- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Gore: Race Will Be Settled Before Convention
May 06, 2008 2:24 PM
ABC News' Teddy Davis and Rick Klein Report: Count Al Gore among those who don't think the Democratic primary race will go all the way to the convention.
Appearing Tuesday on National Public Radio's "Fresh Air," the former vice president held out the possibility of making an endorsement in the race -- but predicted that superdelegates will tip the race to either Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., or Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-NY, before the Democratic National Convention in Denver this August.
"Even though it has gone on much longer than is normal in the age of primaries and caucuses, nevertheless I think the odds are overwhelming that it will tip rather decisively in one way or the other before the convention even meets," Gore said.
He said he does not anticipate having to help broker a solution to the Democrats' stand-off.
"I'm not anxious to be playing the role of party elder," he said. "I just turned 60 -- which is the new 59. So I'm just a voter and recovering politician."
"My purpose is not endorsing a candidate is not elaborate. I'm simply watching and listening to the campaign," he added. "As a delegate to the convention I will cast my vote at the proper time. I haven’t ruled out making an endorsement prior to that time, but I haven’t been moved to do so. . . . I have respect for both candidates, and they both have strengths, and I’m simply listening and watching like a lot of people."
Gore said the Democratic Party's system of awarding votes to superdelegates "probably . . . should be examined," and said he's confident that the disputed delegations from Florida and Michigan will be seated at the convention, though he didn't say how.
On the possibility of a split Democratic Party this Fall, he said: "I would not underestimate the healing power" of the desire to win.
May 6, 2008 in Tancredo, Tom | Permalink | User Comments (188)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Good Post, Raleigh Voter .
Posted by: jack | May 6, 2008 3:05:23 PM
Florida and Michigan are settled already. The primaries don't count. Hillary Clinton agreed to it months ago. Now she's decided she needs those votes, but that doesn't change a thing. The issue is settled.
Posted by: skeptic | May 6, 2008 3:06:34 PM
There is no doubt in my mind that Florida should count. The argument that some voters stayed home just does not factor in.
Michigan is trickier. There could have been a revote there but due to politicians being politicians, they disenfranchised the voters not once, but twice! If I were a voter from that state, I would be making sure that we elect out the old and in with the new. How dumb can politicians be in that state?
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 6, 2008 3:10:57 PM
I agree, Mary Ruth. Obama did miss a HUGE chance to speak up for Michigan and Florida. I have a feeling this will come back to haunt him. Sounds like we are heading for another Bush/Gore election, but this time, within the Democratic Party. Because of the DNC, who is blaming the candidates, mainly Hillary, for tearing up the party, it's actually the DNC along with Dean and Pelosi (idiot) that is destroying the party! Where are the voters rights anymore? It's like the American public doesn't even count anymore!
Posted by: jack | May 6, 2008 3:11:14 PM
Fl and Mi will be seated, but at the convention when wee will all know who the nominee is. Seating them would have no impact to the result. If there is any hint that they will be seated before Denver, and that might impact the result we have now, the Obama's campaign wouldn't agree with the deal. Anyway you don't reward someone who knows the rules and breaks it. I am sure that knows it as well. FL & MI knew the rules, they knew the sanctions ahead and decided anyway to violate them. They should be punish according to the rules.
Posted by: Collins | May 6, 2008 3:12:31 PM
Really- Gore can't stand the Clintons- seriously. He will endorse Obama only if and when he has to- to keep Hillary out of power. At one time Gore and Bill Clinton were not on speaking terms- that bad. He was deeply hurt and blames the Clintons for the low ethics and scandal ridden tenure in the White House, and he blames the Clintons for making the difference (a negative one) in his own presidential election in 2000. If the Clintons hadn't ruined it for Gore, he would have been president, and we would never have gone to war, a war that Hillary went on to authorize. Blame Bush for the war, but also blame the Clintons for keeping Gore out and then enabling the war effort- rest assured that Gore does.
