« Obama Hints He Sees Imbalance in the Way the Press Covers McCain | Main | Obama on Iowa Return, 'a Terrific Way to Bring Things Full Circle' »

Clinton Not Running to Represent Some People on Television

Share

May 18, 2008 7:34 PM

ABC News' Eloise Harper reports: In her latest assault against the media, Sen. Hillary Clinton said today in Mayfield, Ky., that she is not running to represent those people on television who keep saying she should quit and that they don’t have faith in democracy.

Cleary irritated that pundits and television personalities have been saying the end is near, Clinton, as she did yesterday, lambasted the media, saying she is not running to represent them as president.

"There are some folks, you can see them on TV every night, who wanted it to be over for me after Iowa, and every time they say it, something funny happens, the voters don't agree," Clinton said. "And so what I'm hopin', what I am hoping is that on Tuesday you're going to send a real message to a lot of those folks who didn't want you to vote, who don't want me to keep fighting for you and fighting for our country."

Clinton continued to say the media was opposed to more democracy in this country.

"And you know what always strikes me as a little bit curious is that most of the folks who are saying 'end it' seem to -- they don't seem to have much faith in democracy. We want more democracy not less democracy. More people involved," she said. "Every one of them always seems to be talkin' at us instead of with us."

Clinton portrayed the media as being out of touch with the common people in the country.

"I would bet every single one of those folks, they’ve got a job -- we can see that, they’ve got good healthcare, we know that," she said. "They can pay whatever the charge is at the gas pump most likely. They can send their child to college."

The New York senator, who has said in the past she is running to be the president for all Americans, said today about the people in media who are counting her out: "I'm not running to represent them. I'm running to fight for you."

Clinton did say earlier in her speech that shipping jobs overseas was "unpatriotic." "we’ve got to take out of our tax code one penny of benefits so there nothing left for any company that moves a job out of Kentucky to a foreign country– that is unpatriotic."

Clinton, as she has for weeks, mentioned her plan for a summer gas tax holiday.

"I've been criticized from the right on this and I’ve been criticized from the left, which always makes me feel like I’m exactly in the right spot," she said.

Clinton continues her swing through Kentucky, making stops across the state on Monday before the primary on Tuesday.

May 18, 2008 in Clinton, Hillary | Permalink | User Comments (46)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/433071/29208138

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Clinton Not Running to Represent Some People on Television:

User Comments

75,000 Americans came to listen to Barack Obama today in Portland, Oregon.

That's the difference.

Posted by: trent | May 18, 2008 7:49:29 PM

well the media is a very bias place and part of the he man women haters club Hillary clinton and her supporters have been trashed by this media. The media hate the Clinton's and d##m if I know why Hillary has fought every thing the msm has piled on to think that they would shut down her campagin like her supporters don't count there have been days that have been so unfair like her big win the media didn't have to spend two days on a pompas pretty boys endorsement Obama can't even win the GE all will see in NOV. If anything the media has much to answer in history for.

Posted by: Bishop | May 18, 2008 7:51:36 PM

Ungrateful Clinton:

If it were not for the Media, Senator Clinton would have been knocked off the game long time ago. The media gave her life, period. ...and she should be grateful for all that.

Posted by: LL | May 18, 2008 7:53:08 PM

Hillary, the freedom of the press to say that you'd better get out of the way now is very much part of a well functioning democracy. Don't blame journalists for not being that impressed by your performance and your 'solutions for America'. Blame yourself, for a change.

Posted by: maria | May 18, 2008 7:55:32 PM

Home of the egg heads no wonder but the middle of the country is where he is trouble 270,000 voted last Tuesday for Hillary and he is suppose to be the front runner when he is crowned everyone turn off the tv and see if he can win without help like Hillary has had to. Any one who is not troubled by this election does not care about what is right in this world and waht is wrong with America.

Posted by: Bishop | May 18, 2008 8:00:15 PM

Where was the coward press when the Iraq war started? The corporations that own then do whatever is best for then business wise.
CNN, MSNBC, NBC are a shame!

Posted by: john | May 18, 2008 8:03:24 PM

The MSM have been VERY kind to Hillary. They never touched on her role in Whitewater, for instance, which is pretty amazing considered the fact that she was running for President. Feminist Camille Paglia only last week wrote that she DOES think that Hillary was involved in Vince Foster's "suicide", and yes, all indicators tell us she must have been. And yet, noone in the MSM jumped on any of the MANY Clinton scandals, and they even only whispered Lewinksy once in every four months. Amazing, for Hillary was planning to enter the White House with an impeached President as husband... Instead, the MSM hes been ALL over Wright for instance. Hillary has NO reason to complain about the MSM. And she can't blame the MSM for not liking her as a human being. They simply don't like her, and probably for good reasons.

