« Previous | Main | Next »

McCain Steps Up Insinuation Ifill Is Biased

Share

October 02, 2008 10:50 AM

ABC News' Bret Hovell, Teddy Davis, Ferdous Al-Faruque Report: While appearing Thursday morning on "Fox and Friends," John McCain criticized the selection of PBS' Gwen Ifill as moderator of the vice presidential debate because she is writing a book called "The Breakthrough: Politics and Race In The Age of Obama."

"Frankly, I wish they had picked a moderator that isn't writing a book that is favorable to Barack Obama -- I mean let's face it," said McCain. "But I have to have confidence that Gwen Ifill will treat this as the professional journalist that she is."

"Frankly, I would imagine that there are other people out there who are not writing a book on Inauguration Day favorable to Sen. Obama," said McCain.

"But that's life," he continued. "Life isn't fair as I said earlier on the program. And whoever the moderator is and no matter what the questions are, it doesn't matter because Sarah Palin is great."

McCain began raising questions about Ifill on Wednesday after the DrudgeReport linked to a story on WorldNetDaily.com questioning whether Ifill's book would be pro-Obama. The Arizona senator said Wednesday that he did not previously know about Ifill's book even though it had previously been reported.

While McCain began sowing doubts about Ifill during a Wednesday interview with Fox's Carl Cameron, he did not directly question her selection as moderator until his Thursday interview with "Fox and Friends."

When the McCain campaign began insinuating bias on the part of Ifill on Wednesday, Biden spokesman David Wade reacted by describing it to ABC News' Matt Jaffe as an effort to "work the refs".

Ifill herself weighed in Wednesday in an interview with the Associated Press.

Ifill's book is about a new generation of black leaders, and she told the AP that she has not yet written the chapter on Obama.

She wondered why anyone would assume the book will be favorable to Obama.

"Do you think they made the same assumptions about Lou Cannon when he wrote his book about Reagan?" asked Ifill, host of PBS' "Washington Week" and senior correspondent on "The NewsHour."

Asked by AP's David Bauder if she thought there were racial motives at play, Ifill said, "I don't know what it is. I find it curious."

Ifill told the AP that she did not tell the Commission on Presidential Debates about the book.

October 2, 2008 in Biden, Joe, McCain, John, Obama, Barack, Palin, Sarah, Vote 2008: Democrats, Vote 2008: Republicans | Permalink | User Comments (256)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"And whoever the moderator is and no matter what the questions are, it doesn't matter because Sarah Palin is great."

Then why is McCain bringing it up in the first place? He sounds like an underperforming basketball player arguing calls with the refs. How about shutting up and playing ball?

Posted by: fivecard | Oct 2, 2008 10:57:35 AM

Apparently, it has been known since July that Gwen Ifill had written this book. Obviously McCain is very scared and desperate. He's hoping to intimidate Ifill into throwing lollipop questions to Palin who he knows is severely vulnerable due to her lack of experience and knowledge.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | Oct 2, 2008 11:00:23 AM

oh please. McCain camp = whiners/losers

Posted by: dem in chicago | Oct 2, 2008 11:01:19 AM

Another day .. another reference to race! Ha ha! It's comical anymore - just comical!

Posted by: Marcus | Oct 2, 2008 11:02:16 AM

These constant complaints about unfair press just demonstrates McCain/Palin are unfit for the White House. If you can not talk to our press without complaint, how are you going to talk with our allies who will ask tough questions and may "not be fair". What is McCain going to say? "Sorry, PM Brown, we can not make it to the G8 Summit. Some of you are just unfair to us."

Posted by: Paige | Oct 2, 2008 11:03:34 AM

More dirty tricks from the Republicans, surprise! This book was announced in July before the McCain camp approved Ifill. We'll be able to tell if the questions are biased. We'll also be able to tell whether or not Palin and Biden can answer questions. Foreign policy questions are not out of bounds simply because Biden has the experience and Palin does not.

Posted by: Ready OR NOT | Oct 2, 2008 11:03:58 AM

This is a psychological tactic to intimidate Ifill before the debate, and also to take the attention away from Palin's ineptitude and put it on the "liberal media" bias. It won't work because Ifill has been known to be probing and critical of anyone she's interviewing, no matter what party they belong to. She'll ask tough questions of both Biden and Palin.

Posted by: Laura Brown | Oct 2, 2008 11:04:40 AM

And it doesn't matter who the moderator is. Unless he/she is obviously conservative, it just won't do, will it? Desperate times, desperate measures...

Posted by: counting crows | Oct 2, 2008 11:04:52 AM

Of course McShame is going to question the moderator's bias. He has to do anything he can to stop the debate, or question it, because Palin is such a bimbo and he picked her. "ITS ALL THEY'RE FAULT!" And to think, there was a time when people used to respect McShame.

