« Previous | Main | Next »

Bill Clinton: In Defense of Michigan and Florida

Share

May 16, 2008 1:35 PM

ABC's Sarah Amos Reports: Bill Clinton continues to campaign hard for his wife in the remaining primary states, spending more and more time reiterating the importance of seating the Florida and Michigan delegates.

Today, at the first of five campaign events in Kentucky, just days ahead of the May 20 primary here, the former president said the lack of attention to the unseated Michigan and Florida delegates was proof that the party and the political pundits are trying to force Democrats to get in line behind Obama.

Over the past few days Clinton has frequently focused on the delegate controversy in his campaign remarks, going on about how the primary scheduling flap that resulted in the party and the campaigns' boycotting primaries in those states, has effectively disenfranchised millions of voters.

"What did the Democratic National Committee do? They obliterated them. Who cares if you wanted to get up there with these other states because you've been broken by this economic policy of the current administration. We're gonna show you who's boss. We are obliterating you from the face of the earth and pretending that your voters did not vote. You just have to know, that is the position of your national party. Nobody quarrels with their right to discipline them. They made a decision they did not have to make. And do you seriously believe, if the votes had been the other way, that they would have made the same decision?" Clinton asked a crowd in Owensboro.

The Clinton campaign did not criticize the party's decision to boycott campaigning in Michigan and Florida when the primaries were held in those states.

The former President also continues to spend time on the campaign trail accusing Senator Barack Obama of not following the rules set by the Democratic party in Florida to avoid all campaigning in that state after it moved its primary date ahead in the calendar against the wishes of the partg.  Clinton says that when Obama bought national campaign ads, he did so because he knew they would play in the Florida television market and influence the voters there, despite the party ban on campaigning in the sunshine state.

"Her opponent, now seeking to disembody Florida, buys national cable television and says 'oh, I'm sorry it got into Florida but I had to buy national cable television.' Nobody buys national television for any reason, there is no conceivable reason to do it other than to advertise. And I believe there was also some television in south Georgia. So only one candidate broke the rules.  She still won by 295,000 votes, 17 percent," said Clinton.

Many political observers see the inclusion of Florida and Michigan in the delegate and popular vote totals as the last argument Hillary Clinton has to challenge Obama for the Democratic nomination.

May 16, 2008 in Bush, George W., Hunter, Duncan, Kucinich, Dennis, Tancredo, Tom, Thompson, Fred | Permalink | User Comments (186)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Remember how Chris Cilizza, William Bennett and others were pumping Obama up on CNN and MSNBC? Well, they're doing it for Bush now. Except they refer to Bush as "The President". Told you people; They wanted Obama for Bush. Luckily, Hillary is up 40+ in Kentucky and up in double digets for Puerto Rico. Hillary isn't that far behind in Oregon it's like 10 pts.

Posted by: irma | May 16, 2008 2:44:50 PM

Unless MI and FL votes are considered, there's always going to be an asterisk next to presumptive nominee Obama's name.

Context defines rules ... when the context changes, the rules should too. DNC felt they'd scheduled in such a way that a nominee would be clear early on. That didn't happen. To refuse to seat delegates in the closest race in American politics is ridiculous.

Posted by: Sara | May 16, 2008 2:48:03 PM

Sara, love your "context defines rules"!

Posted by: irma | May 16, 2008 2:51:42 PM

With Obama in the White House God Bless America will not be a phrase, but will become a prayer.

Posted by: informed democrat

Wow, for someone considering themselves a informed democrat, that has to be single handedly the most biased, moronic posting this week. Tell the truth, you're just a republican troll worried about Hillary losing, because Obama going to empty a lot of republican seats if he wins.

