- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Double-Teaming Pakistan
December 22, 2008 4:19 PM
ABC News' Luis Martinez and Kirit Radia Report: In another sign of how importantly the US military is taking its relationship with Pakistan, the Pentagon announced that Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen visited Pakistan earlier today for the seventh time since assuming the post more than a year ago and Pakistan's National Security Adviser Mahmud Ali Durrani, formerly the Ambassador to Washington until last May, was back in town last week for meetings with top US officials.
A brief statement released by Mullen's office says Mullen traveled to Islamabad earlier today and met with Gen. Ashfaq Kayani, Pakistan's Army Chief of Staff and Lt. Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha, head of Pakistan's controversial Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency. It was Mullen's eighth meeting with Gen. Kayani.
According to the statement, "He thanked both men for their efforts -- and the efforts of the Pakistani. government -- to arrest members of Lashkar-e-Taiba and other extremist groups involved with the attacks in Mumbai." In his meetings Mullen "urged them to support judicial efforts to prosecute the cases fully and transparently."
Mullen's previous trip to Pakistan took place shortly after the deadly terror attacks in Mumbai, India that temporarily inflamed tension between India and Pakistan. His message on that last-minute trip was to urge military restraint by both sides and to encourage Pakistan to focus attention on the terror threat posed by Lashkar-e-Taibe (LET) in the eastern Kashmir border region, a terror group suspected of having received support in the past from the ISI.
According to the statement, Mullen "encouraged the Pakistani leaders to use this tragic event as an opportunity to forge more productive ties with India and to seek ways in which both nations can combat the common threat of extremism together."
Mullen visited Pakistan after having wrapped up his participation in a week-long USO Christmas tour of the United Kingdom, Germany, Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Meanwhile, in this country, on Friday the Pakistani National Security Advisor met with top officials at the Pentagon and the State Department. Durrani met with Secretary, Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte and Rice's top diplomat for the region Richard Boucher. At the Pentagon he met with Deputy Secretary Gordon England and Policy chief, Ambassador Eric Edelman.
According to a US official, Rice pressed Durrani for Pakistan to follow through on its rhetoric to fight terror in the wake of the Mumbai attacks. She told him that Pakistan needs to turn its words into actions. In other words, Durrani was told Pakistan needs to do more to crack down on terror networks inside the country.
The official disputed reports suggesting that Durrani was "summoned" to Washington.
Meanwhile, Centcom commander General. David Petraeus has presented a proposal that would create a $2.6 billion fund to help equip Pakistan's military buy better weapons and train for a counterinsurgency. The fund would be similar to those set up for Afghanistan and Iraq and allow Centcom the financial flexibility to provide arms and training on short notice to Pakistan's military. An initial payment of $400 million could be included in the war supplemental bill that will go to Congress early next year. The fund would be beyond the $6 billion in reimbursements the US has provided to Pakistan for military operations in the tribal areas bordering Afghanistan since 9-11.
December 22, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (25)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
N.Javed,
Of course kashmiris are suffering a lot due to the ongoing clash between the Indian security forces and the LeT and the world desperately need a solution in the kashmiri issue..Let us imagine kashmir is liberated from India, then who is going to rule it? Another Taliban or a terrorist like Lakhvi?The situation will only worsen for the native people,particularly the women.There will be terrorist infestation and It will become another NWFP..The Islamic fanatics will ban education for women there.Pakistan has no control over its Government itself.Then how can we expect it to form a stable Kashmiri Government? Better be with a known devil called India than with an unknown islamic rule that will only worsen the peace process ...
Posted by: mitchell | Dec 24, 2008 12:54:29 AM
For seven years all I have heard from the left is that the real fight against al-queda is in Afghanistan and that the war in Iraq was immoral and wrong......"more troops to Afghanistan" was the battle cry (including from the president elect).
Now everyone wants to discuss the nuances of the relationship between Pakistan and India and give us their "arm chair" quarterback analysis. Mark my word.....the left will soon tire of the fighting in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Why? Because they are basically pacifists and/or isolationists who forget the attacks on 9/11 and live in a cocoon. We are not in the region to solve the India-Pakistan issues.......we are there to hunt and kill al qaeda.
Posted by: centurion666 | Dec 24, 2008 9:47:01 AM
How many of you have relatives in Armed forces?. In 9/11 you had less then 2500 died and half of them disappeared to collect insurance and it was a not lic to go and kill someone else 's eldery, women and children by thousands. Pakistan has lost thousands of soldiers fighting someone else 's drug war. War in Afghanistan USA is fighting so that Karzai brothers can run their drug trade free from any hassles. What else is the reason for war in a moutain region devoid of oil. In addition, perhaps to allow India to openly run terrorist camps in Afghanistan so that a narrow minded hindu can bogged down due to its leader 's inherrent small mindedness. Stephen Cohen just arrived from Sri Lanka and says that India is openly terrorising SL via Tamils. India is openly crossing border in Nepal with its forces and Nepali resent it every day and they are trying to bring back monarchy because at least it had some self respect.
USA liked Pakistan when it could send its offspring to fight in afghanistan against Russians and in Bosnia against serbs. Now it is fashionable to call them, terrorists and fundamentalists. How many have you fought for USA, you cowards? More Arabs and Muslims have died fighting america's dirty wars then any of you so it can be lone super power and so it can turn around and kill the people who made it a super power.One hell of a way to thank the people who got you there. India is non-consequential backward Hindu state trying to act as poodle for western world but it is clumsy and gets caught playing its dirty game and isn't going anywhere any time soon. Now that USA is bankrupt and can't hire all those substandard y2k consultants now they can apply for jobs to go on the moon and I am sure it pays well. India 's projected growth rate for next 20 years -7% slightly higher then Nepal 's.
Posted by: ray | Dec 24, 2008 5:19:34 PM
The biggest thing that must always be taken into account is Israel's role in the disruption of the Middle East. Jews of the world required a homeland after all the massive violence directed against them, and apparently Israel was the only reachable solution to this.
We should work on helping to change the minds and ideas of the millions of the world's Moslems until they understand that: 1) the Holocaust - both the European and the Russian one - did indeed happen; 2) they are not to blame for all the problems or even disparity of religious opinions between them and the Jewish people; 3) they can find a workable compromise and solutions for the parceling out of land in the Israel/Palestine region.
Until some sort of workable compromise is reached, we will continue to see the problems we have been seeing, such as terrorism and the wars and struggles in the entire region that we have been seeing.
Posted by: Karen Peralta | Dec 24, 2008 6:58:47 PM
That seems to be a pretty big investment for the U.S. to do. Hope the conflicts will eventually end soon.
Posted by: Busby SEO Test Gary Viray | Dec 24, 2008 11:32:51 PM
Post a comment



