- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Elizabeth Edwards Says Mandates Are Best Way to Achieve Universal Healthcare
June 27, 2008 4:54 PM
ABC News' Molly Hunter Reports: Elizabeth Edwards, who is advising the Obama campaign on healthcare issues, reiterated Friday that she believes adopting Sen. Hillary Clinton’s healthcare plan would be the best way to cover all Americans.
"In my view, that is the most assured way to get there," Edwards said of Clinton's plan.
Edwards, who endorsed Clinton’s healthcare plan during the late months of the primary, has consistently advocated for the use of individual mandates to ensure universal health care.
However, in an interview with ABC News, she didn't rule out other ways of reaching universal health care coverage without the use of mandates.
"The truth is universality is the goal. And I can’t be close-minded enough to think that there is only one way … Is that the only way? Even with mandates you probably are not going to get 100 percent, you are still going to have outliers," Edwards said, noting that there are other ways to get close to universal coverage.
Presumptive Democratic nominee Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has proposed requiring most employers to make a "meaningful contribution" to covering their employees through private insurance or contribute to a public health plan. Obama would also require parents to insure their children.
Edwards told ABC News it's important to look at the incentives and automatic ways of enrolling people. Edwards is open to the idea of looking into the other ways of triggering enrollment.
"If he wants to be creative then that’s fine," she said of Obama. "I’m willing to listen to the ideas that [the Obama campaign] has."
Obama announced on June 9 that he planned to partner with Edwards to "figure it all out" on healthcare.
Edwards said she has begun to speak with Obama’s policy advisors and participate in conference calls with the campaign. She said she expects to do much more.
Edwards said she is optimistic Obama will address healthcare quickly if he's elected president. She said she hopes Obama will take lessons from the Clinton's failed 1993 healthcare reform effort and tackle the issue during his first 100 days in office.
"I think there is a real opportunity," Edwards said. "I think he can use that moment of the most heat to accomplish something."
June 27, 2008 in Bush, George W., Kucinich, Dennis, Tancredo, Tom | Permalink | User Comments (13)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Woot thank god for obama looking out for us small people
like the big corps need any more tax breaks
Posted by: bhrandon | Jun 27, 2008 5:23:37 PM
I think mandated health care will leave 46 million people who can't afford health care paying for something resembling health care, but wuill deliver so little they will not be able to affoprd to use it.
Posted by: Thinking | Jun 27, 2008 5:37:18 PM
And if your high risk it will be like no fault car insurance when it was mandated in the seventy's I hope they at least give people jobs so they can afford to pay for it when your paying $1000.00 amonth for everthing and anything just what is going to break the Camels back oh never mind it is already broken.
Posted by: Bishop | Jun 27, 2008 6:21:10 PM
It's hard to conceptualize universal health care without the mandates. Social security exists because of the mandate to pay into it. I would like to hear more of the Obama plan, but the more important issues are getting drowned out by the political contention between him and McCain.
Posted by: kat | Jun 27, 2008 6:28:00 PM
Why not just make those that make more than, say, $200,000 pay for the insurance of those that make less than $200,000. That's the fair way to do it. People having all that extra money can spare a little for their fellow man. Obama believes in taxing high earners to provide other social benefits, why not health care as well?
Posted by: Karl | Jun 27, 2008 6:49:47 PM
Mary, which planet are you from? You don't realize that a lot if not all those real rich people got that way from taking in away from the little guy. My husband is living proof of that. Isn't that why manufacturers moved out of the country so they could line their pockets a little thicker? Not everyone falls into that one category you want to put them in. There are lots of different situations.
Posted by: Dee Jay | Jun 27, 2008 10:56:37 PM
Healthcare is a boondogle for insurance companies who manipulate the stock market, pharmacutical companies who are freezing out competition and those who rip off the system as it is.
Government workers, including senators, have a great insurance plan. What incentive do they have to change it? When they retire they still keep their benefits.
Politicians' campaigns are funded by the same money-making gang, so where's their incentive?
With boomers getting ready to retire, their reduced numbers of offspring will be paying most of their paychecks to Social Security and Medicare, which many doctors will be forced to deny due to the lowering renumerations.
So bottom line, suck it up and let the one person who really understands it fix it. The one person I believe Can and Will fix it is Hillary Clinton. Everyone else is intimidated by it. And any politician who leads you away from her plan should be scrutinized closely for undercutting the future of this country.
Posted by: Donna Davidson | Jun 28, 2008 9:58:24 AM
K Phan: she did - you weren't listening apparently.
Posted by: MIguy | Jun 28, 2008 1:18:02 PM
Medicare for all is the only way to actually get to universal care.
It does no good to mandate enrollment for people who can't afford to cough up $10-20,000 a year.
We need to make Medicare the basic system of the country and then use insurance to cover catastrophic illnesses.
Posted by: Steve Hovland | Jun 29, 2008 10:35:29 AM
Look at your pay stub.
You are already paying for Medicare, but you don't get it if you are younger than 65.
Posted by: Steve Hovland | Jun 29, 2008 10:37:06 AM
Do I care what Elizabeth Edwards says about healthcare???? NO.
Why does anyone care for that matter. Her and her husband are all about the glory of themselves. I, at one time, did like them. Now.. I do not.
Posted by: MJL | Jun 29, 2008 12:39:28 PM
Mandating health insurance is an extra tax on the young poor and healthy to pay for the old sick and wealthy. When I was in my 20's and between jobs, I gave up my health insurance for a few months. It kept me out of bankrupcy. Had I had to pay anything for healthcare, I would have gone bankrupt before I got my job. I probably could have qualified for healthy assistance but what they felt I could pay was less than I felt I could pay.
Foolish advocates and press say mandates bring down the cost of healthcare by adding healthy people into the insurance pool. That is false. The sick people still cost the same but now the healthy will be forced to pay for the sick.
Posted by: X marks the spot | Jun 30, 2008 11:25:57 AM
Posted by: 91zdbqpwdpvr2gplq | Oct 13, 2008 11:51:31 AM
Post a comment