Posted by: Larry | May 16, 2008 2:53:54 PM

There's lot that Sen. Barack Obama has in common with George W. Bush. Bill Clinton is abslouetly right to point out that it was always the Republicans who get blamed for this sort of thing, for placing more and more barriers on people's right to vote in a democracy such as ours. Sen. Barack Obama not only manupulated causues with a help of small groups of zealots, but also effectively blocked the re-vote of Florida and Michigan. And when it comes to disenfranchising American voters─ no other person knows more about this subject than our former Vice-President Al Gore. It is ironic we just witnessed the same thing happen to Hillary Clinton, that happened to Al Gore in November 2000. I amazed that the preventing Michigan and Florida vote thus disfranchising millions of Democratic voters reminds me of the Supreme Court Handing over Florida vote to George Bush. In this new era of new politics that's promised by Sen. Obama, can this really happen, or is this politics as usual-- circa Florida 2000? And as usual the whole Washington media establishment was silent, more or less abandoning their responsibility of safeguarding the rights of the people to vote in a democracy such as ours; neglecting their role to say the obvious. The fact that Sen. Obama’s lawyers had successfully block the re-voting of Michigan and Florida. Mr. David Brooks points out in his (3-25-08) column in The New York Times “Obama lawyers successfully prevented re-votes in Florida and Michigan.” This important statement was buried in otherwise as usual pro Obama piece that sees things for Sen. Obama’s favor in an obviously stalemated Democratic primary contest. But what disturbed me was the fact that David Brooks and other political writes in the media establishment seemed to have little regard for democratic process? The more Sen. Obama strains to speak of his new era of politics in America, less and less of it seemed real. Sen. Obama should practice what he preaches so blatantly and the presidential primary campaign is a good place to start…I think Al Gore should endorse Hilly Clinton.

Posted by: charleychaplin | May 16, 2008 2:55:05 PM

Come on Hillary leave the dirty Democrats in the dust, run Independent. They did nothing for me after a lifetime of being one of them. You don't owe them a thing. Hillary or McCain

Posted by: KittyCat | May 16, 2008 2:56:08 PM

UNBELIEVABLE! Hillary agreed to the sanctions when the determination was made by the DNC and now she wants to change the game?!! I too am upset by the delegate loss from MI and FL, but the onus is upon the state party machines for ignoring the warnings from Dean and company if they chose to move their primaries ahead! Let's place the responsibility for this fiasco where it belongs... Any attempt to fairly distribute these delegates now can only damage this party further.

Posted by: doug | May 16, 2008 2:59:12 PM

Remember when Bill was complaining in NH about Obama not getting vetted by the media. He is right afterall...If only these Rev. Wright, Ayers, Rezko issues were brought up before Iowa, Hillary should have been the nominee by this time.

Posted by: Steve K | May 16, 2008 3:00:02 PM

Remember when Bill was complaining in NH about Obama not getting vetted by the media. He is right afterall...If only these Rev. Wright, Ayers, Rezko issues were brought up before Iowa, Hillary should have been the nominee by this time.

Posted by: Steve K | May 16, 2008 3:01:10 PM

The party leadership of Michigan & Florida knew the party rules when they advanced the dates of their primaries. Obama, rightly following the rules didn't even appear on the Michigan ballot. The Democrats, ever spineless, are for some reason terrified of a convention where something is actually decided. Conventions have decided candidates for many years now. They have become so boring of late that they are not worth watching, except perhaps for a few key speeches. Let the process work. Let the primaries be run. Let the Credentials Committee decide if the Democratic Party will follow its own rules. Let the delegates vote. The proceedure has been in place for years now. I'm no Hillary fan but at least she has backbone.

Posted by: Robert A. Pell | May 16, 2008 3:03:11 PM

IF THEY VOTED IT SHOULD BE COUNTED! TO ALL THE OBAMA FANS SHUT THE HELL UP! IF IT WAS THE OTHER WAY AROUND HILL SUPPORTERS WOULD HAVE TO GET OVER IT! REGARDLESS IF HILL LOSES OR WINS THESE PEOPLE GOT OUT AND VOTED AND BET YOUR BUTT IF YOU DON'T COUNT THEM OBAMA OR HILARY WILL LOSE TO MCCAIN PERIOD! GROW UP DEMOCRATS! THIS IS ABOUT ELECTING A DEMOCRAT NOT A REPUBLICAN AND IT WAS A REPUBLICAN THAT MADE THOSE RULES AND ALSO IOWA AND NEW HAMPSHIRE AND OTHERS MOVED THERE DATES UP WHY DON'T WE TAKE AWAY THEIR VOTES!

