- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
'What's Next, Starbucks?' GOP Lawmakers Angry with Bailouts
September 18, 2008 2:33 PM
ABC News' Dean Norland reports: Conservative House Republicans want the U.S. Treasury secretary and the Federal Reserve Board chairman to stop the bailouts.
"Our heads are spinning now with the bailout mania," Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., told reporters at a news conference Thursday.
"First, we were told that Bear Stearns was too big to fail, then we were told that Freddie/Fannie were too big to fail, then we were told that AIG was too big to fail. What’s next, Starbucks too big to fail,” she pondered.
House GOP conservatives are sending letters to Secretary Henry Paulson and Chairman Ben Bernanke, demanding no more bailouts for failing businesses and financial institutions.
"The bailout we are interested in is bailing out the American taxpayer,” said Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, chairman of the conservative Republican Study Group.
According to the group, the solution to the financial meltdown is to lower capital gains and corporate tax rates to get money off the sidelines and into the economy
Later, at another news conference, Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, the House Republican leader, complained about the administration’s lack of information sharing and consultation with Congress.
"I've gotten a phone call from time to time about what’s coming a few minutes before everyone else did," Boehner said. "But in terms of the kind of information that members are looking for, it just hasn't been there."
To underscore his point, Boehner said a meeting of the House Republican Conference, a group of all House GOP members, had to be cancelled Thursday morning because the White House refused to send anyone to brief the group.
A source later indicated the conference had asked for representatives from Treasury and the Fed to address the group.
Boehner also said the situation at AIG raises concerns. "When you’re putting taxpayer funds at risk, I think it is a very serious and sobering moment,” he said.
He said that history will tell whether the AIG decision was the right one.
September 18, 2008 in Vote 2008: Republicans, Washington, White House | Permalink | User Comments (55)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
and btw,one of your quotes was almost 6 years old... that the best you can come up with??
Posted by: bah | Sep 18, 2008 3:26:03 PM
There is one bailout that would solve all of these problems - providing fixed-rate, 30-year mortgages to people who are facing foreclosure.
This would stabilize home prices and stabilize the markets.
But it would also be seen as socialist whereas bailing out AIG overnight is not.
Posted by: cincyr | Sep 18, 2008 3:27:55 PM
Donald Trump endorsed mccain last night. If there was ever a guy that looks out for his own interest it's Trump so that's good enough reason for me not to vote for mccain. I guess Trump would fall in that group making over $250,000 so he's worried. Anyone making under $250,000/year will see a tax decrease under Obama. Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | Sep 18, 2008 3:28:32 PM
Yes and you can thank this Senator:
In 2002, McCain introduced a bill to deregulate the broadband Internet market, warning that "the potential for government interference with market forces is not limited to federal regulation." Three years earlier, McCain had joined with other Republicans to push through landmark legislation sponsored by then-Sen. Phil Gramm (Tex.), who is now an economic adviser to his campaign. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act aimed to make the country's financial institutions competitive by removing the Depression-era walls between banking, investment and insurance companies. (WashPO)
Posted by: Paige | Sep 18, 2008 3:29:09 PM
Barb previously wrote: "Seriously, these Republicans got us into this mess....Where was the President and his administration?"
While you no doubt get emotional satisfaction from your rant, at some point you will HAVE to address these cold hard facts:
1. CONGRESS is the branch of government charged with regulating banks and quasi public companies such as 'Fannie' and 'Freddie'
2. CONGRESS writes the laws and regulations creating these entities and (supposedly) for "regulating" them.
3. Unfortunately, Congress has drafted these laws in such a fashion so as to almost GUARANTEE fraud and abuse will be rampant, and failure inevitable. For example, how is it POSSIBLE to allow somebody to apply for a mortgage without having to disclose how much money they make? Under those circumstances, how on earth can Fannie Mae decide if the applicant is a good risk or not (i.e. more likely to pay than default?) FANIE MAE DIDN'T CARE IF THE BORROWER COULD PAY OR NOT - SINCE Fannie KNEW the government was committed to bail them out if everything went south.
4. Re-read items 1-3 above. Are you STILL SURPRISED everything went into the tank??????????
Posted by: alwyr | Sep 18, 2008 3:32:49 PM
Not surprising that the do-nothing party wants to do nothing is it? They would rather demagogue.
Posted by: indy_voter | Sep 18, 2008 3:34:02 PM
so whats you point daverino? the congress has been (and still is by virtue of the lame duck veto) under republican majority rule for the last 8 years ,and many before that as well.
yeah its a problem that the republicans have failed to address ,mainly because they were GETTING RICH BECAUSE OF IT !!!
THEY ARE THE MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS YOU ARE BAILING OUT DAILY AND THEY ARE DECIDING YOU USE TAXPAYER DOLLARS TO PAD THEIR ALREADY GIGANTIC SECRET SWISS BANK ACCOUNTS.
go on , be stupid . elect another republican ,its nothing to me really.
gives me something to live for though ,cause i live for the day when the american voter has an iq score > a light bulb/room temperature...evidently though ,reading over these posts its apparent that hasnt happened quite yet..
Posted by: bah | Sep 18, 2008 3:34:36 PM
McCain, a member of Congress, has long been a champion of less government regulation. In 1995, he supported an unsuccessful attempt to create a moratorium on all kinds of federal regulation. He maintained that excessive regulations were "destroying the American family, the American dream." He said voters "want these regulations stopped."
