« Previous | Main | Next »

The Note: Clinton Makes it 3 am for Obama Transition

Share

November 14, 2008 8:35 AM

ABC News' Rick Klein reports in Friday's Note:

So much for no drama.

Surely a certain soon-to-be-ex-senator knows this by now, but here’s the thing about Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton: She tends to steal the scenes she’s playing in.

Until the subject of her “private business” Thursday in Chicago is resolved -- and maybe until and even beyond the press conference announcing the new secretary who’s headed to Foggy Bottom -- it will be 3 am in the transition process.

The Hillary rumors are the first potential stumbling block for the smooth machine that is President-elect Barack Obama’s transition efforts -- and it revolves around a storyline that seems never to get old.

There’s a decent chance this is just flattery, and an almost-equal chance that Clinton doesn’t even want the job. But what does it say that no one is seriously waving off the possibility that Obama actually does want Hillary Clinton answering that ringing phone?

Read the rest of The Note -- and get all the latest on the 2008 election, Congress, the White House and the wide world of politics every day -- from Rick Klein by bookmarking this link.


“Discussions about Clinton, D-N.Y., being asked to accept the post are ‘very serious,’ an Obama source says,” per ABC’s Martha Raddatz, Jake Tapper, and Z. Byron Wolf. “Asked if Hillary Clinton would consider the secretary of state job, a former official in President Clinton’s administration said, ‘I think so. What would you rather do -- be senator or secretary of state?’ ”

“She's smart, she's strong, she's experienced, she's a team player, she is usually pretty diplomatic, and she also brings some gender diversity to an Obama Team concerned about such matters,” ABC’s Tapper and Sunlen Miller report. “She brings instant stature to the job, one Democrat told me. Many world leaders have known her for almost two decades.”

“But Obama and Clinton clashed frequently on international issues during their contentious primary battle,” Tapper reported on “Good Morning America” Friday. “Clinton suggested Obama was naive on wanting to talk to Iran and reckless in discussing a willingness to strike terrorists in Pakistan without government permission.”

“There's increasing chatter in political circles that the Obama camp is not overly happy with the usual suspects for secretary of state these days,” Al Kamen writes in his Washington Post column. “And Obama could put her in his speed-dial for a 3 a.m. phone call each morning.”

(Easiest joke in town: Would Bill Clinton want to fill out those Obama job application forms? Does Hillary Clinton want to go into detail about revelations that could potentially embarrass her would-be boss?)

Obama, of course, has plenty of experience with the Clintons. But in this delicate period where he remains around the presidency but not quite of it, this is one piece of the process where a little less transparency and openness could go a long way.

Continue reading today's Note by clicking HERE.

ABC News' Hope Ditto contributed to this report.

November 14, 2008 in Biden, Joe, Clinton, Bill, Clinton, Hillary, Edwards, John, McCain, John, Obama, Barack, Palin, Sarah, Washington, White House | Permalink | User Comments (38)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I not sold on Hillary as SOS. Too much drama. Would Bill Clinton come along too? What about his business dealings abroad? Too many "?" marks there. No Drama Obama. That's how it should be.

Posted by: Vanessa | Nov 14, 2008 8:51:51 AM

Obama
Biden
Clinton

the start of a more earthly "Hall of Justice"...

looks like Superman and Batman just found their Wonder Woman.

Posted by: dl | Nov 14, 2008 8:58:56 AM

# Personally participates in or directs U.S. representatives to international conferences, organizations, and agencies;
# Negotiates, interprets, and terminates treaties and agreements;

who brings more to the table and presence in negotiations... on behalf of the US and Obama...than Clinton...

and anyone who has ever seen the two letters "dl" at the end of a post comment knows I was not a fan of Clinton during the primaries.

Posted by: dl | Nov 14, 2008 9:02:00 AM

This appears to be the real deal if you listen to what has been coming out of the Obama transition team. Or it could be a well placed leak intended to soothe Hillary's ego and keep the press interested in them and not Palin.

Posted by: matt | Nov 14, 2008 9:02:19 AM

I think Richardson should be SOS and Hillary should take the next Supreme Court position.

Posted by: pt | Nov 14, 2008 9:05:14 AM

supreme court would be a waste of Hillary's actual skills and attributes...

there is a latina judge ...that mark my words is going to be Obama's first supreme court nominee.

Posted by: dl | Nov 14, 2008 9:08:46 AM

and mark my words ...if it is between Clinton and Richardson...Hillary is going to take it.

which as much as I like Richardson...he is too milktoast for the situation we have.

and to compare the effect Clinton would have in negotiating and diplomacy...and Richardson or Kerry...
well there is no comparison.

Posted by: dl | Nov 14, 2008 9:10:42 AM

CLINTON? SOS? Great! Two great Lawyers. Did I say lawyers? Didn't she say that Obama was not qualify to be President? Didn't he say that she voted for the war? Do we see a tend here? I guess we just don't care.

