- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
The Note: Goldilocks Approach: Obama Seeks Balanced Pace
November 10, 2008 8:37 AM
ABC News' Rick Klein reports in Monday's Note:
When No. 43 hosts No. 44 Monday, the two men come to the White House riding competing historical crosscurrents -- and it’s not just that one is coming and one is going.
The future of the Republican Party hinges on the argument over whether the GOP got where it is because it was growing too big or thinking too small.
The future of the Democratic Party hinges on the argument over whether President-Elect Barack Obama will get where he needs to by acting big or aiming small.
The challenge for Obama and the team he’s putting together is in finding a Goldilocks balance, when plenty of folks want it hot, and plenty of others want it cold. He needs to deliver on his promises for change, while not eroding the promise of the broad change to politics his election meant to so many.
The new guy gets a big platform, and a bigger opportunity. Early on, he’s conveying the sense of measured action, after months of stasis in the executive branch.
Read the rest of The Note -- and get all the latest on the 2008 election, Congress, the White House and the wide world of politics every day -- from Rick Klein by bookmarking this link.
“The American people, right now, need help economically,” incoming White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos Sunday on “This Week.” “It is essential that we focus on the stress and strains on the middle class.”
Bipartisanship, now: “The challenges are big enough that there's going to be an ability for people of both parties, as well as independents, to contribute ideas to help meet the challenges on health care, energy, tax reform, education,” Emanuel said. “So that is the tone. That is the policy. And that is exactly how we're going to go forward.”
But pacing is everything: “The debate between a big-bang strategy of pressing aggressively on multiple fronts versus a more pragmatic, step-by-step approach has flavored the discussion among Mr. Obama’s transition advisers for months, even before his election,” Peter Baker writes in the Sunday New York Times. “The tension between these strategies has been a recurring theme in the memorandums prepared for him on various issues, advisers said.”
“The argument for an aggressive approach in the mold of Franklin D. Roosevelt or Lyndon B. Johnson is that health care, energy and education are all part of systemic economic problems and should be addressed comprehensively. But Democrats are discussing a hybrid strategy that would push for a bold economic program and also encompass other elements of Mr. Obama’s campaign platform, even if larger goals are put off.”
The pressure builds, already: “Saying Obama's decisive election victory amounts to a mandate, many of the president-elect's staunchest supporters, including labor leaders, are looking for strong, swift action on many of the sweeping proposals -- including reforming health care and increasing the minimum wage and indexing it to inflation -- that he pushed on the campaign trail,” Michael A. Fletcher writes in The Washington Post. “But at the same time, Obama will be under pressure from fiscal conservatives and others to restrain spending, which could cause him to move slowly on his most ambitious plans.”
Continue reading today's Note by clicking HERE.
ABC News' Hope Ditto contributed to this report.
November 10, 2008 in Biden, Joe, Bush, George W., McCain, John, Obama, Barack, Palin, Sarah, Washington, White House | Permalink | User Comments (29)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Obama is a great leader.
i think this will change up everything
in our envirment,we finally have a black
president.thank god for everything
Posted by: jasmine | Nov 10, 2008 3:23:18 PM
Remember we didn't always have unleaded gasoline, either. People adapted to it. We didn't have safety inspections for vehicles. People adapted to it.
Your analogies are extremely weak!
Germany is approx. 138,000 sq mi (just a bit smaller than the state of Montana) with a population of some 86 Million.
The US is approx 3.8 millon sq mi with a population just over 300 million.
It going to take a LOT longer and LOT more money to doanything similar to that in this country. Also, if I am to believe what you stated, they only got to 33%. So what are they doing to cover the oter 67% ?
On gas, the move to add unleaded gas did not mean your local gas station had to install an entirely new system. New pumps got installed yes, but you did not have to train people how to handle unleaded gas. Hydrogen is a much more volatile thing to deal with than gasoline. Oh and how long was it before say 99% of stations in the country had and unleaded pump?...answer...Years!
Electric Cars sound great, but try commuting in heavy traffic with them. If you facing a 50 to 75 mile commute around the greater metropolitan areas of Boston, NY, Washington Chicago, LA etc, these things are not all they are made out to be by the hype. Just like the idea your car is supposed to get the MPG thats on the sticker, most dont get that number anyway.
Simple example of why we are a long way away.
Chevrolet :
Aveo - under $13,000 with HGWY MPG of 34
Malibu Hybrid - more than double the cost for the SAME MPG!
I own a used Aveo, and im getting 33 to 35 MPG. There is no way I can possibly justify spending 26K or more on a car that does not do me any better in MPG than what I get with the used one I paid less 9K for!
I am not saying we cant get to the point we all hope for, what I am saying is it is not going to happen in 10 yrs!