Posted by: christy | May 16, 2008 3:04:47 PM

Barack Obama himself, but now playing the role of George Bush in the sly with such skill! Sen. Barack Obama obviously has so much more in common with George Bush than meets the eye; it is said they are even very distant relatives; well, I'm not surprised! And as usual the whole Washington media establishment was silent, more or less abandoning their responsibility of safeguarding the rights of the people to vote in a democracy such as ours; ditching their role─ to say the obvious. Sen. Obama’s lawyers had successfully blocked the re-voting of Michigan and Florida. I amazed that the preventing Michigan and Florida vote didn't seem to bother anyone in the whole Washington media establishment one bit; not even that MSNBC motor- mouth Keith Dobermann. In this new era of new politics that's promised by Sen. Obama, can this really happen, or is this politics as usual-- circa Florida 2000? The more Sen. Obama strains to speak of his new era of politics in America, less and less of it seemed real. Sen. Obama should practice what he preaches so blatantly and the presidential primary campaign is a good place to start…I think, it’s only just that Al Gore should endorse Sen. Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: charleychaplin | May 16, 2008 3:10:24 PM

While I have sympathy for the voters in Michigan and Florida, I feel their just anger is headed in the wrong direction.

Citizens in both states should not be angry at the DNC. The DNC created primary guidelines that everyone agreed to abide by, including the Democrat leaders in MI and FL. If the voters in these states lose their primary votes, its not the fault of the DNC, but instead the fault of the individual Democrat leaders in those two states who decided they could 'break the rules.' If I were a resident of either state, I would vote out any and all Democrat leaders who voted to move the primaries before February 5th.

Bill Clinton is trying to play this off as a fault of the entire democrat leadership, when quite actually, the leadership of these two states is solely to blame.

The Clintons are now a danger to the Democratic party and are trying to place a wedge in it. Funny since Hillary also voted for the February primaries.

They broke the rules. They pay the price. Nobody can take away their votes in November, and that is the utmost importance.

Posted by: Jim | May 16, 2008 3:12:04 PM

Will someboby please explain to me why a Loser like Howard Dean became the head of DNC...YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!

Posted by: Ronnie | May 16, 2008 3:15:49 PM

Ok, do not count the vote and I will be the first person to cross over to McCain and vote for him in November.

So will millions of angry disenchanged people in FL and MI.

Welcome McCain!

Posted by: Stacey | May 16, 2008 3:17:08 PM

Count the votes and convince the superdelegates to vote for Clinton. It's the only change Democrats have to win in November and save the Supreme Court. Obama is a fraud.

Posted by: Andrew Austin | May 16, 2008 3:18:45 PM

Something else I just discovered today...the latest mathmatics:
http://12counts.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/why-obama-wont-count-the-votes-hillarys-winning/
Obama, you and your campaigners are cheating!

Posted by: Di | May 16, 2008 3:19:02 PM

FAT ASS BILL IS AT IT AGAIN. SPREADING LIES, SAYING ANYTHING HE HAS TO TO GET HILARY ELECTED SUCH AS HIS POSITION ON FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN. HE CONVIENTLY FORGETS THAT HILARY VOTED IN FAVOR OF NOT SEATING THE MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA DELAGATES (WHEN SHE WAS AHEAD IN THE RACE) BECAUSE THESE TWO STATES CHOSE TO HOLD THEIR PRIMARIES EARLY.

ALSO, LETS NOT FORGET THAT ON 10/10/07 HILARY STATED, (REGARDING THE MICHIGAN PRIMARY) "IT'S CLEAR, THIS ELECTION THEY'RE HAVING IS NOT GOING TO COUNT FOR ANYTHING."

YOU CLINTONS, ALL THREE OF YOU, DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT PEOPLES VOTING RIGHTS. ALL YOU CARE ABOUT IS WINNING THE WHITE HOUSE ANYWAY YOU CAN.

WELL, ITS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. HILARY WILL BE LUCKY IF SHE GETS ELECTED DOGCATCHER. HER POLITICAL CAREER IS OVER, BILLS LEGACY IS IN RUINS AND POOR CHELSE HAS TO LIVE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE THAT HER PARENTS ARE SLIME.

REGARDING THE FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN VOTERS WHO ARE NOW COMPLAING...THEIR ELECTED OFFICIALS MADE A DECISION, RIGHT OR WRONG AND THEY MUST NOW LIVE WITH IT. THE HELL WITH THEM.

Posted by: BOO-HOO | May 16, 2008 3:19:13 PM

SEAT FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN OR LOSE IN THE GENERAL TO MCCAIN!

Posted by: BR | May 16, 2008 3:19:57 PM

The Clintons are silly. Can you imagine after a ball game is lost you argue that you got more cheers and the rules are not fair and that you should be declared winner despite loosing it on the scores? Just plain silly. What they are doing is a national embarrassment and disgrace.

Posted by: pete | May 16, 2008 3:21:15 PM

Post a comment