- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
McCain Backtracks on Social Security Tax Hike
June 10, 2008 7:34 PM
ABC News' Teddy Davis and Gregory Wallace Report: Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., hammered Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., on Tuesday for proposing higher Social Security taxes. The presumptive Republican nominee neglected to mention, however, that he was open to a similar approach in 2005.
"The Social Security tax cap, he wants to raise from $105,000 to I think $200,000," McCain told Bloomberg News' Peter Cook. "Do you know how many employers, small-business people that would mean a 12-percent increase in their Social Security tax?"
" I mean, this is just -- Senator Obama wants to raise taxes," he continued. "I want to keep tax cuts in place. And I think that it’s important that in a time of real crisis, economic crisis in America, the last thing we want to do is raise people’s taxes now."
On a Feb., 23, 2005, edition of "Meet the Press," NBC's Tim Russert asked McCain if he would support "as part of the solution to Social Security's solvency problem, that you lift the cap so that you would pay payroll tax, Social Security tax, not just on the first $90,000 of your income, but perhaps even higher?"
“As part of a compromise," said McCain, "I could, and other sacrifices, because we all know that it doesn't add up until we make some very serious and fundamental changes.”
Two years later, during a May 13, 2007, appearance on "Meet the Press," Russert asked McCain if he was still open to lifting the Social Security tax cap as part of a compromise.
The Arizona senator said that he is opposed to tax increases while acknowledging that "tough decisions" would be needed as part of a compromise.
"Am I opposed to tax increases?" said McCain. "Yes. But we've got to sit down together and figure out what our options are, and tough decisions have to be made, Republicans and Democrats. And I know how to do that."
Asked about the 2005 remark, a McCain spokesman acknowledged the tension with his current position while arguing that the Arizona senator's criticism of his Democratic rival is still valid because McCain has spoken out against higher Social Security taxes as a 2008 White House hopeful.
“The contrast here couldn’t be more clear, and pulling one dated quote out of thousands won’t change it," McCain adviser Brian Rogers told ABC News. "John McCain believes we can fix Social Security without raising taxes. Senator Obama has made clear his intention to uncap the payroll tax, raising taxes while failing to restore the program’s long-term solvency.”
To put the retirement program on sounder footing, Obama has suggested imposing the 12.4 percent Social Security tax on more income.
At present, the tax is only imposed on roughly the first $100,000 of income.
In a 2007 op-ed written for an Iowa newspaper, Obama floated the possibility of completing eliminating the Social Security tax cap.
More recently, Obama and his advisers have said on multiple occasions that he would continue to exempt income between roughly $100,000 and around $200,000 from the Social Security tax while imposing it on income above $200,000.
June 10, 2008 in Hunter, Duncan, Kucinich, Dennis | Permalink | User Comments (41)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Obama couldn't pass a background check to work for the government with his connections.
Obama connections to ayres, wright, father pfleger, rezko, kamidi a hamas supporter.
Posted by: david | Jun 10, 2008 10:56:36 PM
John McCain:
Do you think there is a problem with Social Security? Where will you find the money and/or cut the outflow of cash?
During the last 20 years, the Gross Domestic Product -- the nations wealth -- has doubled in this country. Somehow the wealthy have received ALL of the benefit of this and the middle class has received NONE.
So when it comes to shoring up Social Security, Obama has made a constructive suggestion, taking off the make-no-more-contributions limit that applies only to the wealthiest of Americans.
Where does John McCain want to get the money? Not from the wealthy. From the struggling middle class, that's where!
Posted by: conscience | Jun 10, 2008 11:00:15 PM
To Jake Tapper
Obama is the one who flip flopped and showed hypocricy.
Obama went after Clinton for changing her position on social security taxes
Obama is the one changing positons. First he said he was for doing away with the cap then changed his positon to 100,000 to 200,000.
McCain only said he knew there would have to be negotiations to get a deal done.
Obama is the one who laid down a marker went after Clinton.
But somehow the media bashes McCain.
This is not a democracy. MSNBC is the Obama channel.
The media is so in the tank for Obama it is like Russia controlled media when Putin when he was there and now his lacky.
Posted by: david | Jun 10, 2008 11:02:41 PM
After I read this.. I think about it every time I see McCain... McCain could actually be much worse than Bush.
"Will McCain, who finished 894th out of 899 at the Naval Academy and who lost five jets, return competence to the White House? To paraphrase Oscar Wilde (and, no, Oscar was never a fighter pilot), to lose one plane over Vietnam may be regarded as a heroic tragedy; to lose five planes here and there looks like carelessness."
Posted by: jim | Jun 10, 2008 11:28:45 PM
@MV: Hasselbeck is the feel good story for the View. She makes us all feel good that there is someone dumber on the planet than we are.
Posted by: MIguy | Jun 10, 2008 11:35:30 PM
Hannah,
You are so sad. Obama is ahead in the polls and is ahead in Dollars raised--- You know, the same position Hillary was in before this process started. The difference is, Obama is smarter than Hillary is and will run circles around Old Man McCain--- Just like he did with Old Lady Hillary.
