Ned Potter is the science correspondent for ABC's "World News with Charles Gibson." He has reported on such topics as space exploration, the human genome and climate change.
RECENT POSTS
- Mars Rover: Stuck in the Mud
- Tranquility Base
- NASA's Ares 1-X Test: The View From Above
- The Yes Men
- The Missing Link -- Not
- Moon Crash Kicked Up Plume After All
- Moon Crash: Where's the Water?
- Green Apple: Firm is Latest to Leave U.S. Chamber of Commerce
- Recovery.gov: Your Tax Dollars at Work
- Climate: Power Companies Quit U.S Chamber of Commerce
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
"Lifelong Republican" EPA Chiefs Back Obama
November 03, 2008 7:08 PM
There is a man-bites-dog quality to this story: the first two administrators of the Environmental Protection Agency, both appointed by President Nixon in the 1970s, say they are voting Democratic this year.
"We are lifelong Republicans," write William Ruckelshaus and Russell Train in an opinion piece in the Tampa Tribune. "Yet after much thoughtful deliberation we have decided to support Barack Obama...." The piece is HERE.
Ruckelshaus ran the EPA when it began in 1970, and returned from 1983 to 1985 to do the job under President Reagan. (Students of political history may also recall he was one of the men in Mr. Nixon's crosshairs during the "Saturday Night Massacre" of October 20, 1973, when the president, angrily trying to fire the Watergate prosecutor Archibald Cox, couldn't find someone to do it. Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Ruckelshaus, newly-arrived as Deputy Attorney General, both refused and left their jobs.)
Train was Ruckelshaus' successor at the EPA in 1973, serving through the administration of Gerald Ford.
Now Ruckelshaus and Train write, "Senator Obama has compellingly stated his intent to re-engage the community of nations in support of policies that will begin the arduous task of realizing a clean and secure future for the planet."
They have some kind words for Sen. McCain: "As a senator, John McCain has demonstrated courage and vision on important environmental issues, most notably in his leadership in addressing climate change, a balanced approach to energy policy, and in support for the Law of the Sea."
Then this: "However in his quest for the White House he has often modified his policies to appeal to the Republican base. While this may be fortunate for his candidacy, it is unfortunate for the American people."
How about EPA chiefs from other Republican administrations? The most recent to hold the office are still in government. So let's look back a few years.
Christine Todd Whitman, the former New Jersey governor who ran the EPA in the first years of the Bush administration, has been campaigning for McCain.
William K. Reilly, who headed the EPA during the term of George H.W. Bush, is still on the board of the non-profit World Wildlife Fund, which has offered environmental advice to both candidates.
As for Democrats who ran the EPA? There's only one from the last 20 years, Carol Browner, and she's been advising the Obama camp.
November 3, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (10)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Amazing! Thanks for this information.
Posted by: Leslie | Nov 3, 2008 7:27:53 PM
Ok, now that all of the critical thinking Republicans have intelligently "abandoned ship", let the others go down in flames with McCain still at the helm yelling, "WE'VE GOT EM RIGHT WHERE WE WANT EM!"
Right, my fellow prisoners??? Errrr, anybody there???
(crickets chirping)
POTUS OBAMA - IT'S A LOCK
(Rest in Peace Grandma Toot)
Posted by: Denmark Vessey | Nov 3, 2008 7:41:45 PM
Let's win this for Toot!
Posted by: dem in chicago | Nov 3, 2008 8:07:47 PM
Great news, now maybe we can finally be more united in electing Barack Obama as our 44th president. And Toot will truly be able to rest in peace knowing her vote counted and her grandson made it to the whitehouse.
Posted by: matteroffacts | Nov 3, 2008 8:50:34 PM
*inhales deeply*
Ah, I love the smell of an untainted oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere in the morning! It's a good day to be an American!
Posted by: Yukon Sam | Nov 4, 2008 8:55:31 AM
Obama should have been with his grandmother when she died.
He didn't need to reiterate for the umpteenth time his ideas for the future. No one would have changed their vote because of it.
FYI - The rich are paying your way right now, unless you're paying your fair share of the federal budget (3 trillion / 300 million people = $10,000 for every man-woman-child).
My household with wife and 3 children would owe $50,000 just for federal taxes and we make about $100,000 a year.
If you kill the golden goose (the rich), who's going to pay your bills?
The rich, without greed, could retire tomorrow and you'd have to start paying the income taxes that were being collected on them.
Or would you go for that last ditch effort to taking the money out of their accounts directly?
Socialism only guarantees us the same poor conditions as everyone else. We've seen this before in low productivity countries with no incentives. If you're going to punish people for success, why would anyone try to do better?
With high taxation, the real cost of consumer debt creation is more than you'd think. Debt is paid off with after-tax money. A dollar borrowed will cost you about $1.30 in earnings to payoff even without interest considerations.
We find in recessions that governments go into the red because tax collections lean so heavily on the rich. When the rich aren't making much money or capital gains, public debt soars.
Posted by: Joe | Nov 4, 2008 12:11:50 PM
If you're making 100k a year, you get a tax cut. If you're clearing more than a cool quarter million a year, you'll be back to where you were before Bush instituted his "welfare for the wealthy" tax breaks... a few percentage points higher than where you are now. You're whining about chump change.
Everybody out there whose grand ambitions to be a millionaire are now off the tracks because the top two tax brackets are going up 2-3%, raise your hands. Be honest. I just want to see those hands for whom 3% is a deal breaker, offsetting all the benefits to the point that you no longer want to be filthy rich.
That's what I thought.
The people who get the most out of the social contract pay the most back. That's the way it is. Deal with it.
Socialism is when the state owns the means of production. It does not describe modest changes to the current progessive tax system.
Do you people really believe that repeating lies and distortions over and over again makes them any more true?
Posted by: Yukon Sam | Nov 4, 2008 12:27:27 PM
Better Dead than Red
Posted by: Quietman | Nov 4, 2008 3:00:01 PM
Just wait and see. You think those election promises show reality? Those empty promises, vision will collide with reality. Have you not read the Associated Press' article that was printed 19 minutes shortly after Obama was elected?
Posted by: SmileSingLaugh | Nov 5, 2008 1:15:39 AM
Promises fail because often the means of implementing them become unavailable, giving way to reality. Lies are what we tell ourselves and others to alter reality to suit our selfish needs. Which one represents the greater evil?
Posted by: David | Nov 6, 2008 12:15:30 PM
Post a comment
