« Previous | Main | Next »

If You Try to Send the Troops to College, They Just Might Go

Share

May 09, 2008 10:31 AM

ABC's Z. Byron Wolf reports: The stage is a major wrap-yourself-in-the-flag, support-the-troops type measure on the floor of the US Senate in the coming weeks and it could have repercussions in the 2008 presidential campaign.

Democrats and some Republicans want to drastically improve college benefits for veterans through the GI Bill sponsored by Virginia Democrat Sen. Jim Webb.

Presumptive Republican nominee Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., solidified his position in a paper statement last night, along with the Pentagon and the White House, concerned that the measure could hurt retention in a time of war. In short, if you try to send the troops college, they might just go.

It's a particularly interesting issue because it pits McCain against his strongest ally across the aisle, Connecticut Independent Sen. Joe Lieberman, and high profile Republicans, like Sen. John Warner, R-Va., who is a co-sponsor of Webb's bill. It has also created a rallying point for veterans groups. Both Democratic presidential candidates are cosponsors of Webb's bill.

When senators consider the House version of the President's $108 billion war funding request in the coming weeks, look for Democrats to attach a proposal authored by Webb that would drastically upgrade the Montgomery GI Bill. Instead of receiving a fraction of college tuition (a max of about $3,000 per year), Webb and 54 other Senators from both parties want to make the GI Bill more like it was after WWII, when it paid for all of college, even private schools. They won't go quite that far, but would offer most veterans who serve in the war on terror -- even reserve and national guard who deploy --  compensation for the most expensive public school in their state as well as a living stipend.

McCain, along with Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., and Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., introduced his own, less generous plan that would encourage troops to stay in the military, increasing benefits more for troops who serve 12 years or more. McCain's bill would also encourage troops to transfer their GI Bill benefits to family members.

They point to a new report by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, requested by Republicans  on the Budget Committee that says improving college benefits for troops could lead affect military retention rates by as much as a 16 percent decrease. 

Supporters of the Webb bill  point to the same study, which says the improved college benefits would lead to a 16 percent increase in recruits overall. Plus, they argue the Webb bill would improve the quality of recruits who come to the military .

Beyond retention, however, Webb and others believe the country owes troops who sacrifice abroad, a good education when they return home.

Here's an earlier look at Webb and his bill.

May 9, 2008 in Hunter, Duncan | Permalink | User Comments (33)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Wow, now that's straight-talk. Politically dumb, I'm guessing, but McCain really put his cards on the table.

In short, he doesn't want to give veterans any benefits that might get them thinking about leaving military service to collect. If we keep sticking it to these guys, the ones that don't have better options will have to stay and fight our dumb Bush wars.

Posted by: Paul | May 9, 2008 10:54:43 AM

The more I think about this, the more amazed I am. This one could turn into a campaign landscape changer.

And seeing how McCain already signaled his willingness to keep these so-called wars going as long as a hundred years, he's clearly willing to use this argument for short-shifting veteran benefits for the next eight.

Posted by: Paul | May 9, 2008 10:57:14 AM

According to Obama backed John Kerry people in the military are too uneducated to attend college

Posted by: geevill | May 9, 2008 11:06:21 AM

Geevill - Obama is a co-sponsor of this new GI Bill, so that line of attack sounds pretty feeble. I suggest you stick to things his pastor said.

Posted by: Paul | May 9, 2008 11:08:51 AM

Don't learn, die.

Posted by: David Enock | May 9, 2008 11:20:36 AM

Missing the point Obama supporters. This is nothing but a recruitment tool .Doesn't help those already in Iraq.

Posted by: geevill | May 9, 2008 11:27:29 AM

great article Bill

Posted by: c.l.baugh | May 9, 2008 11:30:30 AM

great article Bill

Posted by: c.l.baugh | May 9, 2008 11:30:39 AM

Did I read Paul's comment correctly? According to Kerry, people in the military are too uneducated to go to College? Whoa.

People go to school to get an education. If they were already educationed, they wouldn't need to go to school.

The Webb bill will return America to its moral heights. Rather than having a mercenary force that fights solely for the money, we'll again have 'citizen soldiers' who fight for love of freedom and the opportunity to build a better America. Rather than just a paycheck for the work, they'll be offered opportunity to become educated, get a good job, raise a family, and earn a decent wage.

