BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Supreme Court Delays Ruling on Reporters
Email
Print
ShareMay 30, 2006 1:01 PM
With settlement talks in their final stages, the Supreme Court today again delayed ruling in a case involving four prominent reporters, confidential sources and nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee.
The reporters have refused to divulge their sources to Lee, who is suing the Department of Justice for disclosing information about an espionage investigation of him.
Negotiations have been underway for more than two weeks involving Lee, the government and the reporters' news media companies.
The reporters include Pierre Thomas of ABC News, who worked at CNN at the time he filed his stories on Lee.
Lee was never charged with espionage and alleges the government violated his privacy rights by giving information to reporters about the case.
May 30, 2006 in Wen Ho Lee | Permalink | User Comments (2)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Of course, with the holiday Monday, the court has to wait until their "peeps" at 1600 Penn. Ave. get back to work and advise the court on how to proceed. Any questions?
Posted by: frodaddy | May 30, 2006 5:41:13 PM
As usual, the media consider themselves exempt from the laws that you and I have to obey. If we were given a subpoena to produce information we would have to comply, but the media want to be exempt.
Posted by: Sam J | Jun 5, 2006 12:33:17 PM
Post a comment
