- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
The Note: Obama Gambles on Bailout Bill
November 12, 2008 8:29 AM
ABC News' Rick Klein reports in Wednesday's Note:
Whatever the outcome of the clash between the Bush administration and the Democratic Congress over a bailout package for Detroit, know that President-elect Barack Obama placed himself at this table -- and promptly tossed some valuable chips into the pot.
He had an easy way out: the one-president-at-a-time line. He’s just a senator until Jan. 20. He didn’t have to turn his Oval Office session with President Bush into a lobbying powwow. And with just the two of them in the room, he certainly (as the Bush team reminded him with a high hard one tossed via Drudge) didn’t have to turn private talks into a public spat.
With House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Harry Reid pushing a measure to help automakers during the lame-duck session, they have a partner in ownership: Obama.
It’s a quiet kind of power play by a president-elect who’s seeking a delicate balance: Obama, insisting that the economy needs more help now, is showing action, not just talking about it.
If it works, Obama would notch a legislative victory even before he’s president -- in a quick payoff for his union backers, and (just maybe) for a troubled industry and the economy as a whole.
Read the rest of The Note -- and get all the latest on the 2008 election, Congress, the White House and the wide world of politics every day -- from Rick Klein by bookmarking this link.
But if it fails to pass, or if it passes and then fails to work, or even if it works but fails to impress, the president-elect owns an issue that helped get him here a bit earlier -- and more completely -- than he did before.
“Democratic leaders in Congress said Tuesday they will push legislation next week to use the $700 billion Wall Street rescue fund to bail out Detroit auto makers, and President-elect Barack Obama ordered his transition team to look at ways to aid the car industry even before his inauguration,” The Wall Street Journal’s Jonathan Weisman, Greg Hitt and John D. McKinnon report.
“For Mr. Obama, the crisis in Detroit is turning into an early test of his leadership. Organized labor, including the United Auto Workers, invested heavily in Mr. Obama's campaign,” they continue. “It's a situation Mr. Obama's team had hoped to avoid, potentially giving the president-elect responsibility for an emergency before he has any real authority to deal with it. . . . For Mr. Obama, a public intervention on behalf of Detroit puts his political capital at stake on behalf of companies that have lost the confidence of investors and many consumers -- reflected in the reluctance of banks to lend to the companies and their continuing loss of market share.”
“A senior Democratic official . . . said Ms. Pelosi had decided to challenge Mr. Bush to work with the Democrats or veto aid to the teetering auto companies -- and take the blame if one of them fails,” David M. Herszenhorn and Carl Hulse write in The New York Times. “The White House has resisted calls by Congress to use the $700 billion to help the automakers, saying that money is better spent easing the credit crunch at the heart of the economic crisis.”
Key detail: “Congressional aides said Democratic leaders were coordinating their activities with [Obama’s] transition team,” Herszenhorn and Hulse report.
What of his role? “Mr. Obama does not intend to play a leading role in the [lame-duck] session. Aides said he was focused on the economic packages he would offer as president, as well as working behind the scenes with Congressional Democratic leaders,” Herszenhorn and Hulse report. “But aides have not definitively ruled out the prospect of Mr. Obama casting his vote if it was needed. His Senate replacement will not be named by then.”
Continue reading today's Note by clicking HERE.
ABC News' Hope Ditto contributed to this report.
November 12, 2008 in Biden, Joe, Bush, George W., Clinton, Hillary, Edwards, John, McCain, John, Obama, Barack, Palin, Sarah, Washington, White House | Permalink | User Comments (45)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Why don't we just call this what it is - "A Bailout of Labor Unions"! The Unions have controlled the U.S. Auto Industry for too long and outworn their usefulness. We still have the best Designers, Engineers, and Production Workers in the World, but something has to give and it should not be We The People of the United States. Put the "bailout" money into the hands of the American consumer and watch the economy recover. $428,000 to each Citizen over the age of 17 will move the economy like we have never seen it move and it will cost less than the AIG bailout!
Posted by: Jerry | Nov 12, 2008 10:35:34 AM
The 110th Congress was sworn in Jan, 2007, so that would be 1 year 10 months, not "2-1/2" years.
The crisis was cooked in the books with the policies of the GOP policies long before, and the presiding president has had his way on tax cuts and deregulation for the past eight years...now it's the dems fault?
The Great Depression, for a large part, was due to non-regulation of the banking industry, and the highly leveraged climate of Wall Street.
The current recession was fueled by lenders eager to turn mortgages regardless of ability for the borrowers to pay long term (such as ARMs that once balloned had only one outcome). And no one was watching (deregulation)
These mortgages were then flipped to other institutions who then carved them up and sold them as mortgage backed securities. Once the defaults started hitting, these became next to worthless, and trillions of dollars evaporated.
A lot of blame to go around, but to say that was caused by the dems in congress for less than two years is laughable.
Posted by: Brian | Nov 12, 2008 10:55:35 AM
Shame on you who doubted our Greatest Leader's integrity and honor.
Don't worry about the small details that he earmarked $1 mil to the employer who raised his wife's salary by 150%, and he was heartfelt and honored by the endorsement from the war criminal who sold the war to the world, the very war based on which he got where is is.
Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | Nov 12, 2008 11:01:03 AM
it's payback time, folks.
Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | Nov 12, 2008 11:02:19 AM
OFFF,
Thanks for providing a litle historical background for those who only see these issues through partisan eyes!
Posted by: Mike_C | Nov 12, 2008 11:36:17 AM
A lot of blame to go around, but to say that was caused by the dems in congress for less than two years is laughable.
