you dont know what appeasment means do you?

Creature of Washington?

i love how bush and cheney change what words mean, and then all their followers and rush ditto heads embrace the meaning without knowing what it means...

chris matthews exposed your kind... lol nice try though

LOL csquan please

thats what bush and mccain say...

to appease someone you have to give them something

they drew a line between Neville Chamberlain A REPUBLICAN who signed the munich agreement

GIVING (theres the appeasment)

adolf hitler part of Czechoslovakia

which is no longer a country but mccain wants to put a weapon defense system there

and where did you hear BIDEN LOL make this so called appeasement charge of obama?

Fox news LOL

or possibly ABC

For bhrandon. Please. Chamberlain was not a Republican. He was British, and shared many liberal Americans' views that peace is obtainable through "ingenious argument" as well as the view that the state should be responsible for the economic welfare of all citizens. He authored the infamous "Widows, Orphans, and Old Age Pensions Act 1925," which did much to foster the development of the welfare state in Britain. These views destroyed the British Empire and reduced their nation to the third level irrelevant nation it has sadly become.

Bush is such a class act. Teddy Kennedy is not. Ted would have never wished Bush well.

john tyler,

you are correct in my haste i lumped the senator that bush was talking about in with the prime minister who was actually the person doing the appeasing

csquan why do you feel the need to use baracks middle name?

does it have significance for you?
or do you simply use everyones middle name when talking about them?

To appease somone does not mean giving them anything. You can appease someone by staying on the sidelines and doing nothing. Either one can be very dangerous. We need a president who knows when to act and how to act. It's a matter of good judgment. To talk with every rogue regime is a waste of political clout. You don't see the pope seeking counsel from the altar boy! Peace through strength. If your opponents want to flex their muscles, show them your bombs! OOPS, I guess I must be one of those war mongers like Ronald Reagan was, who caused the collapse of the former Soviet Union using that exact strategy. Wake up you dimwitted liberals!

Feel better, Teddy, my friend. You've served our Commonwealth well over the years! Go Sox and C's!

An Obama presidency would be a repeat of a Bush presidency because he would suffer from the same flaw--no real experience. Much of the trouble we are in today stems from the fact that Bush was to inexperienced to be President--but he was very popular. Obama is very popular but also lacks the real experience it takes to run this county. We do not need four more years of on the job training.

You may say he will have trusted advisors but look who is lining up with him. All the big losers in the Democratic party. He has a who stable of losers. Kerry, Edwards, Chris Dodd, Richardson etc. Even Teddy Kennedy is a loser because he couldn't deliver Mass. for Obama in primary.

I see an excellent opportunity for democratic women to switch parties. The Republican party is in chaos. Now may be the time for pro- choice women to secure a foothold in the Repbulican party. They could replace the evangelicals. If the democrats choose a man over a woman then I think the message is clear. Let the men have the party.