- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
WH Blames Hamas for Violence
December 29, 2008 4:52 PM
ABC News' Kirit Radia Reports from Crawford, Texas: In the White House's first press briefing since Israel began bombing Gaza over the weekend, spokesman Gordon Johndroe towed the same line we've heard from the administration in recent days, blaming Hamas for the outbreak of violence but at no time calling on Israel to stop its retaliation.
"Hamas has once again shown its true colors as a terrorist organization that refuses to even recognize Israel's right to exist. In order for the violence to stop, Hamas must stop firing rockets into Israel and agree to respect a sustainable and durable cease-fire. That is the objective to which all parties need to be working. And that is what the United States is working toward. We also remain concerned about the humanitarian situation for the people of Gaza. We ask that all parties involved to allow food and medical supplies to reach the people there. And we appreciate the efforts of a variety of countries in the region who are working to help the humanitarian needs of the people of Gaza," Johndroe said.
"We have urged the Israelis to avoid civilian casualties, but they are working on decreasing the number of Israeli citizens that are vulnerable," he added.
President Bush has yet to inject himself into the situation since this latest round of fighting began, leaving it up to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to speak with the parties (though, consistent with longstanding policy, the U.S. has not spoken with Hamas). Instead Bush has spoken with regional intermediaries. On Saturday, he spoke with Saudi King Abdullah and then this morning with Jordanian King Abdullah.
In those discussions, Johndroe said the president told the kings, "we want to see the violence stop, but in a way that leads to a durable and sustainable succession of violence. We can't have the violence stop now only for it to start up again."
Rice, meanwhile, has spoken to several regional and world leaders about the fighting, including Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, and Defense Minister Ehud Barak. Noticeably absent from her list of calls, however, is Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.
Rice has taken the time to brief the incoming administration on the situation. Since fighting broke out she has spoken with President-elect Barack Obama and his pick for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Johndroe said he did not expect Bush to speak publicly about the situation. "At this point, we don't have any plans for the president to -- to make a statement on this. We will continue to monitor the situation. I mean, he's staying in touch with the national security adviser, as well as the secretary of state, and we'll see," Johndroe said, adding: "Secretary Rice has been the primary interlocutor."
The president has received intelligence and situational updates and this morning discussed the matter via secure video conference with Vice President Dick Cheney, Chief of Staff Josh Bolten, and National Security Adviser Steve Hadley.
"They updated him on overnight developments in the Middle East and discussed U.S. actions," Johndroe said.
Asked if the U.S. is urging Israel to avoid a ground operation in Gaza, he replied: "I can't speak to any potential ground operation. I think that any ground operation, according to the Israelis, would be part and parcel of the -- of the overall operation, given their statements saying that they don't want to retake Gaza, that they simply want to protect their people."
"I'm not going to speculate on a ground operation," he quickly added.
Asked if Israel's targets were justified, he replied: "The United States understands that Israel needs to take actions to defend itself."
Johndroe said the U.S. has not been involved in the planning or coordination of the Israeli offensive.
"The United States is not involved in this action in any -- in any specific way. The United States has provided millions of dollars of humanitarian assistance to the people of Gaza, and so we are certainly encouraging countries in the region to continue their efforts to bring medical and food supplies to the people of Gaza," he said.
So what is the president doing today?
"After his phone call with Abdullah and his intelligence briefing, he went to his office to work on paperwork and a variety of things. And I expect he'll probably ride his bicycle today and spend time with Mrs. Bush. And I expect he'll also probably receive updates on the ongoing situation in the Middle East, as well," Johndroe said.
December 29, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (33)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Megadeth
Funny, Hamas can't get water, food or power but can get rockets to fire at Israel!
Posted by: waggdogg | Dec 30, 2008 9:25:25 PM
militants, who have launched more than 400 rockets across the border since Saturday, Four days!
Can't get food or water because of Israel but can get thousands of rockets.
Who is wagging who?
Posted by: waggdogg | Dec 30, 2008 9:37:19 PM
waggdogg - As long as the settlements exist, Israel should be resisted. I don't know if the Palestinians have tried peaceful protests like maybe a sit in or tying themselves to something. I am sure Israel would do the right thing if the resistance was peaceful.....not.
Tunnels bring the rockets in. Israel controls the basic necessities. DO the research yourself. I encourage you to look at the settlement map in the West Bank.
