« Previous | Main | Next »

Baker and Christopher: Replace 'War Powers Act'

Share

July 08, 2008 2:31 PM

ABC News' Teddy Davis and Gregory Wallace Report: Former Secretaries of State James Baker and Warren Christopher recommended Tuesday that the 1973 War Powers Act be replaced by a new law that would provide for more meaningful consultation between the president and Congress.

"It's ineffective a best; unconstitutional at worst," said Baker, referring to the 1973 resolution that Congress passed over President Nixon's veto.  "The rule of law is undermined and is damaged when the main statute in this vital policy area is regularly questioned or ignored."

Speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill, Baker and Christopher stressed that the unanimous recommendation of the bipartisan National War Powers Commission they chaired was not in response to the Iraq war which was authorized by a vote of Congress.

Baker and Christopher sidestepped which previous U.S. military actions did not exhibit consultation between the executive and legislative branches.

"We have tried very hard not to call balls and strikes on past history," said Christopher.

Following the press conference, a member of the commission's staff told ABC News that the proposed statute, if it had been in place, would have boosted the president's consultation of Congress during military actions in Kosovo, Panama, Lebanon, Grenada, and the missile strikes on Libyan leader Muammar el-Qaddafi.

The War Powers Act, which was passed in response to the Vietnam War, was intended to formalize a role for Congress in making the decision whether to go to war. Critics of the law believe that it has had the unintended effect of giving presidents free rein to conduct any military action for 90 days. After this window, the War Powers Act calls for the president to terminate the military engagement if Congress has not authorized it. 

The commission is calling on Congress to repeal the 1973 War Powers Act -- key parts of which many scholars consider unconstitutional -- and to replace it with a new statute providing that the president shall consult with Congress before deploying U.S. troops into combat operations lasting, or expected to last, more than a week.  Congress would then have 30 days to approve or decline to approve military action -- and declining a vote of approval would order the military action be ended. 

The War Powers Consultation Act of 2009 would create a 20-member Joint Congressional Consultation Committee which would include leaders of the House and Senate from both parties as well as the chair and ranking members of key House and Senate committees covering foreign affairs, armed services, intelligence, and appropriations.

"The way for the president to get independent advice is to go to the Congress," said former Rep. Lee Hamilton, D-Ind., a member of the commission.

Baker said the commission has been in contact with key congressional leaders as well as both the McCain and Obama campaigns.

Asked how the commission's proposal was received by the White House hopefuls, Baker told reporters, "We haven't gotten a negative reaction. We'll wait to see what they say when you ask them about it."

Randy Scheunemann, McCain's director of foreign policy and national security, called the proposal "an interesting approach" without saying whether McCain would support it.

"Discussions about the extent of Presidential constitutional powers are as old as the republic itself, as the debates between James Madison and Alexander Hamilton illustrated," said Scheunemann. "Senator McCain has long held that any President should work cooperatively with Congress as much as possible.  This is particularly important when it comes to the most difficult question facing a country:  sending its men and women into harm's way."

"The Baker Christopher war powers proposal is an interesting approach to this enduring issue," added Scheunemann. "As President, Senator McCain would make consultations with Congress a priority, especially in the issues of war and peace."

Nick Shapiro, a spokesman for Barack Obama, was similarly complimentary and non-commital about the commission's proposal.

"Senator Obama commends this bipartisan study for advocating that the President consult Congress more closely on issues of critical national importance like the use of military force," said Shapiro.

In addition to Baker and Christopher, the commission members include former Sen. Slade Gorton (R-WA), former Rep. Lee Hamilton (D-IN), Reagan's Housing and Urban Development Secretary Carla Hills, former Rep. and Reagan's Secretary of the Army John Marsh (D-VA), Reagan's Attorney General Edwin Meese, former Rep. and judge Abner Mikva (D-IL), former Navy Admiral J. Paul Reason, Ford National Security Adviser Brent Sowcroft, Princeton University Professor Anne-Marie Slaughter, and Clinton Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott. 

July 8, 2008 in Tancredo, Tom, Thompson, Fred, Veepstakes | Permalink | User Comments (25)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Didn't state that China was in the G-8 but they play in the international order. And McCain want to reorder the G8 to exclude both China and kick out Russia. You know times have changed for Russia since 1997. They are much stronger in now, or so McCain's advisers say and that is why Russia must be confronted.

Bad case of neoconitis I think. China is the creditor that is paying for the Thus the bizarre reference.war in Iraq. Our children get the bill btw.

And who has gotta problem with sending a cruise missile into UBL's cave once we get actionable intellegence other than McCain and Hillary that is?

Anyway I call TimeZone and checking out.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | Jul 8, 2008 10:26:29 PM

Okay, peace. Please do read the Orwell essay-he would approve of none of the above phrases and words you cited with regard to politics. It changed my life, I bet it will yours too. I too disapprove of "Homeland" and the like. Sorry to break your stereotype.

Posted by: Wade | Jul 8, 2008 11:26:07 PM

What happens if the President (all
of a sudden- which is possible,
looses his judgment by some medical condition).
Can we have the President evaluated,
weighed against his decision.
How about explaining his reasons to
the respected members of the Senate or
or House or Some commision (Could be
some retired , not in politics,
politician and living ex-presidents.
We dont want A 21 st Century Nero.
World can not afford another Crazy
Man, sitting next to Nukes.
Presidents are also humans.
If they have to discuss where the money
goes, they have to discuss this
most important issue.
President never ever should decide
a War, by himself.
At least 1000 people is needed,
Who dies, where he or she dies is something concerns everybody.
I think this change should be
brought to Public arena, People
should decide on
proposed law changes.

Posted by: Yekta Kavasoglu | Jul 9, 2008 1:09:10 AM

No more blank checks for presidents to wage wars without end. War Powers is broken and must be fixed so a debacle like Bush's War in Iraq never happens again! The Constitution must be honored and the Congress must play a critical, not a passing role, in making war to ensure it is truly a last resort.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | Jul 9, 2008 1:53:24 AM

==No more blank checks for presidents to wage wars without end. War Powers is broken and must be fixed so a debacle like Bush's War in Iraq never happens again! The Constitution must be honored and the Congress must play a critical, not a passing role, in making war to ensure it is truly a last resort. ==

Since when does the Commander in Chief have a commander in chief?

I've read the Constitution, and the only thing that addresses this says that the president is Commander in Chief. Where does it say that Congress is Commander in Chief over him?

Now, Congress may declare war, but it cannot make war. It may not and cannot issue orders, nor deploy the military, nor make battlefield decisions.

The Commander in Chief/president may make war, issue orders and deploy the military, but he has no power to declare war.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | Jul 11, 2008 8:59:32 AM

Post a comment