Posted by: Hazard | May 18, 2008 8:08:22 PM

I was standing a few feet away from
Bruce Springsteen and Sen. JOhn Kerry

in downtown cleveland 4 yrs ago this novemeber

and over 100,000 thousand people were in the same market and public square

...and the next day...by the next morning

we lost again the white house to a very stupid acting guy named George

so don't worry about the numbers all you who think major numbers is what it takes

in pa..on the night before the election

over 35,000 people came out to see
obama in pitt stadium...

...he still lost

in columbus, over 25,000 came out
he won the cityof columbus
he lost 84 out of 88 counties

in ohio

so the big crowds don't impress
me much

its the final talley

and...just wait...till puerto rico

And HOWARD AND DONNA
DON't YOU DARE TOUCH THAT END IT
BUTTON AFTER TUES NIGHT OK?

ALLOW PUERTO RICANS TO FIND THEIR VOICE AT LEAST ONCE IN THIS CENTURY
OK?????

GIVE THE LATINOS AND THE RICANS AND THOSE OTHER MINORITIES OF THE USA

A CHANCE TO VOICE THEIR CONCERNS TOO
PLEASE....

for the sake of america ...just do it

Posted by: appalachian blue | May 18, 2008 8:09:44 PM

Hillary Clinton has every right to feel as she does about the news media. Fox News doesn't love her, but they're about the only ones who have treated her fairly. The rest of the major networks began worshiping at Obama's altar several months ago, for reasons I've never really understood. I think Fox started feeling sorry for Hillary when the other networks could only criticize and ridicule her, as they parroted orders from the High Command (the DNC). In every interview, including one with Bill O'Reilly, Hillary comes across as a nice person. Her opponent does not.

Posted by: Rhys | May 18, 2008 8:12:46 PM

If it hadn't been for her great press coverage, Hillary would have decided to bow out long ago. The media attention kept and keeps her going. All the facts and numbers are against her.

Posted by: Shakespeare | May 18, 2008 8:17:17 PM

While I am not going to disparage or say anything negative about the unbelievable excitement created by Obama, because I think that is great, I also think she has every right to be annoyed with calls to drop out.

There is no nominee until someone hits the 'magic number'. So just stop telling her to get out.

None the less, kudos to Obama for generating that kind of excitement.

Posted by: Joan | May 18, 2008 8:19:12 PM

Yes, Shakespeare, Hillary HAS received press coverage... almost all of it negative! It strikes me as ironic that Fox News, which normally shreds Democrats, has treated Hillary Clinton in a "Fair and Balanced" manner, usually reserved for Republicans and Theocrats. But since most Democrats don't watch Fox News, all we have seen is the daily shredding of Hillary by the other networks.

Posted by: Rhys | May 18, 2008 8:22:07 PM

Elisabeth Edwards is "not backing Hillary", Politico learns us today. At Hillary's official blog a continuous slander against her husband is going on; now America's sorest comapny of losers will start to agressively attack Elisabeth as well. Why hasn't the MSM focused on what's happening in Hillary blogs and forums out there? They are the most agressive, intolerant and smearful places on the Internet. Disgusting.

Posted by: maria | May 18, 2008 8:23:18 PM

TRENT SAID ::: 75,000 Americans came to listen to Barack Obama today in Portland, Oregon.

So Hitler use to draw 500,000 people to see him.

Obama also need to learn history. Obama said Kennedy talked to the enemy. Kennedy was going to wipe CUBA off the face of the earth if they did not stop pointing MISSLES toward United States.

Posted by: scar face | May 18, 2008 8:24:32 PM

Joan, there is no question that Obama has "generated excitement". Throughout history, people with charisma have been able to generate enthusiasm. It's how they USE that power which is important. It's a sad day for America when we elect someone just on the basis of charisma. The Presidency is more complicated than that.

Posted by: Rhys | May 18, 2008 8:25:22 PM

Maria... There is no question that some people use forums (blogs, message boards, or whatever) to post hateful messages. But neither side (Clinton or Obama) has a monopoly on this. The rest of us, who want to debate POLITICS, simply must ignore those who use these spaces for profanity and insults. Just because you may have a different opinion from mine doesn't make you an idiot. The anonymity of the Internet brings out the worst in some of us, unfortunately.