Incentives are not going to make a big difference, if they did, we would already be well along the way on tihs road
Posted by: Mike_C | Nov 10, 2008 4:12:26 PM
My two cents... there is a U.S. company gearing up to RENT solar, kind of like a satellite dish. This is terrific technology. www dot dowattsright dot com
Posted by: Wayne Miller | Nov 10, 2008 5:17:32 PM
TampaLawyer: "His job is to be commander-in-chief, set policy and send legislation to Congress"
Its not the president's job to send legislation to Congress. Where did you get an idea like that?
The president does send a president's budget request. That's probably the closest thing you have to the executive branch sending legislation to the legislative branch. But the PresBud is a bunch of numbers. Its Congress that considers those numbers and then comes up with budgets in the forms of appropriations and authorization bills.
New presidents do often come with a perceived mandate, and his allies in Congress may well capture that mandate in legislation.
But the president 'leading' is really just a reference to the bully pulpit aspect of leadership in terms of having any direct authority over the nation or Congress. He is commander in chief - but again that's not a legislative function.
No where does "it" say the speaker of the House can't voice his or her opinions about what the House needs to do.
Politically it may be better for the Democrats to orchestrate less of her and more of him. But that's a party political decision - not a function of either's job.
Posted by: Paul | Nov 10, 2008 9:07:14 PM
Mike C - I don't agree the analogies are weak. Again, they aren't exact, but then they wouldn't be analogies anyway.
Yes, Germany is smaller. Not sure why that invalidates the analogy. It seems to me there is a good chance the average German uses about the same amount of electricity as the average American.
I never said Germany was completely independent of all non-solar energy sources. But what they have accomplished is impressive, and we can do that, too. We also can profit from everyone else doing, if we move fast and jump into this global market.
Yes it takes more money to buy enough solar collectors to make a similar dent in our energy proportions. But like you said we have a lot more people. And the bottom line is this is a private sector function. The government provides the proper incentives, and the private sector employs its initiative, innovation and capital. It took more money to build all our gas stations, too, since we have so many more of them than Germany.
My point with the adaptive remarks was that people can and do adapt. There was a time when we didn't have cars at all. People adapted to the technology available, and now most people have one. There will be a time when cars don't run on fossil fuels. You know that as well as I. It might be 20 years or it might be 200 years, but its going to happen. Again with the right government incentives, it can happen sooner than later, and our car makers perhaps can be among those exporting these cars to other countries - or we can buy them from other countries.
Posted by: Paul | Nov 10, 2008 9:15:25 PM
I think the auto industry is very important to our nation. I would love to be able to purchase a new well-designed AFFORDABLE and COMFORTABLE vehicle completely made in the US that gets at least 35 mpg and has air conditioning. Bells and whistles are not important and create future complications. We are still driving a 94 Buick and 87 Honda and both get over 35 mpg. Haven't found a new car we want to buy.
Posted by: Gail | Nov 10, 2008 9:16:52 PM
If the Japanese or some other society manufactures these cars, then they'll take over the market anyway. Why does anyone think they'll be made here in the states exclusively?
I don't think this country can even manufacture plastic bowls anymore. Why do we always fall into this trap that so and so is going to 'bring jobs'? Actually, they allow them to be sent overseas...and the American public buys up foreign-made stuff-and then complain that they don't have jobs. Oh, and complain about unions.
Until corporations are given the incentive to carry on profitable operations over here (lower or no corporate taxes) then they will continue to hire few, and/or move overseas and profit under more cooperative governments.
You can't have it both ways...sucking the dollars out of companies in order to punish their leadership for getting wealthy and to fund disastrous social programs while at the same time expecting to employ more Americans.
Also, as soon as more jobs become available, the Mexicans will rush in and undercut American workers.
Without dealing with those fundamental issues, it'd by like pouring water in a bucket with a big hole in the bottom.
Posted by: Grand Old Party | Nov 10, 2008 10:10:25 PM
Little Red says:
“Ooo…bama”, what a big campaign you had!
“Ooo...bama”, what a big ego you have.
“Ooo...bama”, why are you outsourcing grand children?
HELP!!!
Posted by: Little Red | Nov 12, 2008 1:09:50 AM
Smokey the Bear in The Note: Goldilocks Approach: Obama Seeks Balanced Pace
Smokey the Bear says, Watch out! It’s not hot, it’s not cold, the political porridge is still smoldering (epically in the costal areas). Liberal arsonists recently set the country ablaze with a glowing campaign, that consisted of a lot of smoke and mirrors. Have your emergency preparedness kits ready!
Posted by: Smokey the Bear | Nov 12, 2008 1:43:07 AM
Post a comment



