« Previous | Main | Next »

Clinton Meets With Party Elite to Count Florida & Michigan Vote

Share

May 07, 2008 6:06 PM

ABC News' Matthew Jaffe and Z. Byron Wolf Report: The day after a tight win in Indiana and solid loss in North Carolina, Hillary Clinton spent ninety minutes Thursday convincing superdelegates of her case for staying in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination.

"I met with a number of members of Congress and others who have a role to play in this process," Sen. Clinton, D-N.Y., said as she emerged from the Democratic National Committee offices on Capitol Hill in Washington.

"We talked a lot about Florida and Michigan. There was a demonstration here right before I got here from West Virginia and I think that everybody realizes that we've got to resolve what's going to happen with the delegates from Florida and Michigan. And I'll continue to emphasize and stress that we cannot disenfranchise those voters and I hope we'll have a resolution," she said.

In the two hours Clinton was inside the DNC, several members of Congress came and went but only Rep. Christopher Carney, D-Penn., confirmed he met with Clinton and a number of others said that they were not there for that purpose.

Florida and Michigan were stripped of their delegates by the Democratic party when those two states leaped ahead of others in the primary calendar.  They held votes but in Michigan, Obama's name did not appear on the ballot and both candidates agreed not to campaign in either state.

"I'm staying in this race until there's a nominee," Clinton told reporters at a press conference in West Virginia on Wednesday.

When asked if she would accept Obama as the party's nominee if he reached 2,210 delegates, Clinton praised the reporter for using the 2,210 instead of 2,025 calling it "the right figure".

I'm glad you used the figure 2,210 because I think that's the right figure because that includes the seating of delegates from Florida and Michigan something that I have said consistently as I have said consistently for months now," Clinton said without directly answering the query.

With roughly 18 delegates (of the 187 that were at stake Tuesday) left to be allocated, Obama is 182 delegates shy of reaching the magic number 2,025 to secure the nomination. Clinton is 346 delegates away -- that is roughly 70% of the total remaining pledged and unpledged (super) delegates left to be allocated.

ABC News' David Chalian, Eloise Harper, Jake Tapper and Karen Travers contributed to this report.

May 7, 2008 in Bush, George W., Kucinich, Dennis, Tancredo, Tom, Veepstakes | Permalink | User Comments (139)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Why can't the DNC understand that Michigan and Florida are two important states. They had better get that issue resolved. Who ever is the nominee, they can't win without them. It seems Hillary is the only one fighting for those votes. If everyone says Obama is the potential nominee, why are his supporters or the DNC fighting for those delegates. He has to win those states in November. McCain is already ahead in Florida.

Posted by: Lois, California | May 7, 2008 7:19:09 PM

rrbb2003: LOL!!! I'll be surprised if Mccain takes 20 states.

Posted by: ron | May 7, 2008 7:20:48 PM

Based on current voting pattern from Obama, it is likely Obama can only win 10 "black" states thanks to his half-AA brothers and will lose the rest of them since he can't win white votes and other minority votes per his past winning records..

Posted by: True Truth | May 7, 2008 7:24:12 PM

I doubt states like Oregon, Washington, California, Wisonsin, Connecticut, etc. are "black states."

Posted by: ron | May 7, 2008 7:25:40 PM

Obama has been used to put the Clintons out smart of Kerry and Kennedy Dood Nunn ect
Talk about class war fare when will they start taxing us all even poor who work.

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008 7:26:14 PM

True Truth and here I thought we only had red and blue states.

Posted by: d | May 7, 2008 7:27:12 PM

Mr Mouse..it ain't over til its over : )

Posted by: DaneNM | May 7, 2008 7:27:56 PM

Mary: Clinton, Kucinich and Dodd were the only ones who had their names on the ballot...everyone else followed the rules of the DNC....Kucinich and Dodd put their names on the ballot because they were desperate for even one vote...Clinton put her name on the ballot as a back-up plan in case something like this happened because she is a ruthless candidate. In an interview with NPR during New Hampshire she told the interviewer that she new the vote in MI was a joke. And yes, the audio of that interview is still around...sorry!

Posted by: ron | May 7, 2008 7:28:41 PM

Bottom line here is that Dems mostlikely will crown Obama as its nominee unless there is a dramatic blow from Obama side...