Posted by: Rhys | May 18, 2008 8:30:02 PM

I was among the 75,000! One thing confused me: ALL the folks around me were WHITE!

Scary!

LOL!

Posted by: Joanna | May 18, 2008 8:30:19 PM

maria, what someone posts in a blog is not news. Plus the same thing is happening to Obama. It's the internet.

Posted by: lisa | May 18, 2008 8:31:52 PM

A lot of the primaries were held in January and February when Obama was considered the "wonder boy" candidate. I, too, was taken up with him and voted for him in one of those primaries. Then came March and the Wright revelations. That caused voters to look at Obama in a new light, and more and more disturbing things came out about him. Had those primaries been held after March, Clinton would have won them and Obama would not be in the position he is in today. Clinton is the only candidate that can beat McCain. If Obama gets the nomination, you will be saying President McCain in January.

Posted by: Joyce | May 18, 2008 8:42:58 PM

Here is a question do you think he will need Hillary's support to win the GE.

Posted by: Bishop | May 18, 2008 8:44:08 PM

No, the kind and amount of Edwards slander I found on Hillary's blog is TYPICAL, I learned. And there is another Hillary forum where folks are totally engaged in embracing right wing and racist complot theories against Obama, too plain silly for words and very shocking and confusing. The official Obama community blog is VERY different from all that. It isn't heavily moderated as Hillary's blog is, so you'll find anti-Obama posts at his OFFICIAL site (nothing of that kind at Hillary's place, only jubilant support - and anti-Obama or Edwards agression). But I never read the kind and amount of slander against ANY Hillary endorser at the Obama blog that I found at Hillary's blog as directed against Edwards (all posts passed the strict moderation of that blog!! amazing). I think it's shocking and it tells me lot about MANY of Hillary's supporters. And again, it totally amazes me that no journalist has written a critical comparative study about the these two official blogs, for I truly think they tell the whole story. NO discussion of the issues on Hillary's blog, a LOT of that on Obama's blog etc. Strict moderation at Hillary's place, freedom of expression at Obama's... etc etc.

Posted by: maria | May 18, 2008 8:44:25 PM

Here is a question do you think he will need Hillary's support to win the GE.

Posted by: Bishop | May 18, 2008 8:45:53 PM

Bishop.

Yes!

Obama08

Posted by: Thinking | May 18, 2008 8:55:28 PM

The largest rally in presidental primary history was in Portland today.

Obama continues to write American history. He's a once in a lifetime political phenomenon, which in this time of cynicism could NEVER be true for any "empty suit". After all these months of Obama exposure and Obama bashing more and more people are fired up by his phenomenal and unexpected rise as a Washington outsider in the heart of American politics. Some are still shocked or confused by it, for an excellent candidate as Hillary loses where he wins, but their moods will change. Here is good and honest man, as Hillary will tell us as well when her race is over. She knows it, therefore she "greatly admires" him, therefore she is "honored" to run in this same historical year at Obama's side - as his rival, yes, but as his friend as well.

Obama's is nn amazing and indeed historical achievement. And - the best is no doubt to come. America will be the world's bright shining star again, a deeply BELOVED country. Well, we need some of that, don't we?

Posted by: History | May 18, 2008 8:57:40 PM

Bishop here's my thoughts. There are some Hillary supporters that will not vote for Obama even with Hillary's help. Then there are Hillary supporters who will vote for a dem regardless. Blue states will go dem no matter what, so we're talking about swing states. I think at best she could convince them to at least stay home and not vote for McCain. But this is just my opinion.

Posted by: lisa | May 18, 2008 8:58:28 PM

Bishop, Obama will need Hillary Clinton's support, but it may not be enough. As we learn more about him, McCain looks better all the time (although I still dislike McCain's position on several issues). Barack Obama was a sprinter "out of the gate", but it's a muddy track, and he's stumbling. Sure, he has a following, even though no one is sure what "change" he's talking about. If he gets into office, he will discover it takes a lot more than an "empty suit" to be President. We could ALL pay the price for Obama's "learning experience".

