Realty Check

Tough talk on all things housing -- booms, busts, bargains and more -- from "Nightline" correspondent Vicki Mabrey

« Previous | Main | Next »

Cutting Our Dependence on Foreign Oil

August 27, 2008 4:53 PM

Vicki Mabrey reports:

Back from an amazing shoot in Uganda, a productive and fun vacation in London and Italy, and now glued to the convention coverage.

Did anybody else find Montana governor Brian Schweitzer's remarks Tuesday night thought-provoking? Apparently he was the designated attack dog on energy: to combat "skyrocketing fuel prices," he talked about biofuels, wind energy, solar power, and "coal gassification" (okay, lost me there).

"There just isn't enough oil in America, on land or offshore, to meet America’s full energy needs," he said. "Barack Obama understands the most important barrel of oil is the one you don't use."

Leaving politics aside, that last line struck me as the most important of all. The most important barrel of oil is the one you don't use, indeed.

I would take his thinking a step further. I'm all for exploring alternative energy sources, but what about human energy? Walking, strolling, cycling, scooting? That, in fact, is a huge difference between European countries and the United States. We are a culture built around the car. They are a culture built around humans. I was walking around the ancient Roman-walled city of Lucca, Italy, thinking that I saw more people in a day on the streets there than I would see in a month in my hometown of St Louis or any other comparable U.S. city (with the exception of New York, of course). I saw people, even the gray-haired men and women, walking and riding what we call "sit-up-and-beg" bicycles. Each evening I made sure to look for the Gang of Four -- a lovely and girlish group of four 70-something women, who convened on a particular park bench each night around 9, eating their gelatos and laughing. All day and into the evening I saw all ages out perambulating -- that's really the best word to describe it. Strolling, meandering, gelato in hand, talking to their neighbors.

I'm picturing my parents' suburban Saint Louis home as I write this and I know it's a generalization, but in many cases the description is apt: We wave to the neighbor as we get the mail, then pull our cars out of our garages and drive to the convenience store for a gallon of milk. How much energy does that use? Wouldn't it be more energy efficient if we lived in neighborhoods with shops downstairs or down the street, where we walked to get our milk, rode the train or the bus to work, and took the car out just for that rare Sunday sightseeing drive?

Montana's governor got it right: the most important barrel of oil is the one you don’t use.

August 27, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (15)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Coal gassification is just converting coal to natural gas (usually by heating). You can also make gasoline if you try hard enough (the germans did this in WWII, and I believe south africa did this during the apartheid era). The only problem is you use a lot of energy to convert from one form to another...although in the case of generating natural gas that then is used to make electricity its a pretty good combo.

Posted by: Angelo Kandas | Aug 27, 2008 5:30:23 PM

Well said. But be prepared to be attacked.

If someone says we should have health insurance for all Americans, they say "socialist". If someone says we should increase the CAFE standards, they say "socialist".

Regarding the former, didn't Jesus say "heal the sick"? What would the conservatives amoung us say about him if he said that today?

Posted by: John's conscience | Aug 27, 2008 5:38:32 PM

Walking, strolling, biking. Well, that's a great idea. Except for those of us living in the heartland and 20 miles away from any grocery store. And in my case 22 miles from where I work. To ride a bike 44 miles a day and do hard labor on the job. Could be a little much. Not to mention a little cold in the winter when the wind chill is -10. This is what frustrates most about comments like these. Like we're lazy. Next year take a vacation through rural Ohio and Kentucky. And then head on out west. Spend some time in the real country side. Farm country.Even the high gas prices are affecting my Amish neighbors. Costs more to feed the livestock and their horses. They are struggling too.

Posted by: Miki | Aug 27, 2008 5:58:51 PM

City living is now and has always been the most sensible, most civilized way to go. In my Baltimore neighborhood, I can and do walk to the bank, the grocery store, the bookstore, the wine shop, the museum, the university, the dry cleaner, the cobbler, the hospital, several restaurants including one of my favorites in the whole city, the weekly Farmers Market, several bus lines, and the train station. I see my neighbors all the time, talk to the dogwalkers and mothers with children in strollers, chit-chat with the garbage men and mail carriers, keep up with neighborhood news. It's a great life.