Posted by: Huh | Dec 31, 2008 2:01:26 AM
i think the US should support neither side adn be an honest brokler for peace. we must condemn both sides for gross human rights violations.
yes, this will be the president-elect's issue to deal with. bush and co., incorporated, has done nothing constructive in 8 years.
Posted by: Paul Wall | Jan 1, 2009 5:16:18 PM
How an Israeli academic - professor of Electrical Engineering - sees it:
1: Who remembers that the world hailed when Israel retreated from Gaza 3 years ago? Gaza was about to become the Singapore of the Mid East as the wealthy Arab states were preparing to pour heaps of money into it, but then Hamas took over (which we owe to Bush's insistence on "democracy") and threw it into an age Islamic extremism.
2: Israel said back then when it left Gaza: "We dismantled our settlements in Gaza - we are out - but if you shoot at us from the area we vacated we shall hit back with all our might" but never made true on its promise - until now.
3: Hamas also poses a direct and immediate threat to the stability of the Egyptian regime, through its alliance with the "Moslem Brothers" militant opposition and Iran. If you listen to Mubarak, beyond lip service comments on Israel's action, there is scathing criticism of how Hamas prompted the current crisis by violating the last six-month ceasefire pouring volleys of hundreds of rockets on Israeli civilians days before the action - which left Israel no choice but to act.
4: It is inevitable that Israel address this existential threat from an Iranian-backed terrorist state - "Hamastan" - pouring ballistic fire into Israel, digging tunnels across the border to smuggle in homicide bombers and kidnap soldiers - having delayed our action for three years and having acted indecisively now costs many more lives on both sides (but still far less than if the action were to be further postponed). Why? Since Hamas increased the area coverage of its rockets by a factor of 16 under the cover of the last ceasefire, turning now the lives of 3/4 of a million Israelis into living hell.
5. Even though the death statistics on the Israeli side are low, whole cities are paralyzed and rendered dis-functional as people duck for cover several times a day, families living in terror under the random roulette selecting whether or not not it is their turn to get maimed or killed or have their home destroyed, each time sirens wail. The world keeps counting the casualty scores, which luckily is lower on our side but this is no life for us. In particular, in the Israeli villages and towns bordering Gaza a whole generation of Israeli kids has grown disturbed, mentally wounded, traumatized by years of repeated and continual exposure to the Hamas bombardments targeting them.
5. If left unchecked Hamas was projected to reach Tel-Aviv and Jerusalem with its ballistic terror as soon as the next wave advanced Iranian supplies made it in, as the siege of Gaza has been imperfect and increasingly more sophisticated rockets already got smuggled in, increasing the ballistic range and destructive power of the blasts. That means that if Israel did not act now, it would have had to act within a year or so with tenfold might, in order to address this existential threat to itself and to the stability of the whole Middle East.
6. I view it as the utmost responsibility of my government to protect my fellow citizens, and I have been personally appalled that action has not been taken sooner - but better late than later.
Posted by: Moshe Nazarathy | Jan 2, 2009 4:10:19 AM
Those with a sense of history recall the San Remo Conference, confirmed by the League of Nations July 24, 1922 and Article 2: "The Mandatory (British) shall be responsible for placing the country (Palestine) under such political, administrative and economic conditions as weill secure the establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble, and the development of self-governing institutions, and also for safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion. That objective obviously never happened because the ultranationalist Zionist movement wanted all of the territory of Palestine for itself and democratic principls could go fly a kite. The debacle in Palestine, and the Middle East itself, can be blamed on Zionist as well as Islamist extremism. In addition the heavy handed pro-Zionist lobbying in Washington is directly responsible for our own misguided and misdirected policies regarding that convoluted territory beginning with the Truman administration. Non-Jewish Palestinians have, by and large, been skunked out of their homes, their land, their properties, and not given the 'right of return' much less war crimes compensation for their misery. Further, US foreign policy has, in effect, aided and abetted the rise of extremist Islamist radicalism with glaring examples of our own foreign policy mismanagement in Iran leading to the hostage crisis, the continuing fiasco in the former British Palestnian Mandate, and the unsrupulous branding and markieting of the Third Reich's genocide, murder, violence and ethnic cleansing as the Zionist "holocaust', while those very same Zionists engage in their own versions of such unlawful acts which, in the case of the atrocities of WWII, were at least handled properly by the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals and also at Regensburg under that authority. We taxpayers are paying a heavy price for a totally blown Middle East foreign policy over several administrations beginning in 1948. In Palestine there must be moderation, mutual cooperation, and governance insuring fairness, full equality, freedom and justice for all without regard to race, ethnic origin or religion and an end to the extremism and heavy handed political policies by both competing sides. Its time for the international community to step in and administer and management the Palestinian problem - equally, for all.