Posted by: Rhys | May 18, 2008 9:02:25 PM

A reality check. Those of us who are older (I am 69) must recognize our "dinosaur status", and Obama is the asteroid. Our time is passing; the future belongs to the young. My wife and I always knew America would become the USSA (adding the word Socialistic) at some time in the future; we just didn't think we'd live to see it. But we may, and cannot change what is about to happen to our country. Thanks, President Bush, for creating a backlash which will destroy the America in which us "old fogeys" grew up.

Posted by: Rhys | May 18, 2008 9:08:35 PM

There is nothing negative on Hillary's site so I don't know what Maria is talking about or on any of her fourm's but you can go to the DNC and obama controls those blogs also I will have no problem going independent,and the kids at least I hope they are kids have been vile but I think they will learn like we did in sixty eight you don't always get what you want [use to be a song]

Posted by: Bishop | May 18, 2008 9:09:48 PM

Bishop.

These are blogs. People say what they want, and not all are who they pretend to be.

Many, many posters just post to get a rise nothing else. It is hard to tell who is who.

There are some good posters from both sides, but it takes a lot of walking through the mud to find them.

Posted by: Thinking | May 18, 2008 9:16:19 PM

Bishop, it still is a song, lol, a good one too. There are definately some people that are only here to cause trouble. I generally ignore those posts.

Posted by: lisa | May 18, 2008 9:16:56 PM

Yes, BO likes rally; the rally in pitt stadium; which is before he lost by 10 points and spending 11.2m in TV ads.
He likes to stand behind a podium with monologue.
He is afraid of questions except the stereoptyped ones with his prepared answers.
He is afraid of debates. He ducks debates
He is afraid of challenges: that is why he ducks campaigning in West Virginia as muc as he could; JFK would never have that. He ducks revotes.

BO fanatics make up an impressive legislative records for him and passes around the internet; They are fabrications and not true; FACTCHECK says don't believe it.

BO is a phone riding on high-flown poetic promises of change. Let's see where does he get his legislative record.

Todd Spivak of the Houston Press has documented how Obama accomplished next to nothing in his first six years in the Illinois legislature.

Then Emil Jones Jr. an African American with thirty years in the legislature made Obama a sponsor of 26 bills that became law. This is how BO portrays himself as a highly successful legislator.

This is just like giving him the ball at 1 yard line and carries him in on his back.

Has Obama repaid Jones? Yes. He has provided tens of millions in earmarks for Jones' district.

BO's abuses of earmarks:

Michelle Obama's salary at University of Chicago Hospitals when her husband won the US Senate seat was $121,000. Within weeks of his swearing in, her salary went to over $320,000. The following year Obama did an earmark request for $1 million for her employer.

In reality, BO has taken considerable money and support from all sorts of corporate and other special interests. Remember his Bittergate talking to billionaires in San Francisco! He has no record of being a reformer, whatsoever.

Posted by: John_Lai | May 18, 2008 9:20:05 PM

Bishop and Lisa... As long as we're quoting appropriate songs, remember the lyric by Badfinger: "There's no good revolution; it's just power changin' hands."

Posted by: Rhys | May 18, 2008 9:21:00 PM

A true supporter of justice in this country will never support OBAMA, the tongue twister smearing from Bush's playbook.

Posted by: John_Lai | May 18, 2008 9:23:10 PM

Here is more of Badfinger's song (called "Perfection"):

"There is no real perfection
There'll be no perfect day
Just love is our connection
The truth in what we say

There's no good revolution
Just power changing hands
There is no straight solution
Except to understand"

It fits, doesn't it?


Posted by: Rhys | May 18, 2008 9:28:40 PM

I should know that song by badfinger I should of put it is a song. I think I can vote for Mccain with no problem I don't mind a younger president but this guy is not what I want.

Posted by: Bishop | May 18, 2008 9:33:24 PM

Wow Rhys, how did you come up with that one. Yes it does fit. Although I don't remember the tune, I'm sure I'd recognize it if I heard it.

Posted by: lisa | May 18, 2008 9:36:56 PM

Hillary Clinton is the stronger candidate, on paper. She's been elected to the Senate twice, with real Republican opponents. She MAY have been co-Vice President for 8 years.

Obama was "present" in the Illinois legislature for two terms. His election to the US Senate was a fluke, when the Republican candidate withdrew. His two years in the Senate have been notable for having the most liberal voting record, according to both liberal and conservative rating groups.

Clinton's problem is that 47% of all American voters voters consider her absolutely unqualified for high office, due to her enabling of Bill, and her personal scandals such as the cattle futures deal.

The Democrats may be choosing between their two WORST candidates, from a general election success standpoint.

