ABC: "Let's see...Obama has enjoyed an outside-the-margin lead in every poll over the past couple days, even our own. Hmmm. How can we tell people this is really a bad thing for him?" Spin. Spin. Spin. How can you expect to be taken seriously with pieces like this?

Interesting to note that the Republicans get a record low approval rating in the White House, while the Democrat majority gets almost the same record low approval rating.

The indication is that Americans are sick and tired of business as usual from both of the two major parties.

The candidates these parties have put up for chief executive offer no real change from past practice.

Bad or worse...

What a choice...

How bad is the Obama economic plan?

Consider if you were personally liable for more debt than you could repay with current levels of income.

Would your plan include spending more than you had ever spent before while reducing your income?

That is precisely what Obama's plan entails: Increase spending and cut taxes...

Smoke and mirrors hasn't worked before, and it won't work today.

Jayhawk

Obama's plan has to do with making things better for 95% of Americans and propping up the economy based on the middle class.

McCain's plan has to do propping up the economy by protecting the wealth of the top 5%. The same 5% that has seen their tax burden grow at half the rate of the rest of the country for the past 3 or 4 decades.

That's what got us here... ignoring the substance at the will, advice and hands of corporate execs and lobbyists.

McCain is still in an orgy of those same hands voices and lobbyists.

Everything that McCain stands for militarily and economically is what got us here.

He is just so entwined with the system that has rusted and molded and become symbiotic with a wealthy protectionist base.

It will hurt to pull that system out and change is hard from that but the direction of this country has to change.

Let's do a little history check:

"In September 1992, only 27% of registered voters said they had confidence in Bill Clinton's ability to handle an international crisis, whereas 62% expressed confidence in George H.W. Bush."

Who won in 1992?

"I think is a pretty hard case to make that somehow I've been shifting substantially relative to John McCain."

Now here's what we've all been waiting for with baited breath... straight from a candidate's mouth... that compelling reason to go out and vote for him, to get all fired up and feel it in the belly.

Looks like Bush is following Obama's play book for Iraq and Afganistan. Now we're going to talk to Iran's nuclear regulator. Obama's already running this country's foreign policy.

At one poit, it was thought making ethanol from corns will make you pay less than 1 dollar a gallon of gas. 0bama was enthusiastically on board and voted for the mandate. That's good for 95% Americans, right. Maybe more.

Now, you found out that WallMart has to limit your buying a bag of rice - do you know when Reagan was pres the big sized USSR had a long line to buy bread. You also find out anything you eat from frying oil to potatos to pork (maybe you only eat chiken) to milk to popcorn - yup - shut up in price. You know the rest of the story - if not, I will explain. That's the same ending you will find out in 0bama's economy. By then when you want to CHANGE you will be closer to 6 feet under.

Now, 0bama (that's a zero) shifted his emphasis again, voting to halt the ethanol regulation. It all thos rich people's falt to make you 95% people poor - tax them.

Obama: A human chameleon!

When you have no substance, you simply criticize your opponents, accusing her or him things they never said or did. They have to defend themselves, and by the media cycle finished that round, they forgot what the original question was and a new subject will come along.

Repeat again, You win.

That's how a phony does his business to deceive you.

Let's put Obama's face on a three-dollar bill!

McCain won on cross over votes and vote splitting by Huckabee and the rest of the field. Romney was the best choice.

Now Obama was a PR Golden Boy since he stepped in the lime light.

For the Dems., there was no best choice because underneath they are all the same.
But Obama had the edge by being the least qualified politician and best looking on camera.

Both choices are ridiculous. McCain at least has some viable experience.

If you hired the world’s best CEO hunting talent firm and said “find me the most honest & qualified candidates”, both of these guys would be on the bottom of the stack.

So how did they get so far?

Follow the Money.
Who backed who?

What is happening to the Dollar,----Really:------
Ask yourself: Who profits from a weak dollar?.......
Who has profited from currency fluctuations before?..........
Say….. What are “Old George Soros” and his buddies up to these days?
Think about it.

"Unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction -- towards a better future for our children and our grandchildren."

-- Barack Obama

UglyMichelle: You need to do some fact checking on your capitol gains tax statement regarding home sales. If you live in the house for 2 years your capitol gains are exempt.

Soros had input into the McCain-Kennedy Bill too.
I wonder how deep his ties run to both candidates.

linda n carolina

Only true to a given limit!

jefferson

Do you really believe a word this guy says?