- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
McCain Reverses Himself on Affirmative Action
July 27, 2008 9:11 AM
ABC News' Teddy Davis and Kevin Kilbane Report: During a "This Week" interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos John McCain reversed himself on affirmative action and endorsed for the first time a proposed state ballot measure which would end race and gender-based affirmative action in his home state of Arizona.
"I support it," McCain declared when asked about the referendum. "I do not believe in quotas... I have not seen the details of some of these proposals. But I’ve always opposed quotas."
McCain has long opposed quotas but his new support for ending affirmative action programs which stop short of quotas puts him at odds not only with Democratic rival Barack Obama but also with the Arizona senator's own views in 1998.
Back then, when the legislature in McCain's home state of Arizona considered sending the voters a measure to end affirmative action, McCain spoke out against it calling it "divisive."
McCain's campaign does not dispute that the Arizona senator spoke out against the 1998 effort to end affirmative action in his home state.
When asked about the apparent change in position, a McCain spokesman was not able to distinguish the two measures.
"I do not have a firm enough grasp on the historical and relevant context of McCain's remark in 1998 to give you the pushback that this question deserves," McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds told ABC News.
McCain's critics on the left charge that he has changed his position on affirmative action in order to shore up his support among conservatives.
"This is clearly an election-year flip flop and a pander to a skeptical right-wing base," said John Kraus, spokesman for the liberal Ballot Initiative Strategy Center. "He has put politics first on this issue. There is no other way around it."
Prior to reversing his affirmative action stance during his interview with Stephanopoulos, the ballot measure's proponent urged McCain to take a position in support of the referendum.
Ward Connerly, the affirmative action foe behind the Arizona and other state measures in Nebraska and Colorado, told ABC News last month that McCain was missing an opportunity to draw a sharp contrast with Obama.
On Sunday, at a gathering of journalists of color in Chicago, Obama expressed disappointment that McCain has changed his position of affirmative action. "I think in the past he had been opposed to these kinds of Ward Connerly referenda or initiatives as divisive. And I think he's right. You know, the truth of the matter is, these are not designed to solve a big problem, but they're all too often designed to drive a wedge between people, " Obama said to a question asked from an audience of journalists.
The presumptive Democratic nominee has spoken in favor of developing income-based affirmative action programs. But he also supports maintaining race-based affirmative action programs and has come out against the proposed Arizona ballot measure ending affirmative action. He has also come out against an identical measure which has qualified for the ballot in Colorado as well as one that has been proposed in Nebraska.
McCain's critics plan to argue that his new opposition to affirmative action would not only be a setback to racial minorities but also to women.
"Many of the equal opportunity programs he now supports banning," said Kraus, "are geared towards women: like recruiting more young women to go into engineering programs or making sure women owned businesses get a fair shake with government contracts. That gender part of this is often lost in much of the debate and coverage."
The proposed Arizona ballot measure endorsed by McCain reads: "The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin, in the operation of public employment, public education or public contracting."
Here is McCain's exchange with Stephanopoulos:
STEPHANOPOULOS: "Opponents of affirmative action are trying to get a referendum on the ballot here that would do away with affirmative action. Do you support that?"
MCCAIN: "Yes, I do. I do not believe in quotas. But I have not seen the details of some of the proposals. But I've always opposed quotas."
STEPHANOPOULOS: "But the one here in Arizona you support?"
McCAIN: "I support it, yes."
ABC's Sunlen Miller contributed to this report.
July 27, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (180)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
what else is new. republicans call it correction of views, just another way to cover up his flip flops.
Posted by: gary of carroll | Jul 27, 2008 9:25:11 AM
He is now apealing to the racist wing of the republican party, otherwise known as the republican party as a whole. Wait for hispanics McSame!!!
Posted by: carl29 | Jul 27, 2008 9:43:00 AM
What else is new? Each day he reverses himself n another issue. This positions/policies are a moving target.
Posted by: mary | Jul 27, 2008 9:43:59 AM
Republicans are desperate and will do and say anything to get elected. The last eight years has proved they will say whatever they want one day and then create phony pre-texts to wage war and jack up energy prices as a distraction for their flip-flopping. By the way, who let McSame wander out alone from the old-age home anyway? Trust no one over 46!
Posted by: rasterfreeart | Jul 27, 2008 9:46:19 AM
This flip flop is entirely calculated to promote a wedge issue and spark racial tensions for political gain. I did respect this man at one point but McCain really is scum.
Posted by: Jeremy | Jul 27, 2008 9:49:02 AM
How can anyone say that ending affirmative action is "racist"? Affirmative action is, by its very nature, racist. Ending it is not racist. Typical of leftists to get all turned around and upside down.
Good for McCain. I'm starting to feel better about him.
