I hope that ICC to do somthing in Gaza

The African Union, Arab League, Islamic nations, G-77 nations 130 countries, China Russia are siding with Sudan against International Criminal Court. If the UN Security Council does not delay or rescind ICC criminal charges these nations will revoke the International Criminal Court charter. Susan Rice United Nations ambassador has overplayed her hands in setting up Omar al-Bashir for war crimes so that western corporations can cease control of Sudan’s natural resources. Susan Rice has working on ceasing Sudan’s natural resources sense the Clinton administration. Susan Rice was playing checkers against Sudan but the rest of the third world knew her plans and these nations played chess against Susan Rice and checkmated her. Susan Rice boss President Barack Obama now has to deal with Susan Rice abortion by appointing a special envoy retired Air Force General Scott Gration. Not good for Susan Rice a major failure less than a month on the job. Why Sudan is so important? In the last 5 years their oil deposits are 5 to 10 times larger than expected and huge high-yield deposits of Gold Silver Platinum Uranium and other precious metals were discovered. Sudan’s agricultural land has the richest red volcanic soil in the world but poor water distribution. A new dam was completed with 1 gigawatt of electricity and water for a massive water irrigation system. Soon Sudan will not need any food aid and will be a major food exporter.
Susan Rice foreign policy disasters
Should the African Union draw up list of undesirable people banned from the African continent it should be Susan Rice and her family at the top of the list. Susan Rice is responsible genocide in Rwanda supplying weapons Sudanese People's Liberation Army (SPLA) which has waged a totally unsuccessful but nevertheless genocidal war against the Sudan government since 1983. While Susan Rice was engaging in highly publicized shuttling among Central African capitals, to demand that Congo allies Angola and Zimbabwe withdraw their troops from the Congo, in order to prevent a "wider conflagration, her underlings were in the process of vetting private contractors to give logistical support to the Ugandan- and Rwandan-backed rebels in the Congo. Every policy that Susan Rice has formulated has been a complete failure ending in millions of innocents Africans lives lost. If there is anyone who should be put on trial for war crimes in Africa it would be Susan Rice. If Susan Rice would be ever convicted of war crimes I would the first to pull the switch to save more millions of future Africans lives.

Phil,
Take it easy, man. Don't you think you're getting carried away with Susan Rice. You're way off when you say "If Susan Rice would be ever convicted of war crimes I would the first to pull the switch to save more millions of future Africans lives."
I think the U.N. should come down on Eritrean fascist like a ton of bricks. That would solve the problems of the Horn of Africa.

This is a wonderful post. Phil, I agree you should lay off Susan a bit. I think Barack is doing a pretty decent job and has taken many steps to show that he is serious about eliciting change in the Executive Office. I think that there are still a lot of challenges, and you can expect that it will not always be easy and that he will have to make many tough and unpopular decisions.

which side will Obama's envoy be supporting? The Muslim government (and slavers and genocide formentors) of the Northern Sudan or the exploited and starving Christian and animist people in the Southern part of Sudan? Will Obama ask his "cousin" Odinga for advice in the region (you recall how Odinga was partially successful in his campaigns by ethnic tensions, ethnic violence, and allying himself with Muslims.)

Wait a minute...The President declared in his Trinidad speech the new US policy of 'non interference' in another country's affairs.
Yet, we are sending an envoy to Sudan to try and interfere in their country's internal affair regarding Darfur?

Which is it, Mr. President? Is it, 'we'll make exceptions (genocide, for example) in Africa but in Latin America, any revolution is perfectly acceptable to America now?'

You can't have it both ways, folks.