- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
McCain Backtracks on Social Security Tax Hike
June 10, 2008 7:34 PM
ABC News' Teddy Davis and Gregory Wallace Report: Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., hammered Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., on Tuesday for proposing higher Social Security taxes. The presumptive Republican nominee neglected to mention, however, that he was open to a similar approach in 2005.
"The Social Security tax cap, he wants to raise from $105,000 to I think $200,000," McCain told Bloomberg News' Peter Cook. "Do you know how many employers, small-business people that would mean a 12-percent increase in their Social Security tax?"
" I mean, this is just -- Senator Obama wants to raise taxes," he continued. "I want to keep tax cuts in place. And I think that it’s important that in a time of real crisis, economic crisis in America, the last thing we want to do is raise people’s taxes now."
On a Feb., 23, 2005, edition of "Meet the Press," NBC's Tim Russert asked McCain if he would support "as part of the solution to Social Security's solvency problem, that you lift the cap so that you would pay payroll tax, Social Security tax, not just on the first $90,000 of your income, but perhaps even higher?"
“As part of a compromise," said McCain, "I could, and other sacrifices, because we all know that it doesn't add up until we make some very serious and fundamental changes.”
Two years later, during a May 13, 2007, appearance on "Meet the Press," Russert asked McCain if he was still open to lifting the Social Security tax cap as part of a compromise.
The Arizona senator said that he is opposed to tax increases while acknowledging that "tough decisions" would be needed as part of a compromise.
"Am I opposed to tax increases?" said McCain. "Yes. But we've got to sit down together and figure out what our options are, and tough decisions have to be made, Republicans and Democrats. And I know how to do that."
Asked about the 2005 remark, a McCain spokesman acknowledged the tension with his current position while arguing that the Arizona senator's criticism of his Democratic rival is still valid because McCain has spoken out against higher Social Security taxes as a 2008 White House hopeful.
“The contrast here couldn’t be more clear, and pulling one dated quote out of thousands won’t change it," McCain adviser Brian Rogers told ABC News. "John McCain believes we can fix Social Security without raising taxes. Senator Obama has made clear his intention to uncap the payroll tax, raising taxes while failing to restore the program’s long-term solvency.”
To put the retirement program on sounder footing, Obama has suggested imposing the 12.4 percent Social Security tax on more income.
At present, the tax is only imposed on roughly the first $100,000 of income.
In a 2007 op-ed written for an Iowa newspaper, Obama floated the possibility of completing eliminating the Social Security tax cap.
More recently, Obama and his advisers have said on multiple occasions that he would continue to exempt income between roughly $100,000 and around $200,000 from the Social Security tax while imposing it on income above $200,000.
June 10, 2008 in Hunter, Duncan, Kucinich, Dennis | Permalink | User Comments (41)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Who is McCain?
He has flip flopped on almost all the issues.
He definitely isn't the 2000 McCain but now he is the flip flopper McCain in 2008.
Posted by: Alan | Jun 10, 2008 7:41:05 PM
McCain wants to privatize social security which is what the vast majority of Americans do NOT want.
Posted by: Stacey | Jun 10, 2008 7:42:51 PM
He said that all options needed to be looked at before a decision could be made. What is wrong with that statement? Because that is exactly what Barack Hussein Obama has to do as well. So you and the MSM stop berating Senator McCain.
Why don't you tell me what you would do? What is your solution - And just how would you put it in place and make it work?
I'll wager you cannot answer this because you don't know how.
Posted by: CalifLady36 | Jun 10, 2008 7:48:53 PM
I understand McCain flip-flopped on estate taxes, too.
I don't know how many more flip-flops that straight-talk express can take without voiding the bus's warranty.
Posted by: Paul | Jun 10, 2008 8:10:49 PM
McCain is a real man.
Obama is a puppet of the far left.
That's all one needs to know!
Posted by: Soetoro No! | Jun 10, 2008 8:13:39 PM
tomdavie - he also never said he wanted to scrap social security, and he never said he wanted to bomb Pakistan.
Arguing with Republicans and their supporters would be more fun if those guys knew what they were talking about.
Oh, and the Pakistan thing has actually been done since the time Obama recommended it... by the Bush administration. We ran three separate strikes in northern Pakistan, and in one of them have a "high confidence" of hitting our target.
McCain, like Clinton, called Obama naive for suggesting this, though a flip later was saying he would follow bin Laden "to the gates of Hell." Well, bin Laden isn't in Hell. He's in Pakistan. McCain basically echoed Obama's idea, which he previously had characterized as naive.
I wonder if McCain can even track all these flip-flops.
Posted by: Paul | Jun 10, 2008 8:15:15 PM
By the way, the distinction here (though I'm sure McCain supporters won't care) is that Obama doesn't "want" to bomb Pakistan. If actionable intelligence pointed to bin Laden's location, he wants Pakistan to arrest bin Laden.
Its only if Pakistan was unable or unwilling to do so that Obama suggested we not let bin Laden slip away... again.
Posted by: Paul | Jun 10, 2008 8:17:01 PM
Why won't Obama agree to town hall debates? ANSWER: Because he's a bumbling idiot who doesn't know what he believes until his puppet masters have put it in front of him on the TelePrompter.
What an empty suit!
