Ned Potter is the science correspondent for ABC's "World News with Charles Gibson." He has reported on such topics as space exploration, the human genome and climate change.
RECENT POSTS
- Mars Rover: Stuck in the Mud
- Tranquility Base
- NASA's Ares 1-X Test: The View From Above
- The Yes Men
- The Missing Link -- Not
- Moon Crash Kicked Up Plume After All
- Moon Crash: Where's the Water?
- Green Apple: Firm is Latest to Leave U.S. Chamber of Commerce
- Recovery.gov: Your Tax Dollars at Work
- Climate: Power Companies Quit U.S Chamber of Commerce
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
National Historic Site
July 17, 2009 1:43 PM
40 years after Apollo 11 went to the moon, NASA is back with a ship called Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, or LRO -- and one of its first assignments was to look for what Apollo left behind.
Each of the Apollo Lunar Modules (there were six landings in all) left behind their descent stages, including their landing legs, main rocket engine and fuel tanks. LRO, from an altitude of about 30 miles, was able to make out the Apollo 11 descent stage as a dot -- about 20 pixels in all -- with a long shadow.
The result is this image -- not high resolution, but remember that they've picked out an object about 12 feet across, a quarter of a million miles from Earth.
LRO has also found four of the five other Apollo landing sites, and you can find the pictures HERE. Look carefully at Apollo 14 and you can make out the tracks left by a wagon on which the astronauts piled their tools and rock samples.
The astronauts' discarded equipment could conceivably remain for eons, baking and freezing as the sun rises and sets, but otherwise almost undisturbed in the vacuum of space.
July 17, 2009 in History, Space | Permalink | Share | User Comments (55)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I hope this finally wakes up the nay-sayers so they can grasp reality.
Posted by: Republic Defender | Jul 17, 2009 3:10:12 PM
I worked with a guy who said the Apollo 11 Moon landing was fake....hope he is eating crow....
Posted by: mike | Jul 17, 2009 3:50:35 PM
So there is gravity on the moon that these items just didn't float off into space?
Posted by: Jodie | Jul 17, 2009 3:56:44 PM
Yes, Jodie, there IS gravity on the Moon. IIRC, it is about 1/8th the strength of our planet's gravity.
In fact, EVERYTHING has a gravitational field, even YOU.
Cheers,
Robert~
Posted by: Robert~ | Jul 17, 2009 4:11:28 PM
Well... If they wanted to "fake" the moon landing...why would they design a lander that would leave evidence behind?...A Flag, and "moon buggy" tracks...those moon landing cover up conspiracy theorists are a strange bunch...
Posted by: 1enlightened | Jul 17, 2009 4:16:39 PM
I am not a doubter, I always wanted to be an astronaut. But--why are there not tire tracks from the lunar rovers? It would seem more obvious than the tool buggy from 14.
Posted by: j_in_neast | Jul 17, 2009 5:20:16 PM
I am 35yrs old, I do believe we went to the moon but...
If we did go, why have we not gone in so many years, we just barely and literally touched the surface?
How could those tapes have been erased? I understand it was a "Live TV Event". But seriously, you don't save the tapes for historical purposes.
Posted by: Devils_Advocate | Jul 17, 2009 5:56:57 PM
This really proves nothing If this LRO is that close (30 miles)then why can't we see more detailed pictures of the landers. We still see the same vague pictures from before.
Posted by: Trexler | Jul 17, 2009 6:13:26 PM
Note from Ned Potter--
Hello to j_in_neast. You asked a good question--why no tire tracks from the Apollo 15-17 rovers? NASA's answer is that LRO has not settled into its final lunar orbit yet, and only if the sun is very low do such subtle details stand out. They got lucky with Apollo 14. Later in LRO's mission, they say there should be higher-resolution images.
And Devils_Advocate, you raised the question about the erased tapes from the Apollo 11 EVA. It so happens I did that story three years ago, when it first turned out they were missing, and Stan LeBar, the retired engineer in charge of the design of the video camera system, was beside himself. He said they were not simply videotapes, they were data tapes with a lot more on them than video signals. That may--may--explain why someone later missed their importance, he told me. But you're quite right. It would have been nice to save those tapes for history.
Posted by: Ned Potter | Jul 17, 2009 6:21:03 PM
I love hearing from conspiracy theorists. They are a fascinating bunch of people. The 9/11 folks are the most fun to deal with. Just don't try to dissuade them. Instead just listen and enjoy. . .
Posted by: Jim | Jul 17, 2009 6:50:10 PM
FAKE!!
Posted by: Dave | Jul 17, 2009 6:55:32 PM
I am not a doubter of the landings but those photos are of a very low quality. Maybe the objects are just so small in relation to the focus area thats the best they can be.
Posted by: Not a skeptic | Jul 17, 2009 7:36:14 PM
One more note to Jodie... anything that has mass has gravity. The larger the mass, the more gravity something produces. The moon is smaller than the earth, which is why it has less gravity and the astronauts seemed to "bounce" in the videos. The moon definitely has enough mass for items such as fuel tanks to "stick" to it, but there's no atmosphere - the vacuum of space sits right up against the moon's surface. That's why items left there decades ago are still sitting in the exact same spot.
Posted by: Betsy | Jul 17, 2009 7:44:14 PM
My name is on an access panel of the LRO. Anyone else on this board get in on the "Send Your Name to the Moon" program? It wasn't too well advertised.
Posted by: The_Mick | Jul 17, 2009 8:09:30 PM
Wow! Sure is nice to know that we are borrowing $$$ from China and Saudi terrorists to take crappy photos of moon garbage.
Posted by: Tor | Jul 17, 2009 9:11:49 PM
Hey Ned. Next time try write a sentence to mention the cost of all this.
And, see if ya can get anyone at NASA to explain exactly how going back to the moon will help the everage starving human child.
Posted by: Tor | Jul 17, 2009 9:15:20 PM
Jodie, the moon's gravity is about 1/6th that of earth. The pictures are low resolution because as stated, the orbiter is still settling into its final orbit. It takes a little time for an orbiter to be positioned in a permanent orbit. Plus they're testing everything for the long term mission. Tor, all that "crappy moon garbage" made the high tech electronics we use every day possible. The need to make the systems as compact and light as possible led to the development of electronics as we know them today.
Posted by: R J | Jul 17, 2009 9:22:13 PM
The_Mick: Not only is my name on the panel, but I also carved my name into a piece of foil that was then added to the camera housing in a cleanroom!
Posted by: martian_ap | Jul 17, 2009 10:19:27 PM
To all those who question and doubt based on their own experiences: If you go out today in the deserts of southern California and north Africa you can find tracks from armored vehicles training for or fighting in WWII. Ye;s, Patton's tankers and Rommel's tankers left their marks, and even Mother Nature couldn't, or didn't, destroy them. So it is with the astronauts. Get over it, doubters, and find a new life and a new cause.
Posted by: aztec69 | Jul 17, 2009 10:41:47 PM
As with so many of the things we are led to believe as "true", there can and should be room for reasonable doubt where one's government is concerned. And do remember that not only is NASA government, they are DoD as well. I also wanted to be an astronaut when I was a kid, but you'd still have to be a kid to take everything the press spews out at face value. "News is something that someone, somewhere, does not want revealed. Everything else is advertising."
Posted by: h5mind | Jul 18, 2009 1:36:53 AM
Post a comment
