« Previous | Main | Next »

Palin Differs With McCain on Federal Marriage Amendment

Share

October 20, 2008 9:14 AM

ABC News' Imtiyaz Delawala Reports: Republican vice presidential nominee Gov. Sarah Palin has signaled support for a federal marriage amendment defining marriage as between a man and woman – a position inconsistent with Sen. John McCain, who has opposed such a measure, as well as with her own previously stated position of letting states decide on such issues.

In an interview to air tomorrow on The 700 Club, Christian Broadcasting News senior correspondent David Brody asked Palin, "On constitutional marriage amendment, are, are you for something like that?"

"I am, in my own, state, I have voted along with the vast majority of Alaskans who had the opportunity to vote to amend our Constitution defining marriage as between one man and one woman," Palin said, citing the 1998 initiative that banned gay marriage in her home state.

"I wish on a federal level that that's where we would go because I don't support gay marriage," Palin added, taking a position at odds with McCain, who voted against efforts for a proposed Federal Marriage Amendment in 2004 and 2006. Earlier this month, McCain told the Washington Blade, a gay newspaper, that he continues to oppose such an amendment today because he thinks the definition of marriage should be a state matter and not one for the federal government "as long as no state is forced to adopt some other state's standard."

While Palin's position differs from McCain's, it is also seemingly at odds with statements she has made calling herself a "federalist" who supports letting individual states decide on such matters.

When asked last month by CBS' Katie Couric why she considered Roe v. Wade a bad decision, Palin said she believed states and not the federal government should decide the legality of the issue.

"I think it should be a states' issue not a federal government-mandated, mandating yes or no on such an important issue. I'm, in that sense, a federalist, where I believe that states should have more say in the laws of their lands and individual areas," Palin said. "And I believe that individual states can best handle what the people within the different constituencies in the 50 states would like to see their will ushered in an issue like that."

McCain, who often calls himself a "federalist," has tied together his opposition to Roe v. Wade as well as a Federal Marriage Amendment as consistent with the position of letting states make such decisions.

"I'm a federalist. Just as I believe that the issue of gay marriage should be decided by the states, so do I believe that we would be better off by having Roe v. Wade return to the states," McCain said in an interview on This Week with George Stephanopoulos in November 2006. "And I don't believe the Supreme Court should be legislating in the way that they did on Roe v. Wade."

As she has said in previous interviews, Palin told CBN’s Brody that she would not "judge" gay individuals, but said that she will continue "casting my votes and speaking up for traditional marriage."

"I'm not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can't do, should and should not do," Palin told Brody. "But I certainly can express my own opinion here and take actions that I believe would be best for traditional marriage, and that's casting my votes and speaking up for traditional marriage that, that instrument that it's the foundation of our society is that strong family and that's based on that traditional definition of marriage, so I do support that."

October 20, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (424)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Over the past two weeks my church has made an issue of "gay marriage" in the "pulpit" and I suppose she is trying to tap into that.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | Oct 20, 2008 10:13:14 AM

As a feminist, I thought Sarah Palin might become a role model for other women to get involved with politics. However, after watching numerous Sarah Palin videos, I'm enranged with her policies. Palin is against women's rights, and she does not have anything to offer for the United States. Please check out this site:

http://dailysource.org/palinvideos

This site has videos of her talking about foreign policy and also lots of other topics including the economy, energy, the environment, and the media. It's got every interview andd nationally televised speech since she was picked, as well as every SNL skit and Daily Show report about her.

Posted by: annonymous | Oct 20, 2008 10:13:59 AM

Yes, I too bemoan the lack of education and critical thinking in the US, as evidenced by most posters here. Anyone who thinks about this realizes that MARRIAGE has to be handled FEDERALLY, because people move from state to state. Or, do you propose that a state that overwhelmingly opposes gay marriage will have to recognize a marriage when a couple moves there from Massachusetts?

A Federal law is REQUIRED when state-to-state reciprocity is required. Or, perhaps this is the intent of the leftists: Get at handful of states to enact Gay Marriage, then force it on the rest of the states through existing reciprocity law.

Posted by: Tom | Oct 20, 2008 10:15:51 AM

The Republicans always need a boogie man to scare their lemmings. Gay marriage is it. Hilarious! And it's hardly a religious issue because cheery-picking Bible verses (without even knowing the Aramaic or Hebrew translations) is only for the most ignorant. If you want to follow the Bible, follow the Bible: marriage is about women being property. Read the book. Otherwise, it's all about fear (a tactic that works only on the ignorant and the frightened Republican evangelicals who seem to know nothing about Jesus Christ, who he was and what he did here in Earth.) Maybe they should start doing something about feeding the poor, taking care of injustice, and equality...but that would mean they'd actually have to do something other than complain and hate.

Posted by: baker | Oct 20, 2008 10:16:08 AM

Palin's comments make perfect sense to me. I don't expect every politician to agree with every other politician on every issue, and McCain DOES have the problem of being a bit wishy-washy about issues regarding life and marriage. So does the rest of the Republican Party.