Posted by: Jackson | May 18, 2008 9:45:04 PM

to bad maria some of us are americans first and democrats second and have done our homework and understand what the combine is ,do you.do you also understand obamas repeated associations since his teenage years with people who despise this country,he has admitted this in his own words.you can call us hillary supporters any name you like it does not change the fact that somewhere between 12 to 25 percent of us who voted for hillary will NOT vote for obama,you do the math.

Posted by: don tufts | May 18, 2008 9:56:25 PM

Oh please Jackson don't make it harder for those of us that might have to vote Mccain both our candidates are better than what we have had with the war to get rich.And she is absolutely qualified.

Posted by: Bishop | May 18, 2008 10:00:11 PM

BARACK OBAMA DRAWS CROWD OF 75,000 IN OREGON Sunday. Reports say crowd size of a "City."

Help me Hillary fans, I can't seem to find ANY stories about Hillary on any of the major blogs today....

OBAMA = The democratic Nominee and next president!

Hillary = Irrelevant...

Bye bye Hillary and Bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!

Obama for President 2008!

Posted by: Davis | May 18, 2008 10:34:11 PM

The Hillary supporters who are in great numbers are Women are really surprising me with their blogs. I love Women but I could not imagine that some of these blogs have such hatred in them. Please don't threaten that you will vote for McCain if Hillary loses which she has,because you will be out in the street with no shoes on if you vote for him.Picture what four more years of this miserable Republican administration has done to this country. So grow up and for your own salvation vote for whoever the Democrats come up with. I am a white senior voting Democratic. God Bless America.

Posted by: Richard K | May 19, 2008 1:12:29 AM

The Hillary supporters who are in great numbers are Women are really surprising me with their blogs. I love Women but I could not imagine that some of these blogs have such hatred in them. Please don't threaten that you will vote for McCain if Hillary loses which she has,because you will be out in the street with no shoes on if you vote for him.Picture what four more years of this miserable Republican administration has done to this country. So grow up and for your own salvation vote for whoever the Democrats come up with. I am a white senior voting Democratic. God Bless America.

Posted by: Richard K | May 19, 2008 1:12:37 AM

75,000 went to see Obama, they had to because he sure as hell wasn't going to get off his ass and go see them.
Not quite as funny as THEY ALL APPLAUDED WHEN HE BLEW HIS NOSE! That pretty much says it all.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | May 19, 2008 2:17:40 AM

I almost put a link to an article about Hillary's campaign from FOX news on my facebook because it was the most accurate and fair poll i've read in a long time. Then I remembered the big anti-FOX news banner on there. It's hard going for a Hillary supporter, every single Murdoch paper in Australia is parroting on about Obama's "campaign" now, like they're cheering him on. (maybe Murdoch knows what we Hillblazers know-he'll get blown over) But as they say, when the going gets tough for a Hillary supporter, we get going.

We won't give in to Obama's (and the media, and the DNC's) spin.

Posted by: kate | May 19, 2008 10:09:10 AM

This is pathetic. The love the media when the media when the press is working in their favor, but hates the media when the press swings against their interest.

I suspect the real reason they are upset is because they tried to shop around the Rev. Wright story and NO MEDIA OUTLET WOULD TOUCH IT AT FIRST. Well, it was her campaign, she should have put the story out there just like they did of him wearing the African attire!

They can't get mad when they themselves didn't do the work! Oh, and to run an ad with Tim Russert is TACKY. That man has never been nothing but a gentleman to her, EACH and everytime she has been on his show. And George S. and the rest of ABC news has ALWAYS been in her camp. It is very tasteless the way they are claiming they are victims.

Another thing, there has been bias I agree but that is due to the nature of Clinton's relation to the press and how poorly they treat members of the press. I don't know how she expects any sort of different treatment going forward playing this blame game. Blame, blame, blame...complain, complain, complain....its a endless cycle.

Posted by: Thomas | May 19, 2008 2:09:24 PM

One reason Hillary need to drop out of the race
Hillary not for every American and gender
Hillary is a racist and do need to drop out of the race
Hillary we cannot and will not vote for you because you are a woman
The American people have more important issues, our concert, our family, this country
Hillary we are and was tried of hearing of you and Bill sex scandal in the White House and fraud, that your problems

We need our issues at the fore front, not yours

Hillary is a liar and not to be trusted

Posted by: chu13ck | May 20, 2008 5:56:26 PM

Post a comment