Science and Society

The Latest Developments in Science and Technology

Ned Potter is the science correspondent for ABC's "World News with Charles Gibson." He has reported on such topics as space exploration, the human genome and climate change.

September 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

« Ant-agonism | Main | The High Ambitions of Elon Musk »

Who Owns the Arctic?

August 05, 2008 5:26 PM

There is a gold rush, or something like it, in the cold wastes around the North Pole.  They're getting warmer, or at least less icy, which has countries looking to stake their claims for the oil, natural gas and minerals that may be recoverable up there.

You may recall an estimate last month that three years' worth of oil may lie undiscovered beneath the Arctic seas.  And there were also some hard feelings last year when Russia sent an expedition to the pole itself, trying to prove that it was, in fact, part of the Russian continental shelf.

Now the International Boundaries Research Unit at Durham University in England has weighed in with a new map of "Maritime jurisdiction and boundaries in the Arctic region" -- and it's bound to renew the fight.

Arctic_map_durham_080805

"The map identifies known claims and agreed boundaries, plus potential areas that might be claimed in the future," say its creators.   They invite comments and questions, presumably from interested parties -- "but please read the briefing notes carefully first."

As for the North Pole itself, look closely at the pdf version of the map HERE.  It's right on the edge of the area claimed by Russia -- but more likely, according to Durham, it's part of the continental shelf that would be claimed by Denmark.

August 5, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (15)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/433071/32065074

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Who Owns the Arctic?:

User Comments

Hey, that's a clever positive feedback. Burn oil so we can melt the ice caps and find omre oil!

Posted by: jock59801 | Aug 5, 2008 6:16:15 PM

the Arctic isn't melting. Global warming alarmists are chiseling it away with ice picks and Ohio Blue Tips in order to make it look like there's a problem so they can be funded to study a science they don't believe in. I work for Exxon and I approve this message.

Posted by: plantain11 | Aug 5, 2008 8:29:50 PM

God owns it.

Posted by: Kay | Aug 5, 2008 9:10:48 PM

Why is everyone obsessed with ownership? These caps are necessary for life on earth. If anyone claims to "own them" and then commences to destroy them because they own them, you watch how fast this so-called ownership lasts.

Posted by: RW | Aug 5, 2008 9:52:20 PM

Ownership is the biggest problem in the world today, The world is no longer a place to be honored, it is no longer a place we respect, If we dont OWN it we dont care. My ancestors had the right idea, Give back to Mother Earth, never tread harshly upon her, as long as we honored the balance of nature, we did ok, now we take and take with no thought to the balance of the planet, Mother Earth is trying to protect herself from us with every hurricane, every flood, every earthquake, we are being told we are hurting the planet in the only way the planet can tell us.

Posted by: Get Real | Aug 5, 2008 10:37:55 PM

i agree with get real.... mother earth is warning the people to wise up

Posted by: buddy | Aug 6, 2008 4:54:27 AM

I don't know who owns the place-but you can bet we'll be there soon to "Bring them Democracy".

Posted by: stillfree2speak | Aug 6, 2008 8:10:26 AM

Well, why can't it be considered international property. Something like Antarctica. That way no one can claim ownership, yet all can use it. I think that would be best, instead of bickering over who gets what part of the sea floor.

Posted by: Lawrence | Aug 6, 2008 8:40:33 AM

I agree with Lawrence that the International Community should have made the Artic claims-free, thus international property. Yet given how much oil is value today, I highly doubt Russia and other nations will honor this, thus they all seek out to claim whatever land under the Artic ASAP.

Speaking of claiming, I hate to say this but the USA better seek out to say they claim the land off Alaska or else if they wait too long, Canada and Russia will go right in to claim it. No amount of being a 'nice guy' will do the USA good in this 'Claim the Artic' game.

Posted by: GWP | Aug 6, 2008 10:12:54 AM

BTW, I just thought of something. If the land under the Artic now belongs to these nations, does this make the ocean no longer 'international waters'? Does this mean submarines and other vessels can't go through these waters? This question is important now that this is the first time there are 'land claims' to land under the oceans.

Posted by: GWP | Aug 6, 2008 10:17:46 AM

All of this for 3 years worth of oil. THREE. Well, there MAY be 3 years worth... what's the point..?

Posted by: Glow | Aug 6, 2008 12:44:48 PM

"3 years worth of oil", is a favorite refrain. Consider however that the USA makes that stretch out to say, 50% of US consumption for 6 years. Can you say, OPEC MELTDOWN? How about $9.95 per barrel oil? No, I don't think producing our way out of crisis is a long term goal. Yes, I do think it must be part of the strategy, and it must begin now!

Posted by: Eric Drexil Holland | Aug 6, 2008 2:04:23 PM

well, personally, I think that Lawrence is correct. I mean all can use it and then we don't have to worry about going into each others teritory. What's the point of bickering over something that can be easily resolved?

Posted by: Jordan | Aug 6, 2008 2:55:27 PM

Who owns the moon? What parts of Mars are our's? Who owns the sky over the Pacific? I tell you, humanity is full of barbarians, from the west to the east, north to the south. A cyclone or huricane can slam us within minutes taking with it thousands of lives. That's when mother nature tells us that SHE owns us; we don't own her. Humanity is a huge embarresment to earth.

Posted by: Urma | Aug 6, 2008 4:55:53 PM

Hey, that's a clever positive feedback. Burn oil so we can melt the ice caps and find omre oil!

Jock, you pride yourself on being "scientific". Surely, you're smart enough to know that one or two oil wells will hardly "melt the ice" in the arctic.

But here's an even better idea! Let's be even more dependent on Middle Eastern oil and have gas prices raise to $8.00 a gallon here in the US, thereby creating an even deeper recession and more poverty! That'll certainly teach those American's a lesson about "melting ice" in the Arctic.

Posted by: jfm125 | Aug 11, 2008 2:39:45 PM

Post a comment