Posted by: beth | Jul 27, 2008 9:51:47 AM
Thank goodness one of the candidates is finally smart on this issue. Affirmative action is reverse discrimination and shouldn't be allowed in this country. I highly doubt that a clause like that would get rid of recruitment programs that encourage women to go into engineering. That's something that should and in many places IS taken care of by the private sector - companies, professional associations, etc. - and that's the way it should be. Gender balance, racial balance...that's not something that the government should oversee. As far as the goverment contracts, can't you file claims on discrimination issues to begin with because it's already illegal to discriminate against women and minorities? If someone has a problem with their treatment, stand up for yourself...the government doesn't have to fight for you and hold your hand. This is one flip-flop I'm not going to argue with.
Posted by: Samantha | Jul 27, 2008 9:52:18 AM
What a shame this is. This is very divisive stuff from John McCain. Mr McCain will rather divide the country racially and gender in order to win an election. BIG SHAME ON HIM
Posted by: Rolland | Jul 27, 2008 9:57:53 AM
I have a question....
Why is Affirmative Action always associated with the blacks? It was put in place for women, the elderly, hispanics, the disabled and ANY other group that had to face a lot of crap.
But NOBODY wants to talk about that !!!!!
Posted by: Order | Jul 27, 2008 9:59:53 AM
"Reverses" aka FLIP-FLOP. I knew this was coming soon. I knew McCain was a hypocrite when he attended the 40th Anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s Assassination in Memphis TN.
In 1983, McCain voted against a motion to suspend the rules and pass a bill to designate the third Monday of every January as a federal holiday in honor of the late civil rights leader, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
McCain Consistently Voted Against The Civil Rights Act. In 1990, McCain voted against a bill designed to address employer discrimination at least 4 times. According to the Washington Post, the “Civil Rights Act of 1990 is designed to overturn several recent Supreme Court rulings that made it much more difficult for individual employees to prove discrimination.
McCain Repeatedly Voted Against Raising The Minimum Wage. In the senate, John McCain voted at least eight times against measure to increase the minimum wage.
Posted by: Dave Burns | Jul 27, 2008 10:00:39 AM
McCain changes positions faster than most people change clothes, next he'll be against keeping out troops in Iraq longer than 16 months. Oh no he'll be for keeping the troops longer than 16 months. Or was that a Coors light he asked for, not a Bud Light.
Posted by: M H | Jul 27, 2008 10:01:12 AM
For those of you saying Affirmative Action is reverse discrimination, you do realize that white women have benefited the most. Google it. You'll be surprised!
Posted by: try the truth | Jul 27, 2008 10:01:13 AM
McCain's daily reversals are mind boggling to say the least. Even if a voter is in sympathy with one of McCain's revised positions, it would have to leave that voter questioning his sincerity. McCain's track record surpasses even Romney's blatant, self-serving repositioning on issues. Sorry to say, but McCain is calculating his success on a very negative impression about the voters of this country. His switches may recruit a few more supporters, but in the end the majority of the public will reject this strategy.
Posted by: Butch Dillon | Jul 27, 2008 10:02:35 AM
beth - lots of people say that ending affirmitive action is racist. In fact, I'm saying it right now. Because it's true.
Posted by: Albert R. | Jul 27, 2008 10:05:05 AM
Bobie K - wrong. Afirmitive action is meant to correct historic racial inequalities. It is race-based, yes, but not racist. That's an important distinction that many racist demagouges like to gloss over. It's a shame that McCain's campaign has gotten so desperate that he needs to pander to racists with this latest flip flop. It makes me wonder if this once-honorable man has any principles left. Very sad.
Posted by: katerina pavlakis | Jul 27, 2008 10:07:45 AM
A position in favor of affirmative actions was perhaps appropriate 10 years ago. Today, affirmative action is no longer required. McCain may have updated his views, and I applaud him for that. Of course, the whiney liddle libs will call this "flip flopping" and clamp down on it once again in hopes of derailing the McCain Train. All I'll say about that is, "Get off the tacks...you got a big surprise comin' at you in November"
Posted by: NCPilot704 | Jul 27, 2008 10:08:00 AM
Definition of "Affirmative Action":
An attempt to prove that two wrongs DO make a right.
Posted by: Rhys | Jul 27, 2008 10:08:18 AM
McCain flipflops again. Pathetic.
Posted by: Malinche | Jul 27, 2008 10:08:44 AM
Young, white women are the biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action.
Women, NOW do you see who represenet YOUR best interests? It isn't John McSame!
Posted by: Will | Jul 27, 2008 10:10:37 AM
I am a lifelong Democrat, but I have always opposed Affirmative Action because, at its core, it is morally wrong. This referendum bans both preferential treatment AND discrimination. I used to be a knee-jerk liberal and then I grew up. Please explain with intelligent thought why one man with better qualifications should be denied a job to a man with lesser qualifications simply because the lesser man is black. THAT, is discrimination, plain and simple.
Posted by: PhillyPaul | Jul 27, 2008 10:12:19 AM
Post a comment



