Science and Society

The Latest Developments in Science and Technology

Ned Potter is the science correspondent for ABC's "World News with Charles Gibson." He has reported on such topics as space exploration, the human genome and climate change.

July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« Previous | Main | Next »

Campaign 2.0

September 22, 2008 1:45 PM

There's a website called Versionista, designed to keep track of websites as their owners edit them.  For political operatives looking to catch their opponents' flip-flops, it's heaven.  John McCain's website has been known to link to it, catching any shift in position on Barack Obama's site.

So HERE's Obama's site updating its stance on technology, adding the word "science," removing a section on immigration, adding mention of a few bills Obama sponsored.  See what else has changed. 

And by the way, here's McCain's page on space, lengthened in August from one paragraph.

Are these routine edits of evolving positions?  Or flip-flops?  In regular life, people frequently rework what they write.  In a campaign, their opponents are often less charitable.

September 22, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (12)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

This is grand. I've been watching sites scrub Obama's crap since last year. Glad to know somebody else saw what a shifty character he is.

Posted by: Kitty | Sep 22, 2008 2:01:52 PM

It's like the daily show, only without the video montage and wise remarks!

Posted by: Calis | Sep 22, 2008 2:05:18 PM

Come on people and have a little common sense during this election. Some change is necessary. Everyone complains about Bush not changing his mind, but then complain about McCain or Obama changes their minds. It’s problem when they act like McCain and change their mind and claim that was their opinion all of the time.

Posted by: The Unshrub | Sep 22, 2008 2:32:30 PM

do they "weight" the changes

like going from a regulation guy ...to a non regulation guy in the space of an hour...after the country loses a trillion dollars.

or going from for the war to ...we didn't go in right to it was a success...

after the country loses a trillion dollars...

or going from a regulation guy with friends flying you around in jets and vacationing with bank executives and having deregulation lobbyists as your inner circle and then flipping (temporarily) after you are put on trial and given ethics reprimands...and after...drum roll

the country loses a trillion dollars

3 times this guy is at the center of a trillion dollar national loss...

and we are even looking at him...

oh it must be because of his really incredible qualified VP...you know the one who started 10 years ago in a step aerobic class she shared with the mayor and chief of police of her town.

ugh

"sarah why did they disinvite you to the rally against Iran"

"well I can't see it from my house ya see...

there is a tree in the way"

Posted by: dl | Sep 22, 2008 2:42:47 PM

I have nothing against changing positions, in fact, I would say that it is a sign good leader who has the ability to change his position as new information come to light.

I just think that new information should be something other than popularity. . .

Posted by: Calis | Sep 22, 2008 2:45:57 PM

On the same day Lehman Brothers went bankrupt, Meryl Lynch was sold for pennies on the dollar to Bank of America. John Thain became CEO of Merrill Lynch in December. Thain's $81 million pay package made him the second highest-earning CEO in the nation this year. Bloomberg News reported that Thain could make another $11 million.

Thain is one of McCain's chief economic advisers. In less than a year the guy took down a BILLION dollars while running the company into a ditch. And McCain is complaining about golden parachutes?????

Posted by: beck | Sep 22, 2008 2:55:49 PM

KITTY...maybe you failed to see how many times McCain has shifted his views, ideas, and policies to match what is the "going" thing in order to get the votes?

Posted by: newvoter | Sep 22, 2008 2:58:58 PM

dl...they dis-invited Palin because the whole purpose of this rally was to show Hilary supporters that she supports Palin!!! Palin is a nobody with dreams of grandure.

Posted by: thoughtful | Sep 22, 2008 3:01:03 PM

wake up and smell the roses! McCain
comments about Obama's change forum, yet McCain has used it numerous times, plus his policies change to meet what some people want to hear. Palin?????? What does she know??? She doesn't know foreign policy, economy and can't seem to answer questions, she rattles on as she did with Charlie Gibson. Gibson was doing his job interviewing her, wake up people and listen to her. She couldn't answer a yes or no question, asked about foreign policy - talked about energy. At a recent town hall meeting she was asked a question, she didn't answer (or wouldn't), but she's prepared for vice presidency or presidency. WAKE UP.

Posted by: kmn | Sep 23, 2008 6:29:45 AM

I like the watch dog element to this for both the Obama and McCain camps. I'm most interested in revisionist history than the normal and expected adjusting of course as election day nears.

Funny how every blog turns into name calling. Ya'll need to get over the fact that not everyone thinks like you or agrees with with what you think is important.

Suggest you all watch the Bill Clinton clip from The View where he discusses what is important to each individual voter. Very insightful stuff from the ex-Pres.

Just vote! Many have paid the ultimate sacrifice to give you the 'right' to do so.

Posted by: Jake | Sep 23, 2008 10:04:07 AM

I sort of agree with Calis, but new information seems to escape the candidates until one gets a little press on a position, then the other sees the "wisdom" and rethinks his position. It's all a little too fluid to me. Most of their philosophy should have been in place before they threw their respective hats in the ring. Mind-changing doesn't always indicate flexibility of thought. It sometimes signals indecisiveness. Worse, it may indicate how easily they can be influenced by outsiders.

Posted by: andy | Sep 23, 2008 4:08:29 PM

How often they change their position is not the whole story. You also have to factor how quickly they change their position, their reasoning behind their change of position, and if they are being truthful about their change of position. You have to look at both candidates using the criteria in both statements and websites. This time, I am not taking any sides since I know both are guilty. Ill let the reader of this comment decide who has deserves the most blame for Flip-Flopping.

Posted by: Andrew | Sep 23, 2008 7:09:32 PM

Post a comment





 

TECHNOLOGY VIDEOS