I'm glad to see a prominent politician defend a Culture of Life for change!

Posted by: John | Oct 20, 2008 10:21:05 AM

What this says is that Sarah Palin has something that is lacking in the rest of the politicans, backbone.

This isn't a bad thing.

Posted by: Leader with a spine! | Oct 20, 2008 10:24:49 AM

The absoulute LAST thing the McCain/Palin camp needs is

MORE CONFUSION.

We went from

strong economy fundamentals

to socialism

in three weeks.

in between was

crisis
firing folks
the fannie freddie scandal
acorns
ayers
joe the plummer

Posted by: Omentum | Oct 20, 2008 10:25:15 AM

Howard Gallas...something is really "off" if you encourage readers to go to factcheck.org to confirm your claims, and when doing so, find that your claims are erroneous. Perhaps your racist mindset is beginning to interfere with the synapses in your brain. Good luck to you pal. Maybe someday you will learn that what you are trying to hold onto isn't really worth it...

Posted by: PALIN WATCH | Oct 20, 2008 10:28:13 AM

So, if the issue were slavery, she would be just fine with letting the sourthern states decide for themselves.

Isn't that precious.

Posted by: Thomas Mc | Oct 20, 2008 10:28:52 AM

the main thing that this shows is that she has no overall philosophy or legal understanding of government. She contradicted her "federalist" statement because she really doesn't know what it means. Her behavior in Troopergate and statements about legal issues shows that she deals with issues on a personal, emotional and visceral level, not on a thoughtful or analytical one. Bottom line, she doesn't know the law, doesn't know government, doesn't know the world, and doesn't seem to care about her ignorance. That McCain would put her a heartbeat away from the presidency is the final indictment of his fitness to be president himself.

Posted by: Scott | Oct 20, 2008 10:30:23 AM

Yes we did, Omentum.

All the while the democrats have had complete control of congress.

How much money did Obama get from Fannie and Freddie again?

In the last two years, what did the price of gas do? How about the economy?

Bush doesn't make the laws nor did he cause any of this. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid did this all by themselves.

What is the approval rating of the democrat controlled congress? Lower than Bush's, that's what I thought.

Posted by: Place the blame where it belongs | Oct 20, 2008 10:33:56 AM

You have to wonder if she even understands that she contradicted herself.

Posted by: Paul | Oct 20, 2008 10:35:50 AM

b - Obviously you are way out of your depth here. Simple-minded people = simple-minded ideas.

Posted by: counting crows | Oct 20, 2008 10:37:52 AM

Why do all these 'Reagan federalists' who believe so strongly in a state's ability to make its own decisions also refuse to acknowledge any state that votes for medical marijuana rights?

Posted by: Paul | Oct 20, 2008 10:38:24 AM

Palin walked away from McCain a long time ago.

Posted by: newz4i | Oct 20, 2008 10:41:06 AM

Palin strikes me as just another Republican who wants states to make their own choices, independent of the federal government, and in accordance with her views.

Posted by: Paul | Oct 20, 2008 10:41:28 AM

why not legal partnership instead of marriage?

Posted by: kawasaki | Oct 20, 2008 10:45:33 AM

Biden differs with Obama on the fact that Obama is not qualified or experienced to be president.

Posted by: Beck | Oct 20, 2008 10:46:18 AM

Once again Palin has proven herself to go against the "standard". I applaud her for that!!!

Posted by: Jill | Oct 20, 2008 10:51:50 AM

You have got to stop reading Liberal propaganda web sites. Todd Palin belong BRIEFLY TO THE GROUP YOU MENTIONED AS MANY INDIGENOUS TRIBE PEOPLE FROM ALASKA DO. Its sort of like the American Plain Indians having their own reservations. It represented tribal pride. He was a member for a little over a year until he decided the group was too politically extreme and he quit. His wife, Gov. Palin NEVER BELONG TO THE GROUP, and if she attended a meeting to see what is was about isn't that what you should do?


** It was a separatist group and he was in it longer than a year. So maybe you should start checking your facts. Furthermore, I wish they would (sarah and todd) move to Russia because no one but these starved Republicans like her. No person with a brain likes her. She doesn't know anything and if anything the liberal media has given her a pass. What about her abuse of power? her pregnant daughter? There are A LOT OF THINGS THAT CONCERN PEOPLE ABOUT SARAH PALIN AND HER OWN PARTY IS CALLING HER OUT SO WHY SHOULDN'T THE DEMOCRATS? ACTUALLY REPUBLICANS HAVE RIPPED HER WORST THAN OBAMA AND BIDEN BECAUSE THEY ARE SPEAKING FOR ALL THE PEOPLE NOT 5% OF THE PEOPLE

Posted by: RepubsareSLOW | Oct 20, 2008 10:53:33 AM

Post a comment