of their element in the DNC. They had the power to end this debate weeks ago, but allowed it to go on. As far as the adjective "moronic" you attacked me with, I will not give credence to your opinion.

Super Delegates came to be so that they could vote for whom ever they thought would be the best candidate. Period.

They do not have to vote according to their state.

If they did, what would be the point?

They were appointed Super Del's best of their experience and Party standing.

You keep writing Dean and Pelosi, yet it is the Rules and Bylaws committee that set the... wait for it.... wait for it... RULES!!!!

Who has 15 members in that committee? Yep, you guessed it! CLINTON!!!

Good GOD, just READ!!!!!

Why should a few people at the DNC be more influential than over 2 million voters. That is crazy!

I guess it is Mrs. Clinton who is running for Pres., not Mr. Clinton.

Hopefully, ABC knows the difference.

I find this augments a bit senseless. They ALL agreed not to count MI and FL. They even signed an agreement before the Primary started. So where is the problem the rules committee can seat them as they see fit. I would look for a 50 percent seating. Although you are all disagreeing on something that will NOT matter. They could seat them as voted today and the math doesn't change? Please explain if I am wrong.