"I'm always for less regulation but I am aware of the view that there is a need for government oversight," he told the Wall Street Journal last March. He added, "but I am fundamentally a deregulator."
Posted by: Paige | Sep 18, 2008 3:35:05 PM
Who is the Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee? Who got the most Fannie/Freddie donations?
Answer to both: Dem Sen Chris Dodd.
Who proposed Fannie/Freddie reform back in 2005 (probably too little too late, but worth a try)? Sen. John McCain.
Which candidate understand the financial complexities of the current situation - neither.
Posted by: Holdfast | Sep 18, 2008 3:38:53 PM
Why is it that Republicans have nothing else to resort to in this situation but name calling and grasping for things that are largely irrelevant?
And Good Lt, you ought to be careful saying things like 'the truth hurts'. Someone is liable to point right back at you and say, yes, it does.
Posted by: Sarah B | Sep 18, 2008 3:39:55 PM
alwyr,
Remind me...what party was in charge of Congress 18 of the last 20 years? And what party held the presidency for the last 8 with veto power over any legislation proposed by Congress? And what party has as their centepiece de-requlation of business? Republicans do not want to take responsibility for any of the mess that they have created...and it is not just the economy..
Posted by: indy_voter | Sep 18, 2008 3:44:55 PM
Holdfast - Who has three Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae uber lobbyist working and advising in the inner circle of his campaign? JOHN MCCAIN.
How is he going to serve two masters?
Posted by: Paige | Sep 18, 2008 3:46:14 PM
We should be paying attention here, paying attention because thats all we may have to pay with. We should as citizens all demand that an outside agency, not one appointed by any member of Congress ,investigate this matter.
Hire an outside firm, outside the country if necessary ,lay the books out and go to it. All we have seen so far is a finger pointed and recess by our leaders called. Is this what we pay them for? Or do most of them have something to hide?
Posted by: david | Sep 18, 2008 3:50:57 PM
My god, I have never heard so much whining in my life! Oh wait, this is all coming from the left mainly. We are tired of hearing you complain about the government's inability to help you, that's what happens when you put your faith and dependence in the government. For once, can you spare us your entitlement garbage and stop your incessant pan handling for taxpayer money. Go out there and get it done, work for it! You bring shame to our parents and grandparents who built this country and faced much more daunting challenges than this!
Posted by: Lobo | Sep 18, 2008 3:52:06 PM
i would much rather be known as the "do nothing" party than be known as the " confederate flag-waving, gun toting redneck, white cloak/hood wearing cross burning, orphanage mortgage foreclosing ,war starting ,lying ,cheating ,elitist,racist party."
but you like it eh? that says volumes about you ,and is why i never have yet met a hard line republican i would knowingly sit down at the same table with for a meal.
by and large republicans are sanctimonious , pretentious,fat,richer than anyone needs to be,conniving ,users, manipulators. most never worked a day ,not real work anyway. they either ripped some one else off to get(eg; silverado savings and loan /j mccain or fatcat investor bailout @ taxpayer ewxpnse) their money ,or inherited most of it ,and use that to "work" and get richer.
laff @ "Work" = oxymoron to a republican
totally disgusting and repugnant and all of that PLUS absolutely no clue what noblesse oblige means...
sub-humans.
Posted by: bah | Sep 18, 2008 3:54:21 PM
Bachmann could be the least intelligent member of Congress, and that's saying quite a lot, given the competition for that title.
Posted by: Dave J. | Sep 18, 2008 4:04:12 PM
Michele Bachmann, is an idiot; can I say that? AIG was a Bailin. Bachman's stupid point confirms that the Republicans know NOTHING about the economy. How about this: years of a Republican controlled executive branch, congress, and with the efforts of corporate lobbying, repealed a number of regulatory safeguards that kept banks and investment firms from creating opaque financial vehicles. The lack of transparency in this firms has led to a death spiral of asset valuation, as no company is clear how to mark their assets (good or bad) to the market. In short, sometimes regulation of market pushes the market, with an invisible hand, towards stability and efficiency.
Posted by: Mark | Sep 18, 2008 4:18:34 PM
"The bailout we are interested in is bailing out the American taxpayer,” said Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Tex., chairman of the conservative Republican Study Group.
the article continues "...According to the group, the solution to the financial meltdown is to lower capital gains and corporate tax rates to get money off the sidelines and into the economy"
yeah and the solution to having a headache is cutting off your head...
the above shows clearly WHAT A BUNCH OF RIP OFF CON-ARTIST PUBLIC MANIPULATORS REPUBLICANS ARE , THEY CAN LIE BETTER THAN A SONGBIRD CAN SING..EFFORTLESSLY
Posted by: bah | Sep 18, 2008 4:36:38 PM
"The bailout we are interested in is bailing out the American taxpayer,” said Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Tex., chairman of the conservative Republican Study Group.
note: the above is written in republican-speak , a very esoteric language indeed...for a clearer understanding kindly substitute "fleecing" for "bailing" and "bailing out" in the above paragraph to get the true meaning.
Posted by: bah | Sep 18, 2008 4:44:59 PM
The establishment is screwing the taxpayers and the lower level management (local govt., house) to take care of their banker buddies so they can retire with their pensions and a cushy lobbyist job when/if they ever get voted out. They don't work for you or care about you. Haven't you realized that yet!
Posted by: hmn | Sep 18, 2008 4:50:53 PM
Post a comment



