- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Sen. Kerry: McCain is 'Dead Wrong'; This is 'The Challenge of Our Generation'
Email
ShareJuly 31, 2008 1:56 PM
ABC News' Molly Hunter and Alexa Ainsworth Report: Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., called for a new framework to address the "war on terror" in the form of global counter-indoctrination that will win over hearts and minds. He went on to advocate for a counterinsurgency effort that will demonstrate what is best about America and focus less on brute force.
"It is long overdue that we, who ushered in the information age, start to fight an information struggle too," Kerry said Thursday at The Center for American Progress Action Fund, the advocacy branch of the liberal think tank, The Center for American Progress.
Kerry said the 2008 election represents "the highest stakes of all," and that whoever wins the election will have to deal urgently with Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan, adding that we are in "real danger of losing Afghanistan."
Kerry cited that there is a distinct choice in his mind, between Sen. John McCain and his "mangle[d] history" and "misstate[d] facts" and Sen. Barack Obama who brings the possibility of "the greatest era of progressive legislation since Lyndon Johnson."
In an October, 2003 memo on global terrorism, Donald Rumsfeld asked, what Kerry considered to be the "crucial question in today's challenge." Rumsfeld asked if we are in fact destroying as many terrorists as the radical fundamentalists are recruiting and deploying against us?
Five years later Kerry concluded that the answer to Rumsfeld's question is still "no" and that needs to change.
Kerry cited the recent high frequency of terrorist attacks globally, and said that military action in Afghanistan and Pakistan is clearly not sufficient. He emphasized the importance of focused efforts in Afghanistan and Pakistan, blaming the current impasse in Pakistan on the Bush administration's fixation on Iraq.
Kerry, an Obama supporter also blames McCain for being fixated on Iraq and took issue with McCain's April proclamation on ABC's The View, that "Afghanistan is not in trouble because of our diversion to Iraq." Kerry characterized McCain's recent judgments as "dead wrong," and said that Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan is the "challenge of our generation."
He stressed the importance of the survival of a democratically elected Pakistani government and the inescapable interconnectedness with Afghanistan, advocating for an immediate adjustment in the way the U.S. approaches Al Qaeda battlegrounds.
Overall, Kerry believes that the strategy used to fight the "war on terror" needs to be broadened.
"Focusing on winning a war of ideas as opposed to just killing terrorists will not only enable us to defeat our enemies but will restore our ability to have a positive impact on change in other areas."
July 31, 2008 in Hunter, Duncan, Kucinich, Dennis, Tancredo, Tom, Thompson, Fred, Veepstakes | Permalink | User Comments (33)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I like a lot of what Kerry said, but disagree its the challenge of our generation.
These terrorists are dangerous, and certainly shouldn't be ignored, but we're still talking about a couple thousand guys living in and out of caves. Aren't we still a superpower?
Our bigger challenges, I think, will be transitioning toward renewable energy sources and getting a handle on our own debt.
Posted by: Paul | Jul 31, 2008 2:02:10 PM
Kerry shut up you loser. Did you do your daily stabbing of Clinton in the back yet
Posted by: Eric> | Jul 31, 2008 2:10:25 PM
Yeah, let's all listen to Loser Boy Kerry because he's so wise and wonderful. Isn't he the jerk that lost the election he had in his pocket because he was soooo smart? Isn't he, in effect, the very same lame-ass Dumocrat who delivered us the biggest bozo in American history because of his pathetic campaign bungling? Isnt' he the creep that always teams up with the Old Guard, like that over-the-hill, pompous-for-no-reason Teddy K.? Lot's of credibility there!
PUMA!
OUTSOURCE THE PRESIDENCY!
Posted by: La Chatte | Jul 31, 2008 2:11:44 PM
Kerry shut up you loser. Did you do your daily stabbing of Clinton in the back yet
Posted by: Eric> | Jul 31, 2008 2:10:25 PM
-------------------------------
Ya Kerry, I will never vote for another Dem as Long as I live, BECAUSE OF YOU!!
Posted by: HP Boston | Jul 31, 2008 2:14:31 PM
Obama and Kerry think the fighting the war on terror needs to be broadened. Does that mean they think we should invade and bomb more countries??? They only give a partial solution to any problem. The terrorist are broadening their controlled territory every day. Iraq had been in some sort of turmoil for 100 years before we invaded and there is certainly no guarantee, regardless of what we do, that it will be a stable, peaceful country. Wars and conflicts have been going on since man walked upright.
Posted by: Mary | Jul 31, 2008 2:14:34 PM
lmao John Kerry Lmao Kerry the Loser lmao did he cut hisself again shaving lmao he want another purple heart?