Posted by: rco | May 6, 2008 3:13:11 PM
Sorry skeptic...you are wrong. Dean even said that the delegates will be seated somehow so this is hardly "settled". No matter what one believes as far as the rules go and so and so agreed to it, the fact remains that the votes will count....somehow.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 6, 2008 3:13:54 PM
I'm an independent voter.
I voted for republicans and democrats
in previous elections.
This time i'm for Hillary because we
had 8 peaceful and economic prosperous years.
If she loses the nomination i will
vote for McCain.
Posted by: Nicholas | May 6, 2008 3:14:48 PM
How did the Clinton's "ruin" Gore's chance at the Presidency? It was Gore's campaign that did not want Clinton to participate. Say what you want about Clinton's ethics, the people still love him. He could have brought a lot of moderates in to vote for Gore, not to mention Gore's looking like a stiff elite did not help him either.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 6, 2008 3:17:06 PM
He's absolutely sure that the bad American people are destroying the planet but demures that the superdelegates "probably . . . should be examined"? He's been a global warming guru for 8 years but a dem pol all his life.
He really is a one trick pony isn't he...
Posted by: smartprimate | May 6, 2008 3:17:31 PM
Enough of the "rules are rules" nonsense. This same thing happened years ago and the delegates were seated. If the rules were not meant to be broken then WHY did they do that?
If the rules were not meant to be broken then WHY did Dean say that they would be seated?
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 6, 2008 3:19:31 PM
Raleigh Voter: I agree with you, but can you elaborate why Florida should count? It seems to me that the DNC has really "muddied" these waters.
Posted by: jack | May 6, 2008 3:19:47 PM
I think not only should the delegates be seated, but there should have been a re-vote in Florida and Michigan. It's not the peoples fault they have stupid politicians in place. I hate it that people get on these posts and are glad that these two states are not counted...thats ludicrous! These voters have every right to be counted just as you and me!
Posted by: jack | May 6, 2008 3:24:22 PM
Please keep in mind that votes in a parties primaries are merely a politcal club (or party) deciding who their leader (candidate is). So, the club (DNC) makes the rules and the club abides by those rules, not the voting laws of the United States Government
thanks
Posted by: Barak | May 6, 2008 3:24:33 PM
Fl is different than MI. Names were on the ballot. The campaigning issue should not matter. The people that wanted to be heard went to vote. I have heard it all.
I have also heard that other states moved their voting dates up, also against the DNC rules but that those votes counted. I looked this up and found articles on it and it appears to be true. Still need to research it more because it JUST cannot be right or else it would have made bigger news.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 6, 2008 3:26:07 PM
It is called a compromise. It called being a good sport on Obama's part to even consider seating FL and MI. They will be seated in a manner that does not disadvantage any candidate - 50/50.
Posted by: Gillis | May 6, 2008 3:28:33 PM
LOL Gillis...that is funny.
Do not tell me about breaking rules though, the DNC makes the rules and breaks them! What is up with that??
It is easy to understand where Clinton is coming from...and the states that voted to move up their primaries. The DNC has a history of letting the rule-breakers slide by.
And come on, to have a little fun you need to break the rules sometimes :-)
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 6, 2008 3:29:47 PM
Raleigh Voter
I like your last post better. Please do the research.
Posted by: Gillis | May 6, 2008 3:30:28 PM
If Obama steals the nomination without Florida and Michigan coounted, then i believe the DNC should be labelled Black People's party or rather a racist party or a party that have no regard for women.
Posted by: A True black American | May 6, 2008 3:32:00 PM
It will not be difficult to vote for Hillary in the election. She has the support of the majority of Hispanics, Jews, Asians, 20% blacks, woman & the most reliable older than 65+. So why will it be difficult for her to win. If anything if will be difficult for Obama to win because he only has 80% of blacks & young voters. Hispanics tip two 2000 & 2004 for Bush because they are independents and the Republicans have fought for there vote. The only person that has fought for their votes has been Hillary for many years. If the Dem. Party forgets who they want, then they'll forget about them.
Posted by: Catalina | May 6, 2008 3:32:15 PM
Post a comment