So the Hillary's supporters need to decide if they like to put country first or Party first...

Do you really think McCain would be a "bad" president simply because he is Reps? Don't forget Reagon is Reps as well, who Obama has praised as his idol..

Posted by: True Truth | May 7, 2008 7:34:36 PM

I want to respond to True Truth

Please do not bring up the stereotype that Republicans are small government, tax cutters and that the Democrats are tax and spend liberals. The truth is that the last three Republican Presidents have borrowed their way to tax cuts. This means that future generations will end up paying the bill (with interest). Likewise the statement that Republicans are for small government. Not so. Bush ((jr) has presided over the biggest expansion of government in decades.

The truth is that both Democrats AND Republicans love to spend our money. The only real difference is where the money is allocated. I look to Obama to reverse this by assigning spending in line with OUR priorities.

Posted by: Cataplasm | May 7, 2008 7:37:59 PM

The CNN statistics vary slightly from ABC delegate votes, which isn't untypical for the data. Obama's popular vote only exceeds Clinton's by 2 percent. The DNC will have a Rules and Bylaws Committee meeting on May 31st where the delegate issues in Michigan and Florida are expected to be resolved. In the next round of a six state primary, Oregon looks like the only state to Obama's clear advantage. My point is this is a very tight but still fluid race, not a fixed and decisive one with a clear winner and loser to declare.

Posted by: katrina | May 7, 2008 7:39:24 PM

Katrina: MT and SD will go for Obama...even if MI and FL went for Clinton she would still be far behind because of yesterday's results...its over.

Posted by: ron | May 7, 2008 7:41:17 PM

Be realistic, no one will withdraw troops without final assessemnt of security stability of mid-east...

The war in Iraq is a national interest and international security matter...

Neither Rep nor Dem will withdraw troops because it is opposed by military leaders and it will cause chaos in Mid-east...The oil price will be hitting the roof and the entire global economy will be shaking...

Posted by: True Truth | May 7, 2008 7:45:00 PM

Do your jobs and count the votes already. Geez.

Posted by: Mack | May 7, 2008 7:49:41 PM

You can't make us unify behind someone that is NOT FIT to be president no matter how many times you repeat it. We won't!! we won't!! we won't!!

McCAIN over BHO any day !!!

Posted by: Vickie | May 7, 2008 7:52:51 PM

Mary: Did you forget the part where I said that in an interview with NPR CLinton said that she knew that the vote in MI was a joke...like all Clinton supporters you hear what you want to hear...the truth must hurt.

Posted by: ron | May 7, 2008 7:53:51 PM

Clinton should quit....LOL!!!

Posted by: ron | May 7, 2008 7:57:57 PM

Cute, huh?

Think they'll show up in November to vote? It may not be "in" then or fashionable. It's hard to maintain the interest of the young for that long. Seasons change.
Hey, it'll be football and beer season—well, that's ongoing.

I'm sure there's some "serious" support there, but don't count on a huge vote, it has a tradition of just vaporizing.

Posted by: Mary | May 7, 2008 7:58:24 PM

This time I sort of agree with True Truth on the draw down of our troops BUT do you realise who really supplies our crude oil (and petroleum for that matter)? In decending order they are: Canada, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Nigeria, Venezuela, IRAQ (no less), Angola, Kuwait, Colombia, Algeria, Ecuador, Brazil, Congo, Chad and Russia. Sort of light on those "nasty Arabs" don't you think! Saudi Arabia constituted something less than 18% of February's imports per the list above. As a percentage of totals (including home production) it was considerably less!

Posted by: Cataplasm | May 7, 2008 7:59:22 PM

A: You don't seem believable due to twisted comments.
B: Response: Obama thought less than Hillary. Reread it.
C: The joke is on you, think it through...you're the one who said she was ruthless and that it was a backup plan. Can't have your cake and eat it too.
D: The truth is what it is. Light. Knowledge. Power. Don't try to craft a halo for Obama, he's just an ambitious politician and a junior one at that. He is a puppet, just as "W" was. He doesn't know the job or what to say...not yet ready for prime time.

Posted by: mary | May 7, 2008 8:08:40 PM

Post a comment