Posted by: Iowa lad | Jan 2, 2009 2:18:29 PM
Those with a sense of history recall the San Remo Conference, confirmed by the League of Nations July 24, 1922 and Article 2: "The Mandatory (British) shall be responsible for placing the country (Palestine) under such political, administrative and economic conditions as weill secure the establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble, and the development of self-governing institutions, and also for safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion. That objective obviously never happened because the ultranationalist Zionist movement wanted all of the territory of Palestine for itself and democratic principls could go fly a kite. The debacle in Palestine, and the Middle East itself, can be blamed on Zionist as well as Islamist extremism. In addition the heavy handed pro-Zionist lobbying in Washington is directly responsible for our own misguided and misdirected policies regarding that convoluted territory beginning with the Truman administration. Non-Jewish Palestinians have, by and large, been skunked out of their homes, their land, their properties, and not given the 'right of return' much less war crimes compensation for their misery. Further, US foreign policy has, in effect, aided and abetted the rise of extremist Islamist radicalism with glaring examples of our own foreign policy mismanagement in Iran leading to the hostage crisis, the continuing fiasco in the former British Palestnian Mandate, and the unsrupulous branding and markieting of the Third Reich's genocide, murder, violence and ethnic cleansing as the Zionist "holocaust', while those very same Zionists engage in their own versions of such unlawful acts which, in the case of the atrocities of WWII, were at least handled properly by the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals and also at Regensburg under that authority. We taxpayers are paying a heavy price for a totally blown Middle East foreign policy over several administrations beginning in 1948. In Palestine there must be moderation, mutual cooperation, and governance insuring fairness, full equality, freedom and justice for all without regard to race, ethnic origin or religion and an end to the extremism and heavy handed political policies by both competing sides. Its time for the international community to step in and administer and management the Palestinian problem - equally, for all.
Posted by: Iowa lad | Jan 2, 2009 2:18:32 PM
Yes, what we need is a Carter II to bring peace to the Middle East like the first one...wait a second, he did bring peace didn't he? After all, he won the same Nobel Peace Prize Al Gore did, and if that doesn't indicate absolute Righteousness, then I don't know what does.
Posted by: Grand Old Party | Jan 3, 2009 2:17:57 PM
Iowa lad
in 1948 there were 2 states set up in Israel-- Arab and Jew.The Jew getting all the worst part of the country, but they didn't care. they were getting a home land. 5 Arab countries met with the Arabs in Palestine. They said that they were going to invade and that they could either stay and fight or leave. The cowards left and let the fighting up to the others. When they left the Arabs that fought hated their Arab brothers for being cowards and leaving.The so-called " Palestinians " have been living in refugee camps for over 60 years in the Middle East because their Arab brothers hate them for being cowards. We can plainly see that the palestinians are still cowards by hiding behind WOMENS' Skirts and CHILDREN.
Islam was founded in Blood and continues in Blood. Islam is the ONLY major religion where their god REWARDS them for MURDER. Also Remember WHY the Middle East was broken up in the first place--- backing the Germans in WWI. The same people who backed Hitler in WWII. Another fact one needs to remember is that when Muslims are not Killing Jews or Christians or Europeans etc. the are killing themselves--Sunni VS Shiite. they cannot decide who they hate more.Until the World wakes up and smells the coffee to truly see what kind of people we are dealing with there will NEVER be peace.
Posted by: alan stein | Jan 3, 2009 6:38:54 PM
alan stein - Bad land. They got the coast. Now the are settling the region near the Jordan River in the West Bank. Hardly the bad land that you speak of.
Posted by: Huh | Jan 4, 2009 2:56:17 AM
Placing blame in a bar room brawls never solves the problem. ...........
Posted by: Ohg Rea Tone | Jan 4, 2009 12:59:28 PM
Can't say I would expect anything else from Bush and Cheney. . I will not shed a tear as they go.
Posted by: Ben Straub | Jan 4, 2009 6:39:47 PM
"I never felt more SAFE than when I walked UNARMED in the Indian Villages" ~ William Penn during French Indian War
Posted by: Nancy Mehegan | Jan 5, 2009 4:08:17 PM
Post a comment