Posted by: Lisa Simeone | Aug 27, 2008 6:03:41 PM

Miki--
I completely understand -- I'm not saying this would work in rural America. I'm talking about redesigning cities -- where people already live closer together. Take London, for instance.. Many of its neighborhoods once were separate villages, with their own butcher, 'fruiterer', baker, dry cleaner, etc. They've all grown into one big metropolis now, but it means that every neighborhood is walkable, and most services that you need, you will pass on your way home from work. Instead, we build subdivisions which are all about having houses with huge lawns and not a single store or business within a mile. There's no reason to walk -- there's nowhere to walk to! But I guess it's all about size and resources -- we're a huge country, and things have been cheap for us for a very long time, so we spread waaaaaaaay out. Well, now we may need to rethink some of that and get 'cozy' again.

Posted by: Vicki Mabrey | Aug 27, 2008 8:16:16 PM

When one makes the choice to live in the city one of the main attractions is the ability to walk to your destination. In Baltimore, from my Oakenshawe neighborhood, I can walk to the grocery store, the farmer's market, the book store, coffee shop and on and on but also the Baltimore Museum of Art, Johns Hopkins University, the library, a major medical center and variety of parks and restaurants. You interact and indeed, live within your community. I know my neighborhood. I rarely need to use my car and in fact, my husband and I have only one car now. We combine trips when we do need to use it. It is a healthier, safer way to live as well as more energy efficient. A walking life is a more involved life.

Posted by: MiMi | Aug 27, 2008 8:18:26 PM

The key here is planning. So much of today's American urban sprawl seems unplanned.

Posted by: SpinMan | Aug 27, 2008 9:44:51 PM

Well there's also a lot of money to save when you don't have a car.

Insurrance , gasoline, tires,repair , windshield washer oil etc...
Car payment.

A couple thousands dollars every year on and on, it's incredible the amount of $ we spend on cars.

The issue also is that when we build infrastructure of civil ingeneering we think about cars not pedestrian.

Posted by: andre | Aug 28, 2008 4:22:50 AM

One thing about such debates is that what you hear from politicians is rarely based on fact, like Schweitzer's completely false statement "There just isn't enough oil in America, on land or offshore, to meet America’s full energy needs,"
Get educated on oil shale, oil sands, and other oil fields that have been arbitrarily set aside, and you would find that there is over 60 years worth of domestic fuels available.
One example of screwball energy policy is the offshore drilling ban. These same areas will be soon drilled by China (they are already using Cuban fields). Is it somehow better for the USA environment if China harvests that energy instead of the USA?

Posted by: rider89 | Aug 28, 2008 9:48:48 AM

I blame the Republicans and their fearmongering. That's what started "white flight" and "suburban sprawl." They also support large corporations that are against new technology and alternative energy because too much of their profit would have to be spent on redesigning their factories to retool for new products.

Posted by: Lance | Aug 28, 2008 11:15:43 AM

I blame the Republicans and their fearmongering. That's what started "white flight" and "suburban sprawl." They also support large corporations that are against new technology and alternative energy because too much of their profit would have to be spent on redesigning their factories to retool for new products.

Posted by: Lance | Aug 28, 2008 11:15:55 AM

rider89 needs to do some more research. The Dittoheads think that drilling in Alaska is the answer to all our energy needs despite the fact that all conventional wisdom says that the oil they find there would only support the US for 6 months. Why destroy a beautiful, pristine area for so little? Because it keeps the public from concentrating on real problems/solutions.

Posted by: Frank Johnson | Aug 28, 2008 11:20:04 AM

I'd be willing to bet the technology for sustainable solar energy, electric energy and wind energy already exists, but is being kept under wraps by conservative politians who are owned by big business!!!

Posted by: Hattie McLaurin | Aug 28, 2008 11:23:03 AM

Frank,
you have demonstrated my point exactly.

Posted by: rider89 | Aug 28, 2008 2:16:54 PM

Dear Mrs. Vicki Mabrey
Humane energy as an alternative source of transportation. What could be included in that? The ability to ride a bike to school, to work, to a friend’s house the list is endless. I sat down one day and had a conversation with my children and together came up with the idea of inventing a better bike as a novelty experiment. We succeeded and were able to fit together four sprockets and two chains on one bicycle. At the time my daughter was fifteen and my boys were thirteen. Three years later I have made changes to the bike and came up on other ways of making bicycling faster for the riders.

Posted by: B Lopez | Oct 31, 2008 12:54:43 AM

Post a comment