- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Only Halfway Through the Foreclosure Crisis?
November 13, 2008 4:21 PM
ABC News' Z. Byron Wolf Reports from Capitol Hill: Martin Eakes, who runs the Center for Responsible Lending, told the Senate Banking Committee in February 2007 that the U.S. was on the precipice of two million foreclosures for subprime loans. Today, the committee chairman, Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., called Eakes prescient and said the two million figure "seems almost quaint."
Eakes, however, sees no end to the foreclosure crisis in sight.
"We're only halfway through subprime loans alone, not to mention a third of the way or less through the adjustable or arm," he told the committee today, of foreclosures. Eakes calls the proposal by FDIC Commissioner Sheila Bair (and rejected, apparently by the Treasury Department) to use taxpayer money for a homeowner bailout "just an absolute no brainer."
What was billed as an oversight hearing on the Treasury Department bailout for Wall Street turned more into a meditation on the housing crisis and what banks benefiting from the ever-evolving bailout are doing (and not being forced to do) to help people avoid foreclosure.
There was unanimous confusion among the witnesses - bank executives, academics and consumer activists - that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson seems to have rejected a proposal by Bair to use authority within the bailout bill and $50 billion of that $700 billion program to help people with subprime loans in danger of foreclosure restructure their loans. Bair's proposal was modeled on a program enacted by FDIC to restructure the subprime loans of Indy Mac bank when it went into conservatorship earlier this year.
Dodd said the rate of foreclosures demands more systemic approach than the several voluntary programs enacted by the federal government.
"Between now and next Wednesday, some 50,000 families will go into foreclosure," he said. "Some 50,000 will lose their homes.
"It is still confounding to me why the Secretary of the Treasury and others refuse to understand this is the heart of the problem. And until we address this, this problem is not going to go away."
Dodd also accused Paulson of only pretending to look at Bair's proposal. He said he could offer mortgage relief legislation on the floor of the Senate when lawmakers return for a lame duck session next week. But without buy-in from Republicans, nothing is likely to pass next week.
Wharton Business Professor Susan Wachter told the Senators she was "puzzled why Treasury has rejected (the Bair plan)."
Bank executives were less committal, but said more should be done by the government to systematically address the foreclosure crisis.
Anne Finucane is an executive at Bank of America, which acquired Countrywide, the lender most famously undone by subprime lending. She said BofA is trying to unilaterally restructure many mortgages - 200,000 this year, she said - but said "the more we can do systematically to deal with this issue, the better."
But the bankers differ with the Democrats and activists on whether a controversial proposal to allow bankruptcy judges to unilaterally restructure mortgages would endanger the market.
Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., whose state is particularly hard hit by the foreclosure crisis, said he worried about the bankruptcy provision, but wants to see more done to help homeowner's specifically.
Dodd also castigated banks for "hoarding capital" given to them under the program and argued that the true cost of the bailout has grown to $5 trillion when you factor in the temporary bump in FDIC insurance to $250,000 per account, the bailout of insurance giant AIG and the nationalization of government mortgage backers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
"It isn't just 290 billion. It's 5 trillion. The taxpayer is really behind your institutions," he said.
But still Dodd defended the $700 billion rescue package passed this year.
"If you believe that you would be no worse off than you are today, then I invite you to return to the Treasury the billions of dollars in taxpayer investments, guarantees and discounts that you currently receive, and I wish you well as you try to make it on your own," Dodd said.
November 13, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (29)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
If this is half way, we'll be broke when it ends. Is anyone even remotely considering where all this money will come from ? There aren't enough rich people in the USA to pay the taxes on the $trillions this will all cost in the end.
Posted by: garand911 | Nov 13, 2008 11:10:17 PM
Surprised I'm not as far as increasing taxes go the rich will be 40K and above.
With the contracting tax base at federal, state, and local levels all those who think the check is in the mail are going to be disappointed.
Posted by: Hippie Smasher | Nov 14, 2008 12:48:32 AM
The term "bailout", at least to me, can be defined as a method to put up funds or collateral so that a person in need of a bailout can be temporarily relieved of their obligations until they settle what they owe. Do the crime, go to jail, get bailed out, go to court and take what is given to you. Could be back to jail if found guilty.
In the case where one borrows beyound their ability to repay the consequences are the same. You must still be responsible for your own actions, NOT ME! A bailout should not be a free ticket to get out of jail (or debt).
I have always bought what I could afford. A lot of people seem to think the American Dream is just that...a dream. Reality seems to be a bad word.
NO ONE (I MEAN, NO ONE) needs a shinny new car, a home with a swimming pool and etc. These are all (pipe dreams in a lot cases) dreams. Dreams do come true but only after one has earned it.
Sure, blame the banks and etc. if you must but please make sure you understand who signed the contract...neither the bank or myself!
Posted by: Floyd | Nov 14, 2008 10:17:26 AM
Maybe I should stop paying my mortgage too. I cant sell the house and I already have to pay for 10 other peoples houses anyway. Ill just move in with them.
Posted by: RegularGuy | Nov 14, 2008 10:37:23 AM
People need to stop daydreaming about getting a piece of the bailout.
bailout 700 billion = 700,000,000,000
US population 310 million = 301,000,000
If the bailout money was spread evenly to every citizen, it's still only about $2300 per person.
Posted by: Math Lady | Nov 14, 2008 6:30:00 PM
Oh ye unfaithful! The trillions of dollars being spent to right the oppression of the Dark Lord of Business are but mere baubles in the Kingdom of THE OBAMA! He will watch over you, save your home, your car, you vacation and much. much more! The Dark Lord is finished! Redistribution has already begun, all ye meek shall inherit their money! Yes, the financial cris is no more than a tiny step in the incredible new Kingdom of Obama.
Posted by: TheDisciple | Nov 14, 2008 9:14:39 PM
I agree 100% with Chuck. Give US the money and let US pay down or off our mortgages and debts, thereby stimulating the economy through our purchases because WE will have the liquid cash to put into the economy... not the ignorant, self serving morons who are supposed to represent us who THINK they are smarter with OUR money than they are...
Posted by: Gooch | Nov 15, 2008 1:36:46 AM
Let's say I agree with Chuck then:
a- Renters will get a landfall that I partially pay for
b- Those who make $25,000 per year get a ten year bonus
c- Let's face it, even if someone would sign an agreement to pay off (or down) their mortgages, there will be plenty of people that would get around this system.
d- What's the difference between doing it Chuck's way or the government's way....It's still my money. Why would I want either one?
If people in general knew better how to spend this (not theirs) money how did we get into this situation in the first place? Greed........period. Getting a 10 year bonus using my money will increase the greed even more. We would be back to where we are now and most likely much, much, much worse.
I have enough trouble paying taxes (which I pay and willingly providing we can still vote), why would I want to take on the additional burden of paying for others people's mistakes and greed?
Posted by: Floyd | Nov 15, 2008 3:24:09 AM
Deregulation caused this mess. The heavily regulated post-1929 stock market was fairly consistent until the Republicans decided that the "market" could regulate itself. Ronald Reagan gave us the S&L deregulation disaster that cost 1 trillion dollars (1980's money), the 1987 stock market crash, the GOP run Congress from 1994-2007 gave us a housing bubble, insanely low interest rates when they should have been high, multiple double dip recessions and now the big crash of 2006 (yes it started in 2006, long before Democrats took power on Janary 4, 2007). You think the GOP would have learned the lessons of 1929 but the very same script is playing out, straight our of the Herbert Hoover playbook.
Posted by: Rick Cain | Dec 25, 2008 11:24:20 PM
Post a comment