Posted by: CHARLIE | Nov 14, 2008 9:16:42 AM

Nonsense,

Obama may have used the Bill Clinton argument in the veep selection but we all know H & B have separate existences. I hope Hillary gets this job. I think she would be very good. 1) women are good at diplomacy. 2)by now Bill probably knows more about the world than he does about the US. So he would be an asset to her if she decided to seek his input. and 3) Matt, who is Palin?? and why would Obama and Hillary be interested in playing a children's game like that. It seems to me those two are serious grown ups interested in seriously grown up matters, unlike some baby politicians we have seen running around this week.

Posted by: Question | Nov 14, 2008 9:19:30 AM

I guess I missed the part in all the empty "Change" rhetoric were it said it would be change back to the daily dose of sleaze of the Clinton administration.

You liberals remember the Clinton administration right?

The one that was handed the most robust economy in history just to see it tank 3 months prior to it being handed to GW Bush.

The one that took millions from the Chinese government in exchange for our most highly guarded missile secrets.

The one that saw the President more interested in getting BJ's than responding to the first time the WTC was attacked.

The one that passed just the largest, but the 2 largest tax increase in US history.

The one that brought fame, glory and honor to the memory of Lincoln buy renting out his bedroom.

The one that dismantled the intelligence and military of this country that directly led to the first ever attacks on US soil by a foreign country.

The one that permitted corporate corruption to run rampant allowing for the likes of Enron, Tyco, etc; costing retirees hundreds of billions in savings.

Yeah - it sure will be refreshing to get back to those good old days. Now that’s change we can believe in.

Looks like Obama better get his step n fetchit shoes on.

Posted by: Obama - the Socialists' puppet | Nov 14, 2008 9:23:16 AM

I can understands that hispanics will want a high profile reward but I think Clinton would be great in the role.

Posted by: ed | Nov 14, 2008 9:23:22 AM

Vanessa - You're post, as always, is amusing. I've watched you post to this blog for quite a while now, almost always shaking my head at your one dimensional views when it comes to Obama. I'm glad he won, but Clinton would be an excellent SoS. I've seen your derogatory comments regarding both Clinton's throughout this election and it only shows your naivety and makes you less credible in your posts. You were obviously not paying attention in the 1990's when Bill Clinton was President during the most prosperous time for middle America in the last 35 years (perhaps you were too young to notice). The better of the two men running for President won this election - why waste your time sowing more discontent after the fact? Move on.

Posted by: mhhunt | Nov 14, 2008 9:24:49 AM

Please, just stop with the Hillary Clinton rumors. Give it a rest. ABC- you may not know this, but she lost her battle for the Presidency. She ain't gonna be Secretary of State, not after the way she treated Obama in the primaries. It will be either John Kerry or Bill Richardson. Both worked much harder for Obama.

Posted by: alison | Nov 14, 2008 9:27:42 AM

Hillary would be great for the position. The Clinton were very popular over seas. The one thing you can not deny the pair is they work well together. I believe Hillary would be a great help with Obama and foreign policy. For those that dislike Hillary, stop haten on her. The woman has worked hard to get the position she is in. And she has done nothing different than any man hasn't done.

Posted by: Storm | Nov 14, 2008 9:31:12 AM

alison,
I would want to agree with you, however I would not be unhappy with Hillary for Secretary of State. Although I still do not understand why many dislike John Kerry, I think Clinton probably brings much gravitas to the job.
I'm just not sold to the idea of Bill Richardson doing a more effective job than Hillary Clinton. Well, aren't you glad you're not the one making this choice? I can imagine it is not an easy choice for Obama. By the way, I do like the meeting with Senator McCain. One thing Senator McCain should admit-other than the Keating Five piece, Barack Obama did not go negative on him during the campaign as some would suggest.

Posted by: D | Nov 14, 2008 9:34:29 AM

who is leaking why this information?

Posted by: maz hess | Nov 14, 2008 9:36:38 AM

Question>>said a lot of sour grapes...Clintonian prosperity must not have come your way...Too bad.. For most of us, tax increases and all, we saw our
quality of life grow. We enjoyed the man's engaging disarming personality and his upbeat and world embracing rhetoric. And we were shocked but not unduly by his infidelities. Yet, to hear you, you'd think he was the great Satan. Greater then even your very own George W. Bush right Question? Slight of hand cannot remove our vision from W. - the most undemocratic, under-educated, war-mongering, corporation schmoozing, freedom dissolving, home price devaluing crack pot who thinks God told him to invade Iraq president that America has yet produced. Leave Bill alone and remove the mote from your won parties eye - we have had enough of your bitterness and slanders.

Posted by: Johnnyr51 | Nov 14, 2008 9:44:40 AM

or maybe that equally talented alaskan governor . clintons bring tooooooooo much baggage. maybe arnold and we could get a democrat in california.
jimmy carter is much more highly respected internationally ,if he would take the job,

Posted by: wo fat | Nov 14, 2008 9:45:46 AM

BTW - I don't think Hillary will pass up a long and prosperous career in the Senate for a short term job with State.

Posted by: Johnnyr51 | Nov 14, 2008 9:46:49 AM

Why? There's got to be someone else! Did he forget how dirty she is?

Posted by: TruthIsGold | Nov 14, 2008 9:52:06 AM

Post a comment