- White House Reacts to Bob Woodward Book; Revelatory ABC News Interview From 2006
- Biden Blasts 'Deafening' Republican Silence on Key Issues
- In First Official Party Ticket Appearance, Palin Comes Out Swinging
- McCain Green Screen -- By Design or Accident?
- The Note: McCain Takes Fight to Obama’s Turf
- Police Clash with Demonstrators, Make Arrests at RNC
- Obama: Surge Succeeded But Too Costly
- Report: McCain Rips Bush in Woodward Book
- Rove: Palin Could Be Worth Three Points for McCain
- Obama Camp: It's not 1988
- Biden calls Palin 'Lieutenant Governor'
- Potential "First Dude" Todd Palin Speaks at Cindy McCain Tribute
- Lott: McCain 'Not a Great Orator'; Speech Won't Top Palin's
- The Note: Palin a Hit, and McCain Bats Next
- Biden's Gloves Come Off ... Against 'Sexist' Media
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Richardson, Bill
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« 'Let's Move Forward', Axelrod Says of Clinton RFK Gaffe | Main | Clinton: No Preference in Status of Puerto Rico »
Rove Speaks Out on Subpoena
May 25, 2008 12:12 PM
ABC News' Mary Bruce reports: Karl Rove spoke out for the first time this morning on his subpoena from the House Judiciary Committee to testify on any involvement he may have had with the prosecution of former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman. While Siegelman claims there was selective prosecution, Bush's former deputy chief of staff was adamant that he learned of the Siegelman case from the press.
"I'm going to simply say what I've said before, which is I found out about Don Siegelman's investigation and indictment by reading about it in the newspaper," Rove said in an exclusive "This Week" interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos.
According to the House report, "In May 2007, a Republican attorney for northern Alabama, named Jill Simpson, wrote an affidavit stating that, in November 2002, she heard a prominent Alabama Republican operative named Bill Canary say that Karl Rove had contacted the Justice Department about bringing a prosecution of Don Siegelman. The question for Mr. Rove is whether he directly or indirectly discussed the possibility of prosecuting Don Siegelman with either the Justice Department or Alabama Republicans."
But when Stephanopoulos noted that Rove was not offering up a firm denial of any involvement with the Justice Department, Rove asserted, "I heard about it, read about it, learned about it for the first time by reading about it in the newspaper.”
May 25, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (22)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/433071/29444640
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rove Speaks Out on Subpoena :
Rove is the personification of Ivory Soap pure innocence. Ha ha ha ha ha.
Posted by: ericmiami | May 25, 2008 12:43:55 PM
I can see it now....
"mr. rove, did you ever contact the justice department in any way to discuss the possible prosecution of the governor?"
"Well... what I can say is that the first time I learned the fact he was being prosecuted, I read about that in the paper.."
Posted by: Timbo | May 25, 2008 1:05:54 PM
Leanred about what the first time? That he was actually indicted? So what - that has nothing to do with whether Rove was invovled with getting him indicted.
Rove is mincing words. A form of lying.
Posted by: G | May 25, 2008 1:21:45 PM
Once again Rove insults the intelligence of the American people.
Rove has no respect for Americans.
Posted by: G | May 25, 2008 1:22:59 PM
How much wasted time and money is spent on things that are not as important as fixing national security, social security, the FAA, IRS, etc., etc? Politicians never focus on what is best for the nation. They want to be the next soap opra on television! JERKS!
Posted by: Ken Burrows | May 25, 2008 1:27:35 PM
When Bill Clinton was elected he fired all of the Federal prosecutors. Did he have a good reason for firing each of them? Why is it an issue that Bush did it and not Bill Clinton?
This seems another cause of Democrats and Republicans doing the same thing, but when the republican does it, it automatically becomes a crime!
Posted by: Heather | May 25, 2008 1:46:00 PM
Just another quick comment. Isn't this what all these Democrats got elected to do? Endless hearings on things that matter to no one? Baseball, football etc etc.
These hearings should not be covered on a serious news channel as a waste of time. They should be on a comedy channel!
Posted by: Heather | May 25, 2008 1:47:58 PM
Heather, do you mean hearings like the ultra ridiculous impeachment of Clinton that the Republicans spent millions of dollars and endless hours on in the late 1990s. Especially since they knew in advance that their efforts would fail and Clinton would remain. I would be ashamed to call myself a Republican right now.
Posted by: JRS | May 25, 2008 1:51:49 PM
Karl Rove is everything that we do not want in American politics. His evil actions have polluted our government.
Posted by: Vicki | May 25, 2008 2:07:05 PM
Heather,
Clinton fired his judges in the beginning of his term, like most Presidents do. Bush fired his judges because they would not agree to conduct investigations that were petty and partisan and to his(and turdblossom's)liking.