Posted by: Soetoro No! | Jun 10, 2008 8:23:34 PM
tomdavie: The US has already sent a few missiles into the NW Frontier of Pakistan. It is not an area for troops or tanks to go into. Even the Pakistan military dread it. Look at some pictures of the terrain. Treacherous and that is why Bin Laden and/or his henchmen are camping out there. There are now so many rumored tapes going around concerning Obama that they would fill a media library. Even Rush Limbaugh will not touch that Sinclair Lewis garbage because it is such an amateur job and there is not much he will avoid. But, did McCain really misspeak and say that he would veto beer?!
Posted by: KiwiTricia | Jun 10, 2008 8:25:25 PM
I would like mc-more-war to answer one question. Why did it take him so long to denounce the hagee endorsement? There are a lot of Catholic voters that will remember this in November. Obama 2008 will be GREAT!!!
Posted by: pt | Jun 10, 2008 8:34:03 PM
The thing that's funny about Soetoro's posts are that by trying to convince us all that Obama is a puppet, we're reminded of how puppets look and move... which naturally makes one think of McCain.
I realize that's a cheap shot. McCain lost a lot of arm movement when his arms were broken and then presumably never set correctly the entire time he was a POW. But still... McCain supporters, I suggest you not stick to the puppet attack.
Posted by: Paul | Jun 10, 2008 8:36:03 PM
pt - I know. I'm Catholic. I try to not get involved in those kinds of stories - the guilt by association crap. But I couldn't help noticing that McCain only rejected Hagee after a different comment was unearthed on tape. The implication was that McCain was okay with the whore comment about the Catholic Church.
Someone should remind the McCain folks that Catholics are 22 percent of the population, and I believe vote more reliably than average - meaning we do represent something like a quarter of the electorate.
Posted by: Paul | Jun 10, 2008 8:39:32 PM
Paul,
I agree with your point of guilt by association is crap. But, mc-more-war knew what he said and still would not denounce it because he knew a lot of people look to hagee for advice. I used to have respect for mccain but since the 2000 election he's become a pandering wimp. Obama 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | Jun 10, 2008 8:45:11 PM
In other words McCain is a hypocrite, woop-de-DAMN-do!
Posted by: patriot | Jun 10, 2008 8:54:22 PM
sotorolamo or whatever your name is
he has agreed to town hall meetings they are working it out... stop spreading your lies
and mccain flip flops more then a fish out of water
please this guys running on experience? lol to quote him
"hes hte change candidate:
Posted by: bhrandon | Jun 10, 2008 9:20:14 PM
I think Obama said it very well today.
When talking about taxes and comparing McCain to George Bush, that isn't fair --- to Bush.
What does McCain stand for? Its hard to follow his changing position without a scorecard. One position he hasn't changed, though, is his intent to give billions in tax breaks to the big oil companies, the ones premiering the new price hike horrors at your friendly neighborhood gas station.
Defeat McCain in '08.
Posted by: Marie33 | Jun 10, 2008 9:22:56 PM
Lets abolish ssi. I did the right thing and saved my money. And the money I paid in is my money and I want that back.
SSI is and will never be a retirement System It is a safety net. So you better start saving or you will never retire.
Posted by: Dakota | Jun 10, 2008 10:15:03 PM
@Dakota: Of course, you are right, that it is a safety net and people should just save on their own. However, the problem is what happens when they don't? The rest of us will have to bail out the ones who didn't save and that may be more expensive the Social Security (which is in essence a pooled, mandatory saving). The alternative, homeless and poor elderly, is not an acceptable option.
Posted by: MIguy | Jun 10, 2008 10:25:06 PM
Poor McCain- one year he's for something, the next year, when it suits him, he's against it. Unfortunately, he's done this with many, many policy ideas and positions. Such is the nature of an indecisive and insecure politician, always reshaping himself to the whims of the electorate. Shameful. At least Obama's positions, be they right or wrong, are amazingly consistent. His vision of America, again be it right or wrong, is one that favors the poor and the middle class at the expense of the wealthy. If this ideology suits your personal financial situation, then vote for Obama. If you are part of the few of us in the super -wealthy group, or a mega corporation like the oil companies, then you might want to vote for McCain. Of course, you never know what you're ultimately going to get with McCain, because he might change his mind, or as he is want to do so often, take direction from the lobbyists that have propped him up in office. He is and always has been a puppet of the lobbyists, even through the current election cycle. He needs their money and support, as no one else wants to help him.
As they said in the signature line in the movie Minority Report- "Can you see?"
Posted by: Tim | Jun 10, 2008 10:31:53 PM
So let me get this straight. McCain's campaign says that the reason it doesn't matter that McCain changed his position is that previously, he wasn't running for President, but now he is? So when was he telling the truth, then or now?
Whereas Obama, in the face of a Social Security financial crisis, consistently proposes a "tough" plan that raises some taxes on the highest earners but STILL exempts those earning over about $100k from being taxed on all their income, unlike the rest of us, who pay taxes on every dollar we earn? Meantime, Social Security is about to go broke for the common folks who need it most (remember the "lock box"?).
But I guess if you marry an heiress, like McCain did, you don't really have to worry about Social Security being there for you.
Posted by: Keith | Jun 10, 2008 10:37:09 PM
Post a comment