Brian,
The point is that since jan 2007, they have controlled the agenda that goes on in congress. They have not in al that time put forth a bill that would have limited sub-prime lending and restored reasonable limitations on what any one borrower would be allowed to qualify for.
Barney Frank was the point-man for the dems on pressuring for these kinds of unsafe lending practices.
Certainly over the years as OFFF has shown, BOTH parties have chunks of the "blame pie". But to sit there now and claim its all GWB fault is total BS!
Posted by: Mike_C | Nov 12, 2008 11:42:58 AM
Wow. Lots of sore losers here today. LOL
Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | Nov 12, 2008 12:28:51 PM
"Wow. Lots of sore losers here today. LOL"
-------------------
LOL....you can call us that if you wish, but soon you & all sore winners wil be joining us.
Now there are no more scripted rallies to attend or flowery speeches to deliver, Obama is about to find out its MUCH MUCH harder to actually produce results thanit is to promise and blame!
Posted by: Mike_C | Nov 12, 2008 1:31:07 PM
Everyone join together stop the bailouts!!!!!
Posted by: me | Nov 12, 2008 1:50:18 PM
The way a lot of us see it is that it's not just the Republicans who are 'losers' but all Americans-well, except for Ayers, Wright, the Black Panthers, Sharpton, Dohrn, Jackson, Oprah, Walters, Matthews, Olbermann,,,OK I guess there are a lot of folks up there with a thrill going up their legs right now.
You're right. When Obama is sworn in, he'll wave that Clinton magic economic wand and fix everything.
Or, you can get a clue and follow the money and it goes right back to the Socialist operations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with the Social Democrats sitting right on top of it. And the lazy-butt Republicans who have done nothing about the GSEs,,,there again, if they did, they'd be accused of being racists and not wanting poor folks to have homes, so I guess that was a no win proposition from the get-go.
McCain was right, I believe from what I've been able to figure out-swallow the bitter pill and buy up the bad mortgages to unfreeze the credit.
Posted by: Grand Old Party | Nov 12, 2008 4:03:40 PM
BAILOUTS ARE COMPLEX BEASTS
Here is a workable plan with common sense for the U.S. Auto Industry -
Do not leave it to Paulson or Congress to come up with a creative plan or consider taxpayers' interests.
There is much creative talent hidden inside the U.S. Big 3 that has been smothered by mismanagement and the UAW.
Posted by: PacificGatePost | Nov 12, 2008 5:16:14 PM
I'm a union member myself, but am well aware of the pitfalls of that noble endeavor. These union leaders tend to be political and corrupt and routinely get their workers more money and benefits---considering decades of union elections, that adds up to a heck of a lot.
Those things, however, does the worker no good if the company folds.
Posted by: Grand Old Party | Nov 12, 2008 6:05:16 PM
BailOut!!!!
What really needs to be done
1. Buy up sub-prime mortgages...NOT at the companies cost or FMV but at a significant discount.
2. Reduce the homeowners mortgage by that discount and redue the mortgage terms this will keep people in their homes.
3. Tell the Big three to file Chapter 11 and tell the Unions that they will no longer pay the benefits.
4. Place regulation on all companies participating in the mortgage buy-back program from above.
5. In the future sell the mortgages for more than what was paid...Profit anyone!!!
6. For anyone who voted for Obama How can you increase spending, decrease taxes not possible. It's when he will break his promises not if.
Posted by: James Lewis | Nov 12, 2008 10:58:03 PM
For those of you who saying let the American auto industry go under are showing just what kind of moron's you are. If this industry goes under there won't be any recovery in America's economy. What a bunch of macaroon's.
Posted by: Hippie Smasher | Nov 13, 2008 12:36:50 AM
Whatever the people in Washington are doing - giving out bogus loans or not regulating the industry or now proposing wild patches - they have certainly fixed the stock market - down $1,000 in 5 days.
I guess this is the flood of money leaving the US. Kind of like the manufacturing jobs the Clinton administration exported in all of their trade deals. Really glad the dems got into control in 2006 and were able to do things in so quickly - nice going.
Posted by: etothex | Nov 13, 2008 2:06:23 AM
Bailed out Chrysler years ago what is good for the goose is good for all the ganders, do for one do for all or don't do for anything or anyone. Sorry people out there if you don't like it. It is just the way everyone feels. What is good for one is good for all.
Posted by: Rose Szymanski | Nov 13, 2008 10:01:01 AM
Rose, Chrysler got a loan and paid it back.
Now we are willing to give money to the big 3 and get nothing in return.
No bailout for the Union, who got the big 3 into the mess with inept mgt. Let the Union bail out the big 3 they have enough money, or did they spend it all on parties and retreats. The car companies in the south are doing fine and there is no union envolved. Look at Saturn.
Posted by: usa | Nov 13, 2008 12:15:38 PM
If the purpose for bailing out the auto industry is to save jobs, then the government should only bail out the ones who didn't outsource their labor to other countries. GM is one of those company that didn't care about the jobs of those american citizens they laid off in order to out source to countries like mexico for a $1.50 an hour for labor, but GM what those same U.S taxpayers and others to bail them out. Now that is wrong on GM's part.
Posted by: Robert Boyd | Nov 13, 2008 1:28:27 PM
If GM, Ford, and Chrysler collapse America will go into a flat spin that it will never recover from.
The stock market will tank to the 5000 range because of the domino effect.
Even if this doesn't threaten your job now your 401K will lose another 20 to 30% of it's value.
Posted by: Hippie Smasher | Nov 13, 2008 2:10:57 PM
Hey I got it!!! our country is in a financial freefall....LETS SPEND A FEW TRILLION!!!!
Posted by: Obama | Nov 13, 2008 2:23:09 PM
Post a comment



