BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Hastert: No. 1 Recipient of Abramoff Money
May 24, 2006 6:22 PM
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, House Speaker Dennis Hastert is the No.1 individual recipient of money from Abramoff and his clients, with a total of $68,300 contributed to his campaign committee and leadership PAC from 1998 to 2004.
Click here to see the list of "Jack Abramoff and his Clients: Campaign Contribution Recipients."
On the day Abramoff was indicted, Hastert denied any unlawful connection and said he would donate to charity any campaign contributions he had received from Abramoff and his clients.
May 24, 2006 in Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert | Permalink | User Comments (28)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I'm sick and tired of the Right's pius attitudes about their crooked law makers. If any Democrat is involved in breaking the law, they too should be subjected to the same fate.
Where is the outrage they exhibited when Clinton was caught lying? Where is your disgust for dozens & dozens of examples of this idiot president,wiping his feet on our Constitution?
Posted by: Pat | May 25, 2006 3:23:53 PM
Again, great job of reporting, Brian! I used the link to view the amounts of the contributions Abramoff made to his "clients," and I felt as if I were looking at a price list for "the best legislators money can buy." This speaks volumes as to what politicians' values are today!
Posted by: chuck | May 25, 2006 3:30:17 PM
The law is no different for anyone and because you hold a political position that represents power this should not exemplify a reason to conduct yourself any differently.
It’s a pity this is what we have regardless of the political parties involved in this article. We are human’s and we all make mistakes but, these were the decisions they made and clearly new was wrong and now have to pay the price for those choices. Their sworn oath is to uphold the law, not abolish it so all of these wrongs would make a right, possible in hopes the law would be changed for them, and no penalty would be render.
Thank you ABC and Brian representing the media mainstream as it should be, honest and to the point, not allowing your editorial pieces to be dictated too, controlled by any political party or other means of power. You provide clear, precise, and accurate information which is exactly what the world should receive, therefore, I will stay in tune for your future commentaries regarding this subject and all transcribes reported.
God Bless
Posted by: Victoria Rum | May 25, 2006 6:10:43 PM
This does not look good:
House Speaker Dennis Hastert is the No.1 individual recipient of money from Abramoff and his clients, with a total of $68,300 contributed to his campaign committee and leadership PAC from 1998 to 2004.
Posted by: VAL | May 25, 2006 9:09:20 PM
Hopefully, the GOP will return to being a party for true conservatives... not corporate-fascists.
Even Ed Rollins thinks it is time for Bush to go.
Posted by: Independent Voter | May 27, 2006 7:20:36 AM
Hastert is my congressman and I will use the phrase he used about giving the government the right to listen and track my phone, e-mail and Internet traffic, if your not guilty why should you need the constitution to protect you. What is he hiding?
Where are the conservative values we have been voting for the last six years?
Disappointed Conservative
Posted by: Landrew | May 28, 2006 10:48:40 AM
I hope it's about time for there to be a follow-up to this article.
Posted by: ~Chip :) | Jul 26, 2006 1:09:02 AM
"It's not because of fate, it's because of Tequila" That may be the best thing I have ever read in my whole life!
Posted by: Aldo Shoesy | Jul 9, 2007 2:44:58 PM
Post a comment
