« Previous | Main | Next »

Police Use Tear Gas and 'Flash Bangs' to Disperse Protesters at RNC

Share

September 02, 2008 10:03 PM

ABC News' Katie Hinman, Lindsey Ellerson and Jennifer Parker report: Several loud booms were heard outside the Xcel Energy Center in St. Paul, Minn. at approximately 9:30pm ET, where the Republican National Convention is currently underway.

Commander Doug Holtz with the Joint Information Center in St. Paul, a coalition of secret service and law enforcement officials, told ABC News officers used "chemical munitions" -- a term he says includes tear gas -- and "distraction devices" -- also known as "flashbangs" to disperse a crowd outside the Republican convention site, that he estimated at a couple hundred.

ABC News' cameras also saw police in full riot gear deploy canisters of green smoke at the crowd, although Holtz could not confirm what those were. He says it was hard to tell how many were in the crowd because they broke up and moved into smaller groups, popping up in locations from 7th and St. Peter to 11th and Roberts.

Law enforcement officials were fully armed, wearing bullet proof vests, shields, helmets and carried batons.

Holtz refused to call the crowd protesters, saying they were "not protesting anything" but causing a disturbance, blocking streets, and some of them were trying to climb the perimeter fence. He said the police methods were effective and as of now, the crowd has dispersed.

On the scene -- Sgt. Andrew Kubista, a National guardsman, told ABC News that law enforcement used "flashbangs" -- bright lights and loud noises, to break up protesters.

"They tried to scale the wall," Kubista said of demonstrators causing commotion near the large steel barricades setup around the convention site. 

The entry to the Xcel center has currently been shutdown.  No one is being allowed in and the gates are secured all around.

September 2, 2008 in Vote 2008: Republicans | Permalink | User Comments (98)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Gotta love the militarized pollice who herd the protestors inside a cage then pepper spray, rubber bullet, and assault them for "failure to obey an order to disperse." It was a free fire zone to beat the hell out of anybody who showed up while the police provocateured the people who were left over that they couldn't spy on and raid and arrest beforehand (before they even did anything like protest, let alone anything illegal) like in the case with the group that Amy Goodman from "Democracy Now!" was with. This was a police state setup from start to finish, to intimidate anyone and everyone who dared to voice their oppostition to the incumbent party. And all at taxpayer expense. How quaint. This IS America today. How do you like it?

Posted by: argh! | Sep 2, 2008 10:16:50 PM

this is just the beginning.

once a new "president" (read: dictator) is elected, the country will collapse, then there will be "protests" all over this country.

don't forget what we were back in 1776 when we shed our first oppressive government.....

Posted by: drew | Sep 2, 2008 11:08:13 PM

democracy silenced through wasted tax dollars!

Posted by: mcbush | Sep 2, 2008 11:10:00 PM

I want to know about award winning journalist and host of "Democracy Now" Amy Goodman getting arrested by St. Paul police while covering the protest outside the RNC. I want to know about REAL news about first amendment violations and how freedom of the press is being violated. This issue deserves top line press!

Posted by: Disgusted! | Sep 2, 2008 11:13:02 PM

These are not protesters they are animals with no intent other than to cause caos. Smashing windows, destroying property and breaking and entering are not protest. GO LAW ENFORCEMENT! Jail these clowns and don't take anything from them. Slap these idiots down and jail them.

Posted by: Al | Sep 2, 2008 11:13:02 PM

......hold on a minute,

I'm watching tv and there's not a word about protests, or a lock-down.

Posted by: kevin | Sep 2, 2008 11:13:38 PM

The protestors were causing problems. They had no acceptable reason, except to cause destractions.
The police used acceptable force to correct the problem. The protester should be put into jail until after the convention, but the we the people of Minnesota will just have to pay for their meals and their confortable matress.

Posted by: ada gott | Sep 2, 2008 11:14:20 PM

Beat those dirty hippies

Posted by: hippy hater | Sep 2, 2008 11:15:03 PM

I was at a protest @ a Bush fund raiser in Portland Oregon in 2002 when the pigs pepper sprayed a baby (and yes police who pepper spray a baby are pigs). Let me repeat that, THEY PEPPER SPRAYED A BABY!!!