The neo-cons despise a non-indentured fighting force. They gnash their teeth at the idea soldiers becoming middle class and possibly taking money from the wealthy. This bill will begin to restore the middle class that is so hated by the authoritarian conservative Republicans.

Posted by: Kees | May 9, 2008 11:32:31 AM

Kees - that wasn't my comment.

Geevil - the new GI Bill absolutely does something for servicemembers in Iraq now. Despite whatever McCain is thinking, these kids aren't planning on being in Iraq forever. When they get back to the States, I'm sure many would like some assistance going to college.

Remember the original GI Bill was for guys coming back from World War II.

Posted by: Paul | May 9, 2008 11:36:44 AM

Well....the first mistake in this article is not representing the current GI Bill correctly. I am currently using the GI Bill and I get $1,101 per month if I go to school full time. This amount goes up each year. This more than covers the cost of going to the University of Mary Washington.

Posted by: Will | May 9, 2008 11:40:34 AM

So do you think that just because you are in the military you are uneducated?

Posted by: Michael | May 9, 2008 11:41:08 AM

This bill should be passed - and having Sen. Warner supporting it as well as Sen. Webb is good.

Who really supports the troops? A lot talk to the talk - but not as many are walking the walk. Except the soldiers, Marines and a few good Senators.

Posted by: GI's | May 9, 2008 11:43:11 AM

Why does nobody notice? McCain's solution for jobs and also for women who get paid less is "more education." Here's a bill to provide that "more education" to a particular class of US citizen and McCain is strongly against it.

(And, of course, many do notice that McCain sees "more education" as impeding the Cheney/Bush/McCain plans for protracted war because it provides exactly what McCain says is needed to attain a better, more competitive job. He doesn't say it outright but he implies it strongly: jobs that require a college degree have advantages over jobs in the military.)

Posted by: hewhoasks | May 9, 2008 11:52:25 AM

"You know, education, if you make the most of it, you study hard, you do your homework and you make an effort to be smart, you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq," Kerry said."

Posted by: geevill | May 9, 2008 11:54:28 AM

I have worked with former GI's of all the military branches and have the highest respect for the kind of education the military gives them. It doesn't matter what veteran of what war although the veterans of the Gulf war seemed to have more pride in their workmanship and discipline in the workplace than my contemporaries.

Posted by: karen | May 9, 2008 11:56:36 AM

Simple enough. Vote against increasing benefits, but make sure you always wear a flag pin. That way, no one can ever accuse you of failing to support the troops.

Posted by: Steve | May 9, 2008 11:58:17 AM

Problem with this is that Obama's liberal student and professor kick the ROTC off of campuses.

Posted by: geevill | May 9, 2008 12:00:14 PM

McCain better thoroughly analyze this one and support the troops in every effort possible. With the emphasis on a college degree, the US will not be able to continue to recruit soldiers without increasing this benefit. This is the kind of issue many Hillary supporters are watching you closely about, Senator McCain. Your decision on these matters can help sway your average white female mothers.

Posted by: Figure it out | May 9, 2008 12:00:51 PM

Gill - Bill Moyers continues to miss the point, as apparently do you. All three candidates have sought the support of religious leaders, some of whom are idiots part or all of the time, because all three understand that those religious leaders can move people to vote for them. What candidate Obama did by (a) sitting in Rev. Wright's church for all those years, and then exacerbated by (b) lying about 'what he heard when he heard it' was demonstrate his poor understanding of the opinions and beliefs of others. Competant politicians realize they can and will be judged on their behavior, and that they will face a higher bar than the average American thereby - so the circumscribe their actions to win the prize of office. Bad politicians (and other celebrities) complain that the public that watches them is mean and (gasp!)judgemental, claims we never hear when the public is adulatory instead.

If I heard that McCain had been a member of Rev. Hagee's church as long as Obama was a member of Rev. Wright's, I'd be just as mad at him as I am at Obama. Since he wasn't, I am only mildly displeased that he would associate himself with the Rev. Hagee for the sake of those votes.

Paul - I think you may want to pull back on the vitriol towards "neo-cons" - your hypothesizing about their inner thoughts and desires is at best unseemly. I'm a Republican, a veteran of the authoritarian US Marine Corps, and a conservative since I was a teenager - and I assure you that I don't despise anybody willing to serve. Did you do so, or are you hypothesizing there too?

Posted by: Haze | May 9, 2008 12:06:39 PM

Post a comment