Ned Potter is the science correspondent for ABC's "World News with Charles Gibson." He has reported on such topics as space exploration, the human genome and climate change.
RECENT POSTS
- Mars Rover: Stuck in the Mud
- Tranquility Base
- NASA's Ares 1-X Test: The View From Above
- The Yes Men
- The Missing Link -- Not
- Moon Crash Kicked Up Plume After All
- Moon Crash: Where's the Water?
- Green Apple: Firm is Latest to Leave U.S. Chamber of Commerce
- Recovery.gov: Your Tax Dollars at Work
- Climate: Power Companies Quit U.S Chamber of Commerce
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Watson Apologizes
October 18, 2007 10:32 PM
James D. Watson, quoted in Sunday's Times of London as suggesting black Africans had inferior intelligence, has now put out a statement of apology:
"I cannot understand how I could have said what I am quoted as having said," Watson, 79, said in a statement he gave to the AP. "To all those who have drawn the inference from my words that Africa, as a continent, is somehow genetically inferior, I can only apologize unreservedly. That is not what I meant. More importantly from my point of view, there is no scientific basis for such a belief."
Meanwhile, the Cold Spring Harbor Lab, where he's chancellor, announced Thursday night it is suspending Watson from administrative duties, "pending further deliberation by the Board."
Meanwhile, criticism continues to pour in. Details HERE.
Francis Collins, who headed the Human Genome Project: "Jim has a penchant for making outrageous comments that are basically poking society in the eye."
Mike Botchan, a molecular biologist at Berkeley, as quoted by AP: "I think Jim Watson is now essentially a disgrace to his own legacy. And it's very sad for me to say this, because he's one of the great figures of 20th century biology."
October 18, 2007 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (40)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
It's amazing how prison and nearing death in old age can bring people to reach moral conclusions. Regardless what he said....I do believe it is feasible that U.S slave owners did some selective breeding for brute strength and stamina over intelligence....common sense would dictate not wanting a highly intelligent slave population.
Posted by: Doug | Oct 19, 2007 7:34:51 AM
I have read the comments here and it has brought tears to my eyes. I am more disturbed by these blogs that what Dr. Watson said. I read Dr. Watsons statement and thought...ridiculous. I read these blogs and thought.. Has the entire world lost it's mind? How can we call ourselves evolved in any way, scientifically, emotionally, intellectually or politically and still generalize entire races by certain attributes. I am ashamed and embarrassed that the human race still finds the need to indulge any form of racial degradation for what ever reason. I think Dr. Watson proved that being white does not make you intelligent. But we as a whole continue to prove that being apart of the human race does not make us human. Shame on us.
Posted by: Mrs Smith | Oct 19, 2007 7:49:37 AM
It is undeniable that there are evolutionary differences between the races. However, it is immoral to judge someone by the color of their skin and not by the content of their character.
Posted by: Bob | Oct 19, 2007 7:53:10 AM
I think the only thing that is apparent here is that whites want so desperately and firmly to establish their dominance and cultural/racial superiority in the world. Period. Among the peoples of the world, whites are the most "insecure" and "neurotic" about race--always wanting to point out the supposed weaknesses of others. It's always the same old argument--Africans have not developed nation states like Europeans and Asians therefore they must be inferior! But science doesn't support any intelligence differences among the races (according to Watson himself). So, could it be possible that all of the differences that we see among people are either social contructs or geographical adaptations? Let's put this to rest people, it's pointless and counter-productive. We've got much more important work to do--like making the world a better place for all!
Posted by: Boknows | Oct 19, 2007 7:55:54 AM
One only needs to read the above posted comments to realize how irrationally prejudiced some Americans are. If this is an indication of the views of a cross-section of the readership of ABC, then it is indeed sad.
Anyone that really cares know, should read Steven J. Gould's book "The Mismeasure of man." It will explain to you how most "intelligence testing" stack the cards against individuals of African origin.
Posted by: Kwame | Oct 19, 2007 7:56:15 AM
Just like in Germany, many things are simply not allowed to be said in modern day America. So much for freedom, we can carry death-wielding guns but we can't say what we believe.
Posted by: Matt Tresott | Oct 19, 2007 8:01:59 AM
this old man spoke his mind and said what he had said. there is no need to apologyze because he said it in the first place. my point is anyone can say anything for instance " apes are smarter than blacks " and go back and take his or her statement back and apologyse. i think it too easy, people just need to be careful when they open their mouths.
Posted by: Reno | Oct 19, 2007 8:27:55 AM
You know, it might just be easier to apologize for the crime against humanity that was slavery and African colonisation than repeatedly attempting (futily) to justify how we continue to rob the planet of talent and resource by operating an "Invisible Africa" agenda.
Reading some of the comments here, you wouldn't believe that the scientist himself said the following "To all those who have drawn the inference from my words that Africa, as a continent, is somehow genetically inferior, I can only apologize unreservedly. That is not what I meant. More importantly from my point of view, there is no scientific basis for such a belief."
Regardless! Assuming that most of those writing here (and struggling to find some basis to reaffirm their bigotry) can use the internet; I would suggest a quick and rudimentary research to confirm or deny the following: 1. That Africa actually had a history before the Europeans arrived. 2. Egypt, Lunda and the great recorded history and historical structures we sometimes marvel at are actually in Africa. 3. That democracy as we know it today was invented in the Shongai Empire, Oh yes in Africa. The list goes on..
The annoying misnomer in all this is that people continually confuse race and ethnicity. There is only ONE human race with diverse ethnicity. To hear some treat the issue as if people from other continents are a different species only confirms that as a whole, WE are not very bright at all!