Posted by: DKC | Sep 2, 2008 11:15:28 PM

There are reports coming out of police snipers perched throughout a concert in the area. There are reports of police herding peaceful marchers, forcing them to the Xcel Center, where they were met by other police who told them to turn around or get tazed. They were tightly compacted and then cordoned off with yellow tape and not allowed to leave. Bystanders were caught in the roundup and not allowed to go either. The Bush presidency has expanded the police state; the spooks in the surveillance industry continually press increasingly sinister devices on a law-enforcement community only too willing to use taxpayer dollars to buy them. Command and control and tase when necessary. Beat when necessary. Film when necessary. Put non violent protest or expression of "protected" speech in a pen instead of treating those voicing their opinion, within rights granted them by the Constitution, like what they are. Americans. Wake up, America! They're not perfect, but Obama and Biden are both Constitutional scholars and they might actually respect the people's right to live under the rule of law. Make sure it happens.

Posted by: Constitution Down | Sep 2, 2008 11:15:41 PM

Oh brother. Police state? Get a grip on reality. If the people weren't blocking streets there wouldn't be a problem. If they observed the perimeter fence there wouldn't be a problem. But then that would require common sense. It's a shame my tax money was required to disperse the idiots.

Posted by: Say What? | Sep 2, 2008 11:16:08 PM

I wish they would show more scenes of hippies getting beat down

Posted by: hippy hater | Sep 2, 2008 11:16:56 PM

Hey Drew---You dumb @#@...Quit smoking that Dope. These people are nothing more than punks and deserve whatever law enforcement gives them. These punks remind me of a two year throwing a temper tantrum. You become an adult by expressing yourself in an intelligent and meaning full manner not by becoming ignorant and juvenile. Grow up people!

Posted by: Frank | Sep 2, 2008 11:17:43 PM

Why does my hard earned money have to pay for jobless hippies to go to jail for being stupid?

Posted by: hippy hater | Sep 2, 2008 11:17:51 PM

I think the people who were arrested and won't give their identity should have their pictures placed on the news for others to identify. They should sit in jail until they get processed.

Posted by: Gail | Sep 2, 2008 11:19:39 PM

At least they might give them a shower

Posted by: hippy hater | Sep 2, 2008 11:19:44 PM

Or maybe at least a stick of deodorant and a razor

Posted by: hippy hater | Sep 2, 2008 11:20:24 PM

There was so much in the news about how China kept protesters from activating during the Olympics. Where is the mainstream media coverage about OUR government and their anti-protest tactics. Visit Democracy Now! That website had reports on unconstitutional arrests (prior to the conventions) of people who planned to protest in St Paul. IS THIS STILL AMERICA, LAND OF THE FREE? There are elements in our government who seek to keep us from our constitutional right to free speech. Apathy is suicide. Speak up, act now...before it is too late!

Posted by: peacefulinthesouth | Sep 2, 2008 11:20:28 PM

True or false: Protesters damaged police cars.
True or false: Protesters blocked traffic.
True or false: Protesters staged sit-ins in the middle of traffic.
True or false: Protesters attempted to riot.

I believe the majority of demonstrators there were doing what they think were right. The few numskulls there causing trouble tend to ruin it for a lot of America loving patriots.

I am, however, for the use of force against those willing to riot or damage property. Yet, let the peaceful demonstrations continue in peace.

Posted by: Yargh. | Sep 2, 2008 11:20:32 PM

"Voice their opposition to the incumbent party"? Converging en masse, crossing barricades, climbing walls, and displaying characteristics of a mob is not part of a person's freedom of speech. There are many other avenues for (peacefully) voicing one's difference of opinion. It the intersection sign says "Don't Go" and you go anyway and get hit. That's on you. Unfortunately, the liberal mentality is to get a lawyer and sue which only entices these wackos to tempt the law and endanger the lives of others like it's a form of entertainment.

Posted by: Emm | Sep 2, 2008 11:21:39 PM

Post a comment