Posted by: Steve | Jul 31, 2008 2:22:08 PM
What Kerry doesn't understand is that terrorists don't respond to anything but brute force. You cannot negotiate with them. They don't like us and want to kill us and he wants to tell them what is great about America. They don't care! Kerry and Obama equal defeat for America.
Posted by: Kelly | Jul 31, 2008 2:22:28 PM
These terrorists are dangerous, and certainly shouldn't be ignored, but we're still talking about a couple thousand guys living in and out of caves. Aren't we still a superpower?
------------------------------------
WHY oh why are we so fix satiated on these guys?
They have no army, no navy, no air force, NO Marines!! WTF are you morons in office doing? I think you want America afraid so you can run your greed to the top and rip the people off. You are quite successful at it and quite rich, how many billion did the OIL guys make in PURE PROFIT??
Posted by: HP Boston | Jul 31, 2008 2:24:40 PM
Kerry was friends with McCain before he was against him.
Posted by: Mack | Jul 31, 2008 2:25:20 PM
Wake up, people! We're no longer "King of the Hill." We're no longer the "Leader of the Free World," we've lost our place because we lost our way. McCain, like Bush, continues to sabre rattle about Iraq while completely ignoring where the bad guys are hanging out and fomenting death to the West. You think they're "only a couple thousand bad guys?" Think again. Kerry may have bored us to death during his run for President, but the fact that he lacks charisma doesn't mean that he lacks intelligence and common sense.
Posted by: nanameow | Jul 31, 2008 2:26:04 PM
"We're no longer "King of the Hill." We're no longer the "Leader of the Free World," we've lost our place"
So who has taken our place? France?
Posted by: Mack | Jul 31, 2008 2:30:42 PM
As a recent report by the Rand Corporation (a conservative think-tank) suggests, the concept of a global 'war on terror' is missing the point and preventing real progress from being made. We absolutely need to destroy the safe havens of Al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan and the FATA areas of Pakistan. But as this localized war proceeds, we need to hunt down terror networks and individuals using old-fashioned law enforcement and intelligence tools.
In the past, most terrorist networks have been destroyed by targeting their leaders, their supporters and their finances while simultaneously combating the terrorist ideology with jobs, education, financial aid and engagement of their target audience. In my opinion, the sooner we adopt this strategy, the sooner we begin minimizing international terrorism.
Posted by: RC-Toledo | Jul 31, 2008 2:32:09 PM
Classic liberal-speak. The kind that makes me reach for the Pepto Bismol. "If we're just nicer to the terrorists, maybe they'll like us." Tell that to the people who jumped from the top windows of the World Trade Center.
Posted by: Kerri | Jul 31, 2008 2:34:01 PM
What a bunch of losers.
Kerry is sooooo soooo right on this.
Posted by: becky | Jul 31, 2008 2:34:37 PM
Kerry has to be the stupidist demo ever elected to office. Lets all get a campaign of sending christmas (whoops,excuse me for my political incorrectness) xmas cards so we can win them over by showing how we will succumb to their demands to kill us.
Posted by: gary | Jul 31, 2008 2:35:25 PM
Oh crap perpetual "war on terror" where we declare a war on your civil rights, and let our army detaine arab familes without evidence. Or "Great Society II" where we take the by power of force money, and your civil liberty and force you to comply with personal theft by government versus penalty of death or incarceration. Oh well, where is "NONE OF THE ABOVE" when we need it.
Posted by: ick! | Jul 31, 2008 2:37:02 PM
"If we're just nicer to the terrorists, maybe they'll like us." Tell that to the people who jumped from the top windows of the World Trade Center. "
They weren't politicians or soldiers, just average Americans going about their daily lives.
Posted by: Mack | Jul 31, 2008 2:39:06 PM
Nobody advocates being nicer to terrorists and Obama advocates chasing them down.
The "victory in Iraq" is the creation of an Iran friendly state.
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | Jul 31, 2008 2:48:33 PM
Kelly: "What Kerry doesn't understand is that terrorists don't respond to anything but brute force."
Kelly, Kerry isn't talking about the guys already in the caves. He's talking about others in the Muslim world who haven't been yet recruited. That's the real battle.
The actual terrorists already in the camps, etc., yes we need to deal with them. And as you said, most often that will be with brute force.
Posted by: Paul | Jul 31, 2008 2:48:48 PM
Israel is not nice to its enemies and how is that working for them?
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | Jul 31, 2008 2:49:47 PM
Post a comment
