a new name,

In which country? Or should I say world? Stop quoting the clown math, no one is buying it.

a new name: Hillary Clinton signed an agreement not to count FL and MI last year. Terry McAuliffe, a Rules and Committee member, warned and then followed through on his threat to FL and MI to strip them of their delegates if they moved up their primaries.

How do you explain that?

If that was a mistake not counting numbers in the first place, it ought be corrected.

I thought it was BHO who preaches CHANGE.

Why do you want to be so boneheaded to stick on a wrong decision and not correcting it after realization of the mistake? That reminds us something and someone familiar - BHO = GWB.

Here's out presumptive nominee:

120 out of 120.

That's the number of counties, lost, in Kentucky.

waitwaitwaitwait. Now you're saying it was a mistake?! THAT'S your argument? Really?

She signed an agreement!!! Her campaign manager was the one to ACTUALLY strip them of the delegates!!!

In the face of these irrefutable facts, you come up with THAT response?

That's pretty weak.

It's a mistake of the DNC.

WRONG. Terry McAuliffe HIMSELF warned the delegations acting on behalf of the DNC. Don't blame the DNC when most of the committee members are Clinton activists. Don't blame the DNC when Hillary Clinton HERSELF signed the agreement.

You can't have it both ways.

If the BHO was so far sighted, full of HOPE, CHANGE, where was his judgment following these obvious mistakes?

I did not see his criticizing the irresponsible decisions of the DNC. Rather, he took his name off the ballot, and then, winning he did not receive any votes.

Can someone teach him that if he took his name off the ballot of an election to pander the voters of Iowa and NH, he discarded these voters and he is bound not to get any votes?

Take just one single responsibility for what he has done.

a new name: All the candidates were STRONGLY urged to take their names off the ballot by the DNC, and as we know, the Clintons control that committee.

Clinton was the ONLY candidate to leave her name on. Everyone else followed the rules set by a committee controlled by her, and yet she did not follow her own committee's recommendation.

Can someone please teach HER about rules?

Anyone?

Anyone at all?

Texas Voter - It sounds like that HRC has a better judgment that BHO, by keeping her name ballot and demonstrating to the MI voters that she wants their votes.

I do not know what was said behind closed doors, and I do not see a single bit that BHO is so clean (oops, if you say he is clean you are a racist - hope, HOPE to say he is not clean will not be branded as a racist).

phony - So, let me get this straight. Her committee says take you name off. Barack complies (along with all other nominees at the time). She is the only one to leave her name on. She also at the time signed an agreement that MI and FL would not count. Terry McAuliffe, her campaign manger, strips the two states of their delegates.

Now, surprise surprise, she wants them to count, even though it was a mess of her DIRECT doing?

Are you serious? This is your big argument?

Please tell me you have something else. Please tell me you're not hanging your entire argument on this.

Texas Voter - First of all, nobody asked nobody to take their name off, and nobody asked nobody to abide the DNC rules. They all volunteered not to campaign in MI and FL. Secondly, it is not only HRC's name on the ballot. Thirdly, it is BHO who went one step further, along with a couple of other people, to take his name off the MI ballot, for no other reason but pandering Iowa voters to show that he is "more phony" to keep Iowa caucusing first. Fourth, BHO realized he made a mistake, and decided to keep his name on the ballot of FL. Fifth, since his name was on the ballot of FL, he started airing commercials in FL, breaking DNC rules. He was stopped because it was pointed out that he had been breaking rules, and he came out with a phony excuse as he does whenever he is criticized on his mistakes.

If any rules were broken, it is BHO who really broke the rules.

Oh, my, phony. That's so flimsy, I'm truly frightened to even respond.

First, you're right, Chris Dodd's name was also on the ballot. That was my mistake, and I apologize for my mistake.

Second, you say Obama advertised in FL. That is absolutely false. He was advertising on CNN. Not once did he break the rules, but just to avoid even a whiff of impropriety, he stopped. By the way, while we're on this subject, how do you explain Hillary's "fundraising" rally in Florida days before the primary, where she delivered a stump speech? THAT is breaking the rules, my friend, plain and simple.

All of this is moot, of course. Hillary signed an agreement that these delegates would not count, and it was her campaign manager, Terry McAuliffe, that actually warned MI and FL that they would be stripped.

Those are the FACTS, and they are irrefutable.

Texas -

My friend, I agree with you we are not going to agree.

But, let me rebut you one more time.

Breaking rules is breaking rules, whether you air advertisement on CNN or on BHO. He knew if he airs on CNN it will be seen by FL, so he does it. If you tell me BHO does not know, and his advisors do not know, then, you are telling they are so dumb that they do not know what they are doing. Then, I do not trust this phony to run the country. There were already 8 years of a phony who does not know what he is doing running this country.

Fund-raising in FL does not break rules. If you do not agree, check the rules.

I do not argue with you that BHO is or has stolen the nomination, but a mistake made by the DNC should be corrected, and CHANGED. You do not want to stick to mistakes while you know it is a mistake, do you, or does BHO?

Ted Stevens R not from ARK; but AK

Yu al say the Clinton's are the greatest politicians in the world, but between them they have an impeachment(one of only 2 in U.S. history) and a spectacular failure in an election that she thought she had a divine right to. How many other new standards are you going to come up with to determine the outcome? It doesn't matterhow many counties Obama lost in Kentucky or WV for that matter. Likewise the overall popular vote is irrelevant. It's DELEGATES, stupid! If you don't like the system then try to Obama-proof it in 2012

Hey Obama, I think people who break rules should be punished. Since, you being a Harvard man conveniently "didn't know" that your NATIONAL AD showing in FL was not allowed (please!), and so you campaigned; you should not get a choice in how many delegates it is fair to have or not. For breaking the rules!

another fact check Ark is the the old abbreviation for Arkansas. AR is the current one. AK is for Alaska which has no Rs in it.

Senator TED STevens is an R from Alaska not Arkansas. Lots of folks make this error.

There's the Arkansas-Alaska mistake, and then there's the Akaka mistake. Akaka has only been in the Senate since 1990. Z. Bryon Wolf has confused Akaka with Inouye. Why can't we have a better press corps?