Posted by: Don Nelson | May 25, 2008 2:08:57 PM
Anyone can get subpoened. Big deal. What makes democrats mad is that Rove never got into any trouble that they claimed he would. Poor things, they were so devastated.
Jon Meachum, editor at Newsweek admits that now that Karl Rove works part time for them, much to their surprise, he's very popular there. Everyone likes him. Shock - he's not the devil the liberal media portrayed him to be!
LOL.
Posted by: Jo | May 25, 2008 2:11:49 PM
Don,
Clinton did nothing of the sort.
1. Federal judges cannot be fired by a resident. They are appointed for life. Clinton fired federal prosecutors.
2. Clinton was the first president to sack his federal prosecutors en mass. Until 1992, this was not "normal" practice.
3. In addition to the 93 prosecutors initially replaced at the onset of Clinton's term, he also replaced approximately 30 more. Admittedly, there were a range of reasons for this and some were deservedly replaced (i.e., the person who was photographed grabbing a reported by the throat, for instance)
4. You have to be utterly niavite to believe that personal politics was also not at the root of Clinton's decision.
Posted by: Parkbandit | May 25, 2008 2:21:18 PM
This is not about separation of powers as Karl Rove suggests. Instead, it is about targeting political opponents using the justice department in order to influence elections. Now ABC news needs to investigate the claims of voter caging, voter fraud, and the firing of the US attorneys. It's clear to those who have paid attention that these scandals are all related. The question is why aren't Karl Rove and Alberto Gonzales in jail.
Posted by: dasvidana | May 25, 2008 3:38:05 PM
I cannot you believe that you give Rove a forum. He is nothing more than a traitor and a criminal and IS advising McCain and should not be treated as an impartial analyst. Do not degrade your program by having this man on anymore.
Posted by: Jennifer Hille | May 25, 2008 11:30:48 PM
How about we give Rove the benefit of the doubt?
If he is guilty, it will be proven. Just like the Plame witch hunt, Rove was not involved, and that was proven after an exhaustive investigation.
I realize it gets the Dems all excited to think that they may get a shot at Rove, but until someone actually charges him with something that has some merit, everyone should just get of his back.
Maybe they should sit back and watch his analysis on Fox, the man actually has some great insights into politics and government, and maybe that is why Bush got 2 terms, not because Rove stole elections.
Posted by: j 2 the b | May 26, 2008 2:46:19 PM
j2theb, you need to do your homework. Rove orchestrated a multi-state plan to have millions of votes thrown out, giving Bush two elections. Check out Greg Palast's "Armed Madhouse" to find out the details. The evidence is there, but the justice dept won't pursue it because up until now, they have also been loyal Bushies.
Posted by: dasvidana | May 26, 2008 5:04:26 PM
LOL!
Posted by: yoli | May 26, 2008 10:47:07 PM
R.I.P. The U.S.A Republic.
Posted by: Jared Lorz | May 27, 2008 4:03:15 AM
They lied to get elected, they promised they would not do what they have been doing. But they had a mission, an that was to get the PResident, an especially Karl Rove. Look at all the wasted time an money the Dem controlled Congress has done. Its no wonder the economy started taking a nose dive after they took control. This Nov, we need to throw them ALL out, both partys. Then make the new ones sign a pledge that they will Drill for oil an build refineries, so we can then figure out alternatives. Start feeling for the little guy for once besides pandering for their votes, an then kicking them aside after you get elected.
Posted by: homjett | May 27, 2008 9:32:57 AM
Hearing Cheney say “the campaign was over and that our actions in office would not be dictated by what had to be said in the campaign,” Chafee writes, was “the most demoralizing moment of my seven-year tenure in the Senate.”
Seeing republicans still supporting these criminals with no knowledge of the facts is a sad day in America. Rove is at the fore front. Look at where we are now. Our country is desimated and they're okay with it. Idiots supporting liars.
Posted by: Jason R | May 30, 2008 11:57:14 AM
The prosecution of Don Siegelman was a tragedy. Rove is another McCarthy-ite fascist and is NOT above the law.
Posted by: notLAneMore | Jul 10, 2008 12:36:09 PM
Someone in this discussion vein suggested that reporting on this matter was a waste of time, a purely political exercise, and that we should be directing our attention to other, more vital matters for the nation. Please be reminded that, should be allow officials in office to be subjected to false accusations and prosecutions for drummed up crimes they did not commit in order for opposing politicians to have them removed from office, we in turn will be no better off that people in a dictatorship. We have to care about things like what Rove has orchestrated here, and we must keep caring, and we must keep reporting when things like this happen. We call that "democracy."
Posted by: Caribel | Jul 10, 2008 12:43:04 PM
Post a comment



