Science and Society
The Latest Developments in Science and Technology

Ned Potter is the science correspondent for ABC's "World News with Charles Gibson." He has reported on such topics as space exploration, the human genome and climate change.

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

« Previous | Main | Next »

Ice on Mars: More Than They Ever Thought

September 25, 2009 11:26 AM

Viking2

Note to self: whenever you make a cool scientific finding, try not to do it on a day when there's an even cooler finding.

Yesterday, while NASA was talking about those intriguing traces of water in the moon's soil, other parts of NASA were talking about lots more water -- lying frozen just beneath the surface on Mars.  There was coverage of it -- click HERE -- just not as much as there was of the moon. 

Last year the Phoenix Mars Lander set down near the Martian north pole, and found what was apparently ice in trenches it dug with its robot arm.  Now, say Shane Byrne of the University of Arizona and fellow researchers in a paper in SCIENCE, it appears there is a layer of frost beneath much of the Martian surface, probably coming within 40 degrees of the planet's equator.  It may be as little as ten inches beneath the surface in many places. 

Over at Wired, Alexis Madrigal raises an intriguing notion.  In 1976, the first two American ships to land on Mars, Vikings 1 and 2, reported that Mars was arid -- and as a result, NASA all but ignored the planet for a generation.

The Vikings had robot arms, but they could only dig about six inches down, enough to get a soil sample to deposit in experiments on board the spacecraft.  Madrigal says if you take Byrne et al's estimates literally, then Viking 2, which landed 48 degrees north of the equator, may have missed that buried layer of ice by 3-4 inches.

What if it had been designed to dig a little deeper?  What if they'd struck pay dirt?  How would the course of planetary exploration have been changed?

September 25, 2009 in Science, Space | Permalink | Share | User Comments (12)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Just imagine what we will learn tomorrow. I firmly believe in Manned
space flight, but the robotic missions
have, since the Apollo program, generated the most exciting findings.
The Hubble pictures, The first mars rover, Cassini, Mariner 1 & 2, Galileo,
Mars Orbiter, Asteriod landing, Hoygens,
The list goes on and on. I can't wait
for the Pluto mission to see what that
looks like. WOW...
Keep NASA's funding strong..It's part of
our national pride. We can't let the Chinese become the leaders in space exploration.

Posted by: blackie | Sep 25, 2009 2:04:25 PM

It it had been so, it would have been very different
in our exploration of Solar system. In the last 30 years, we could have done more with our ever-changing technologies if we had discovered water on Mars. But this is science. We sometimes miss an
opportunity and later find it out.

Posted by: Paperwhite | Sep 25, 2009 5:10:49 PM

It's hard to believe that _ALL_ Martian water was lost to the solar wind. Venus has been losing atmosphere to the solar wind for billions of years, it's many times closer to the sun, with no magnetic field to speak of, and its atmosphere is still 80+ times as dense as the Earth's. There's almost certainly vast underground seepage reserves of ice on Mars, and once humans establish a permanent presence and mine (pump if warm enough) the ice (water), it will be found to be plentiful. We need to go much deeper than just a few feet (inches?) below the surface.

Posted by: Daniel | Sep 26, 2009 1:11:01 PM

Just as the New World dominated European affairs in the 15th to 18th centuries, and the American West dominated U.S. affairs in the 19th century, space exploration will dominate the entire world's affairs at some point in the future. It should be a vital national interest right now - unfortunately, it oftens takes a back seat because many don't see how it can benefit us immediately. Imagine Columbus being refused funding for his first voyage (as he was) and it's easy to see how our short-sightedness in limiting funding towards space exploration now is foolish.

Posted by: Jim de Tejas | Sep 26, 2009 1:44:54 PM

Lets go to the moon first, get the space exploration details worked out and then head to Mars. Those technology drivers will keep our national economy viable for many decades to come.

Posted by: Don | Sep 26, 2009 2:05:58 PM

If we don't invest in Mars and Lunar exploration NOW, we will never do it. This is the last opportunity for the current "intelligent" life forms on earth to burst forth, barring some miracle of energy breakthrough.

Like the movie,"Dr. Strangelove, or how we learned to love the bomb," let me sing a little song:

'We'll meet again, don't know where or when, but we'll meet again someday, far away."

Good luck, and good night.

Posted by: Alan | Sep 27, 2009 2:02:57 PM

I think rather than the mantra "Follow the water" NASA needs to change it to "Follow the liquid water". If a place is found on Mars that has liquid water and has been stable for a long time(Geologic time scale here)life must be there.

Given the persistence and pervasiveness of life, I find it difficult to believe that life is nowhere to be found on Mars.

Posted by: Russ | Sep 29, 2009 7:47:26 PM

I am agree with Alan's comments. It good time to explore the Mars.

Posted by: khan | Oct 4, 2009 4:58:50 AM

AHHH, AT LAST! "MOON BEER!"

Posted by: David | Oct 6, 2009 5:21:10 PM

and then.... "MARS LITE!"

Posted by: David | Oct 6, 2009 5:22:12 PM

What an exciting time to be alive! To see the pioneering advances at the very beginning of humanity's steps beyond our home world, really moves me. Reminds me of a quote I once heard, and I can't remember who it's attributed to, "The Earth is a cradle and man just a child, but a child cannot remain in the cradle forever."

Posted by: Seth Maki | Oct 29, 2009 11:15:20 AM

Is there any ideas about life on Mars?

Posted by: Enlargement Herbs | Nov 11, 2009 3:55:48 PM

Post a comment





 

TECHNOLOGY VIDEOS