Posted by: DemsUnited | Jun 11, 2008 1:20:39 AM
Huckabee or Mit Romney would have been far better than McCain as the Rep nominee.His military background aside,McCain is too flawed a candidate.Anyway he is still the presumptive nominee though i doubt that can be changed.
Posted by: Independent | Jun 11, 2008 3:10:34 AM
I bet you that if millions marched against the war in Iraq, McCain would jump to the front of the line and claim he was also against the war and would end it if he became President. This guy will say anything to get elected. What's next...oh, if he can find enough votes, he'll say he's for talking to Iran, N Korea, Cuba, the devil without any preconditions.
Posted by: Jake | Jun 11, 2008 7:19:06 AM
McCain has a better tax plan than Obama. He's offering almost $3600 increase per child per family. That's huge for young families. He also has a better estate tax plan. First 5 million goes free, than taxed at a flat rate of 15%. Obama's estate tax is taxable after the first million. Obama's plan doesn't compare.
Posted by: bluebird | Jun 11, 2008 8:03:07 AM
It's becoming ever clearer who is the real change candidate. McCain flips his principles on just about anything and everything, practically on a daily basis. I mean c'mon... flipping on the torture issue was simply too weird! Either he a) doesn't think anyone will notice, b) doesn't believe anyone will care or, c) he's losing his memory.
Posted by: pt | Jun 11, 2008 8:34:46 AM
Yesterday, McCain while speaking to a group of "small businesses" he said he would "veto any beer", then corrected himself by say he would veto any bill. I guess he was thinking about his wife's beer business as a "small business" that he wants to give tax breaks. Yeah, his wife's business is a small business just like my local pizza parlor or my grocery store...yeah, guess these local business owners are rich too like his wife...sure.
Posted by: Jake | Jun 11, 2008 10:26:16 AM
Does McCain ever say anything that he doesn't contradict days, months or years later? In 2004, the Republicans screamed "flip flop! Flip Flop!" about John Kerry. Now they want us to believe that flip flopping on issues is a strength. The ultimate flip flop, indeed.
Posted by: AppeaseThis | Jun 11, 2008 1:11:27 PM
The guy is full of hot air! I can't believe what I just heard. The lives of our troops are not important. Getting them back to their families is not important...One life compared to 20 taken is the most important thing in Iraq. Shame on you...one life compromised in this cooked up war is not worth anything. I wish he knows how despicable he sounds.
This is a good example of why this guy is not fit to lead this country let alone to understand how Social Security works!!
Posted by: Dan | Jun 11, 2008 1:51:07 PM
Yep, McCain can promise to not raise Social Security taxes but solve its looming crisis. But where is his solution for it. Will he raise retirement age to 70? Will he cut benefits paid? Will he privatize it which turns retirees benefits into a gambling on stocks proposition? What will he do?
Posted by: Lydia | Jun 12, 2008 1:47:32 AM
david:
You hit the nail right on the head!
Excellent, well informed, post!
Posted by: reaganfan | Jun 12, 2008 4:10:28 PM
Republicans use racist fear of the black man while they continue to screw over whites and everyone else as they laugh all the way to the bank.
Yep, republicans are counting on whites to ignore 7 years of getting screwed without vaseline because they think fear of blacks will trump any problems they have with bush/cheney and mccain.
Posted by: geevil | Jun 13, 2008 12:52:10 AM
Paul said "McCain, like Clinton, called Obama naive for suggesting this, though a flip later was saying he would follow bin Laden "to the gates of Hell." Well, bin Laden isn't in Hell. He's in Pakistan."
I've been to Pakistan, confusing it with hell is an honest mistake.
Posted by: t-bone | Jun 13, 2008 11:05:45 AM
Obama has been very clear about the principle of solving the ss problem: Lift the cap for paying ss taxes so that everyone, not just working folks, pay the taxes. Problem solved--no other changes need be made.
A recent analysis shown on cnn showed people earning under $66,000 per year will pay SUBSTANTIALLY less tax under Obama's plan. Up to $200,000 there was no difference between Obama and McCain but over $200,000 families will pay substantially less under McCain. Same old same old--take care of the rich.
Posted by: DuaneBidoux | Jun 13, 2008 7:12:33 PM
Social Security is a poor mans tax, but it should be paid by all for all income levels. The rich should not be able to draw a max amount of SS but less as there retirement income rises. The SS amount should be based on the previous years tax return earnings. It was never intended as a sole support for retirees. But thanks to the liberals and the idea that the Government can take care of us it has been hijacked.
Posted by: Neal | Jun 14, 2008 1:35:34 PM
McCain = BUSH and America can not afford another 4 years of BUSH..
Posted by: lucky | Jun 16, 2008 9:00:31 PM
Post a comment