Posted by: algwriter | Oct 2, 2008 11:05:38 AM

Ifill really should step down , because for some reason she will be BLAME by the Mccain camp if things dont go the way they want.
last thing you want is to give them excuses.
btw .. i just find her book deal a little weird on the release date, she is better off getting it out now. I know Its a free country and anyone can write a book.

Posted by: winston | Oct 2, 2008 11:05:41 AM

Ifill has been working on this book for many months. It has been public knowledge the subject matter, anticipated release date, etc. If the McCain camp is upset, they can point the finger at their own incompetence for not knowing this when they accepted the debate in the first place.

Posted by: Get Over It | Oct 2, 2008 11:06:22 AM

I THINK THEY SHOULD HAVE AN INDEPENDENT MODERATOR. IT WOULD BE JUST AS BAD IF THEY HAD SOMEONE SUPPORTING MCCAIN DOING THE MODERATING!!! WHAT HAS HAPPENEND TO OUR MEDIA. IT SEEMS TO BE SOOO BIASED. THEY SHOULD MOVE IN WITH OBAMA!!! OOPS THEY ALREADY HAVE!!

Posted by: ELAINE | Oct 2, 2008 11:06:30 AM

I THINK THEY SHOULD HAVE AN INDEPENDENT MODERATOR. IT WOULD BE JUST AS BAD IF THEY HAD SOMEONE SUPPORTING MCCAIN DOING THE MODERATING!!! WHAT HAS HAPPENEND TO OUR MEDIA. IT SEEMS TO BE SOOO BIASED. THEY SHOULD MOVE IN WITH OBAMA!!! OOPS THEY ALREADY HAVE!!

Posted by: ELAINE | Oct 2, 2008 11:07:12 AM

I wonder HOW Sen. McCain knows that her book is "favorable to Sen. Obama"? According to the actual author - she hasn't even written the chapter on Obama yet!! One more example of his efforts to manipulate the truth.

Posted by: shelleyt | Oct 2, 2008 11:10:35 AM

A debate is a bit like a test. You prepare as much as you can and hope that you study the right stuff. The difference here is that one candidate has an advantage because of his experience. Perhaps they should change all of the questions to Alaska policy, so that Palin has a chance to shine.

You can substitute some experience with intellect. But an overall comprehension of the subject is still required. Obama is perceived to have won the foreign policy debate with McCain, despite McCain's experience credentials.

These last minute shenanigans by the Republicans won't be an explanation if Palin struggles. Either you know it or you don't. If all the questions are about Troopergate and her pregnant daughter, then maybe they'll have a point.

Til then it's time to see what gaps the VP candidates have...

Posted by: No Excuses | Oct 2, 2008 11:11:01 AM

Correct me if I am wrong but isn't Tom Brokaw moderating McCain's next debate? Brokaw obviously favors McCain. Fat chance McCain will object to Brokaw who has been anything but neutral the last few weeks.

Posted by: Jackson in NC | Oct 2, 2008 11:12:21 AM

Based on these requirements, Oscar the Grouch from Sesame Street could not even moderate this debate. Oscar has a book, WHICH WITCH IS WHICH?, and since Palin had the Kenyan witch doctor pray over her to protect her from witches - this would clearly be a conflict of Interest.

Posted by: Get Real | Oct 2, 2008 11:13:10 AM


First the republicans complained about how unfair Palin's interview were, now they are preparing for another excuse when Palin bombs tonight by setting the stage with Gwen Ifill. Ifill is a professional, she has been in the business for years, and she knows how to separate opinion from facts. Just because someone writes about an individual doesn't mean he or she takes his or her side. It is also nonsense that Ifill will use the debate to sell more copies of her book. She certainly hasn’t done this in the past. If the republicans want to complain about biased news, they should first talk about FOX NEWS. However, most important, the republicans are only making a big deal of this so they can fall back on it if Palin bombs. This tells us how little faith they really have with her.

Posted by: The Unshrub | Oct 2, 2008 11:13:51 AM

John McCain recognized the corruption in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac years ago. He supported legislation to address the corruption in these institutions. Democrats in Congress stopped it. They said there was no corruption. Obama didn’t open his mouth on the subject The Obama-media is ignoring this little fact. Please spread the word among your family and friends, and ask them to do the same. The Obama-media will never tell Americans the truth. If the legislation to corral Fannie and Freddie had succeeded, we would not be spending $700Billion to bail out Wall Street. McCain made the right call in 2005; Obama was silent.

Posted by: Ex Democrat | Oct 2, 2008 11:13:59 AM

What I hear is a presidential nominee who has become unsure of his vp pick. The rest is noise.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | Oct 2, 2008 11:14:02 AM

Post a comment