Posted by: Human_Plain_And_Simple | Oct 19, 2007 8:51:54 AM
Is it too hard to believe that their are genetic differences based on race. If it happens in the animal kingdom why not humans. I believe, in general Asians are Smarter than Whites, Whites are smarter than Blacks. But I also believe Blacks are better athletes than Whites and Whites are better athletes than Asians. Are these Racist statements? Or can they be proven scientifically IN GENERAL? Of course there are always exceptions. Think about it.
Posted by: Dean O | Oct 19, 2007 9:15:13 AM
Mr. Watson’s comments are from a man who has been economically and socially blessed. Perhaps if he spent time in Africa trying to survive in an oppressed society that not only has it riches of diamonds, oil and other precious resources taken away; but also has to fight for a daily meal. All humans are born with the ability to learn and how much they develop are based on a myriad of circumstance including; what opportunities are available in their geographical location, be it Africa or New York City. From the living room of comfort, Americans can make any comment, the food is good, TV’s on, air or heat is on. and make a comment that someone is not as intelligent. Now real intelligence may be tracking an animal in the woods or on the African Plain to survive, to feed your family. Now some of us depend on welfare to do that but we can read about it in a book, does that make us more intelligent, no matter what race we are? Hey lets Google on how to fix the world’s problems, we all have that don’t we? We are all in this fish bowl together; and the words of wisdom from a man that found forgiveness in his heart, “Can we just get along”.
Posted by: Winston-Salem, NC | Oct 19, 2007 9:29:37 AM
I have long heard the argument that, in general, "blacks are better athletes than whites." But I know this to be false. I have participated in a mixed-race basketball league for several years and have encountered numerous white players that were incredible athletes and numerous black players that were average athletes. The difference largely appears to be the individual committment to the game. I think whites have as much capacity as blacks to successfully compete in track and field sports but a lot of whites are discouraged because society says that they can't compete with blacks, so they never even try! So, the low number of whites in track is not necessarily biological, but probably more sociological!
Posted by: boknows | Oct 19, 2007 10:10:04 AM
Um, yeah, right, Dr. Watson; you're a day late and a dollar short with the mea culpa. Time to put your money where your mouth is. Consider yourself guilty by self-proclamation. It will take some genuine work on your part to prove your innocence again.
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | Oct 19, 2007 10:16:11 AM
Yes, different populations of humans would have evolved small differences due to geographic separation. The problem is that the terms "black" and "white" do not refer to different populations of humans. Each of these "groups" contain a wide diversity of populations, with a great deal more variation within the groups than between them (with the diversity being highest in Africa). Groups that are lumped together because of general skin color are not necessarily even related to each other. "White" and "black" are strictly cultural terms with no basis in evolutionary history. And no difference in intelligence has been found between the groups anyway, not surprisingly.
Posted by: jock59801 | Oct 19, 2007 11:58:17 AM
Those Nobel Prize Pickers sure pick the best ones don't they? Gore's right up there with this idiot, Arafat, and Lê Ðức.
Posted by: TexBork | Oct 19, 2007 2:07:52 PM
Think about evolution people, the fish who stayed in the water cannot be as smart as the one who went out and learned new things. They are both related but the one that went out of the water is more intelligent of course. I am not trying to be racist but this is true. Dr. Watson isn't saying this from being racist or anything but research does show that Africans are the least smart from all the races. Look it up yourselves people, from test scores and IQ tests.
Posted by: Brian | Oct 19, 2007 2:17:41 PM
I looked up race and IQ and found the following interesting tidbit on Wikipedia:
"A university study in the US was carried out in order to determine whether a relationship existed between prejudice and IQ. Students were given an IQ test and a test that measures racial prejudice. The study found that students who scored lower on IQ tests were more prejudiced."
I guess it speaks for itself.
Posted by: boknows | Oct 19, 2007 3:42:49 PM
James Watson has never been a politically correct guy. In 1952, James Watson and Francis Crick basically built on research by a truly outstanding molecular biologist named Rosaland Franklin. They took her X-ray crystalography photos, and interpretations that she had already written (but not published) while a professor at Kings College. Because Dr. Franklin was a woman, Watson and Crick never saw a need to credit her at all in their Nobel Prize winning paper.
Rosalind had died of cancer after photographing and documenting DNA's double-helical structure, and thus never published on the discovery. Watson and Crick picked up her work, published a ground-breaking paper, and took all the credit. Never mentioned her once.
As for the rest of you yahoos, arguing if whites are smarter than blacks, or if evolution is even true; get a life. To even argue the point only demonstrates the sorry condition of the American intellect.
Posted by: A Mad Scientist | Oct 19, 2007 3:45:36 PM
It's a shame this man has been punished for having an opinion. He is an extremely intelligent and honorable man who has done alot for the world. Apparently political correctness is more important than ANYTHING else. Bow down to the multicultural police state or lose your job. Goodbye freedom of expression.
Posted by: Doesn't matter | Oct 19, 2007 5:32:16 PM
I just really think it is shame that we still have ignorant people out here.I'm really tired of all this racism and all these racist comments. It is very hurtful when you have to hear and read all of these negative things about your race, never do you hear the positive. Why are people always trying to bring African Americans down.The apology did not mean anything, because he meant what he said.
Posted by: stop the racism | Oct 23, 2007 11:00:01 PM
Watson made far reaching claims with no evidence by his own standards to support it other than the invalid IQ test with no cultural relevance to Africans. Africa itself has been under attack for over 2,000 years by caucasions,and asiatic hordes. No wonder its people were pushed back from the northerly areas into sub sahara. There are several great African Empires to all of you non learned. Ur, Chaldea, Egypt, Sumeria, Mali, Timbuctu, Songhai,to name a few, all of them over 600 years ago.
Posted by: Ted Williams | Oct 25, 2007 12:30:59 PM
Post a comment
