- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Obama and Bush Teams Play War Games
January 13, 2009 10:45 AM
ABC News' Jennifer Duck reports: Teams 43 and 44 unite at the White House today to play out a hypothetical terrorist attack. The mock attack exercise will include improvised explosive devices hitting transportation, infrastructure and economic targets in numerous U.S. cities.
Top officials from the incoming Obama team will meet their counterparts on the outgoing Bush team for a 90-minute orientation in the Situation Room, the nerve center of the White House. Following orientation, the teams will head across the street for a two hour disaster exercise in a large room of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. The incoming Obama team will be seated next to its predecessors at tables with big screen monitors displaying slides explaining the scenario.
Senior officials from both teams, include Cabinet secretaries, national security advisers and anti-terrorism officials. Representatives from the press office will also participate in the drill. Attendees include Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who is serving as the incident manager, and FBI Director Robert Mueller III and Deputy FBI Director John Pistole.
"They have the utmost participation as well as we do in making sure that everybody understands," incoming White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel told reporters outside the White House as he stood alongside Josh Bolten, the current chief of staff. "And as Josh said, there's nothing perfect to this, but you only get good by practicing."
Bolten first recommended the exercise when he met with Emanuel after the election. Emanuel thanked both Bolten and President Bush for their efforts in a "seamless ... handoff to president-elect Obama's administration."
"In the post-9/11 world, this isn't just good mannered, good government; it's a national security responsibility," Bolten said before the meeting. "In keeping with that understanding of the national security responsibility, we are today undertaking an unprecedented homeland security exercise."
Orchestrated by the Department of Homeland Security, the joint practice run is unprecedented but both teams agree it's necessary in this wartime transition.
"As Republicans and Democrats, we disagree on a lot of policy issues, but we agree completely that we want this new team to be as successful as they possibly can be especially in the areas of national and homeland security," Bolten explained. "And this morning's activities, I think, will be an important contributor to that."
Emanuel praised Bolten for his hard work in helping the incoming administration. "I've now been over with Josh one way or another four separate times. I'm going miss you," Emanuel said, smiling. "The good news is I have his cell phone, and I'll be able to reach him because, at the end of the day, as we said at that breakfast, all of us, we were here as employees of the American people working on their behalf every day to ensure both their safety and their security."
January 13, 2009 | Permalink | User Comments (66)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
LOl....we
have to teach Obama's team before he takes office. What? Did he pick an unqualified cabinet to go along with his unqualified abilities?
Posted by: chattyway | Jan 13, 2009 11:20:30 AM
Sounds like fun.
Posted by: Huh | Jan 13, 2009 11:27:54 AM
chattyway
So you don't think that our leaders should normally have drills on how to protect us?
Posted by: jock59801 | Jan 13, 2009 11:30:15 AM
Wait a minute.......I thought Obama and his team were the most qualified for the job?? Why do they need so much hand holding from a "failed administration"??? I thought we were going to see "change"??
SUCKERS!
Posted by: Ken | Jan 13, 2009 11:34:33 AM
Ken
Both Administrations, as well as most of us, think that our national security is more important than partisan bickering. You apparently do not.
Posted by: jock59801 | Jan 13, 2009 11:42:37 AM
Trevor - All of the Americans I know want Gitmo closed. The entire world wants Gitmo closed. It has become a symbol of our national embarrassment. A sign that maybe America is not so exceptional after all. Since the Muslim extremists already believed that, I doubt they care either way.
Posted by: jock59801 | Jan 13, 2009 11:51:00 AM
When you start a new job, do you get handed the keys to the office and the boss says "here ya go!" with no orientation? Whats the problem with new people learning from the experience and mistakes of the previous administration?
Posted by: dave | Jan 13, 2009 11:52:22 AM
@ Trevor - Which Americans want Gitmo open? The 25%ers that still nuzzle Bush's lower appendage? The rest of us have figured out that they stocked the place mostly with dirt farmers, hand picked by other dirt farmers who got paid by US to "show 'em the terrorists". If these people are the "worst of the worst" as Rumsfeld, et.al have proposed on numerous occasions, why can't they get ONE conviction? Why have they let so many of the worst of the worst go without even an indictment? How does Gitmo conform to international treaties, i.e. THE RULE OF LAW? How does Gitmo enhance our moral standing in the world, which we claim to hold, and hold over other countries when it suits our need? Close Bush's torture fantasy porn house! Tell the world what these people did wrong and punish them, or let them go. It's that simple.
Posted by: wakeup people | Jan 13, 2009 11:53:06 AM
appauled - And why should we care what Rupert Murdoch thinks?
Posted by: jock59801 | Jan 13, 2009 11:54:02 AM
Wow. What a bunch of sore losers. Do you guys read your own comments? You'd think the election was still on. In case you hadn't noticed, you lost the election, which means you are in the minority. The rest of us hope you will cease this non-productive whining and come join us do our best to rebuild this nation. BTW, I'm very glad the surge worked. It's one of the only strategies that did. Bush deserves credit where credit is due. But his 8 years are up, and there is still no way I would ever have voted for Palin/McCain. If you want to have any hope of success in 4 years you better find a better pair of candidates than those two...
Posted by: cwm9 | Jan 13, 2009 11:58:36 AM
After Obama guts the intelligence community and prevents us from detecting future attacks, he will need this practice. If this happens on Obama's watch, he will be impeached for stupidity.
Posted by: brian | Jan 13, 2009 11:59:06 AM
Let's just give the new administration a chance. Besides, it is the "United" States future that is at stake.
Posted by: bk | Jan 13, 2009 12:02:45 PM
applauded: ready for another shock? al-Quaida in Iraq did not even exist until AFTER we invaded Iraq. It was formed there as a response to our attacks. So we attacked a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, that had no weapons of mass destruction, and no al qaeda presence. We created the situation for al-Quaida in Iraq to form, and now we've supposedly gotten rid of the last remnants of the group that we allowed to form by our own irresponsible actions. Doesn't seem like much to brag about.
Posted by: charles | Jan 13, 2009 12:13:10 PM
Wonder if the outgoing team will instruct the incoming team about such things as torture, rendition and illegal wiretaps on American citizens?
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | Jan 13, 2009 12:25:16 PM
The point about Gitmo is that we do not know how many of the detainees are criminals. They have never been charged nor tried.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | Jan 13, 2009 12:31:42 PM
Then send them back to their countries. Do not give them asylum in USA like Obama wants to give them unless you want them living next door to you.
Posted by: Simon | Jan 13, 2009 12:33:26 PM
How about those Muslim Americans who got booted off the AirTran flight recently? American citizens, born here, not naturalized. That was pure profiling and is reminiscent of our incarceration of Japanese Americans during WWII, a shameful part of our history.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | Jan 13, 2009 12:35:31 PM
"asylum in the USA"
No one is talking about that.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | Jan 13, 2009 12:38:20 PM
Simon
I think he can walk and chew gum at the same time. But the closing of Gitmo is as much a symbolic act as anything else. A sign to the world that America is ready to act like America again. I can't think of anything much more important than that.
Posted by: jock59801 | Jan 13, 2009 12:45:09 PM
Well stated, Jock. We are a nation of laws and respect for human rights and due process, something seemingly forgotten over the last eight years.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | Jan 13, 2009 12:47:08 PM
Post a comment



