« Previous | Main | Next »

Bring It On!

June 28, 2006 1:00 PM

Nm_skyline_060601_nr_1New York City says it can withstand seas of 31 feet, protect residents from winds of more than 100 miles per hour and guarantee the safe evacuation of up to three million without any outside help.

The hurricane plan, revised after the old plan weathered post-Katrina criticism, was unveiled today at New York's City Hall.

"We're not going to leave anyone behind," said Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

New York City's plan would require 605,000 gallons of water, 38,205 gallons of milk and 100 tons of potatoes a day to provide a single meal for the 605,328 residents who would require shelter. Altogether 3,044,821 million residents would be forced to evacuate their homes in a situation that could cause massive loss of life.

The New York Times reported in 2005 that across the nation city plans for relocation and housing were "embryonic at best and nonexistent at worst."  They predicted that "in many places highways would clog quickly, confusion would reign and police resources would soon be overtaxed."

Los Angeles and San Francisco both face major evacuation problems should an earthquake or other disaster strike.

Florida, which has a large reservoir of past experience in evacuating as many as a million people, has the advantage of repeatedly testing its plans with substantial success.

The new New York plan is sure to be examined in California and Florida and compared with plans developed there.

Because of New York City's geography, 65 evacuation centers are required to get the residents out in an orderly fashion across eight major bridges and through four tunnels. Each centers is the hub of a "solar system" of five to ten of the 505 shelters that would be activated in a worst case.

"It's extremely unlikely such a massive evacuation will ever happen," Bloomberg said.

Four of New York City's five boroughs - Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island - sit atop three islands in an archipelago. The Bronx is a coastal piece of the mainland United States.

As a result, the largest city in the United States has a long coastline open to damage from a storm surge of up to 15 feet. A storm surge is water pushed ashore by the swirling winds of a hurricane. It is the facet of a coastal storm that can cause severe flooding and holds the potential for the greatest loss of life.

June 28, 2006 | Permalink | User Comments (4)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Okay, so NYC says it can do all this, good deal. Someone make sure that statement is documented in a secure archive somewhere. If a tropical storm does hit New York and causes a mass evacuation, I don't want to see FEMA or any other sort of federal aid sent to the city to help out. I live in South Dakota and when we get blizzards that pile snow 6 feet high outside my door, we don't sit here waiting for the government to come help us out. We simply grab a book, a blanket, and light the fire place and wait a day or two until we can shovel our way out. During the summer when a tornado can very easily destroy a small town, people don't stand around a complain to the government to help them out. Fellow South Dakotans simply raise money to help the victims out and they eventually move on to start a life somewhere else. I'm just curious as to why NYC being prepared is such a big deal when the states of South Dakota, North Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, and Nebraska have been putting up with worse weather more often. I know some of you are going to argue flooding. Well, its not my fault that people built cities below sea level. Big deal if NYC says "Bring it on." So what if it has an evacuation plan. I hope the federal government can see their "confidence" in this plan hopefully will ignore their pleas for assistance when the storm hits. As for now, I'm positive the next time I get snow seven feet high that I won't have FEMA on the phone and be waiting for them to come to my rescue bringing food and shelter. My prediction, though, is inevitable. The storm will hit and NYC will begin whining like every other coastal city has when a natural disaster strikes. Us Midwesterners are proud and don't like receiving hand outs. Maybe everyone else can learn from that.

Posted by: Grant Thompson | Jun 28, 2006 1:27:59 PM

There they go dreaming again. If a major hurricane and flood hit New York City many people would refuse to evacuate. It's impossible to commute daily to the City without traffic snarls and back-ups on a normal day. Can you imagine the mayhem, looting, riots, killing, rapes caused by thousands of lawless people. Those that choose to stay and not evacuate, will control and have the run of the city. So many gifts.

Posted by: Dr. Vinny Boom-Botz | Jun 28, 2006 3:45:52 PM

I DISAGREE WITH THOMPSON, I have lived in Florida for 20 years. Try being without power for three weeks in the summer heat in FLA.I think a snow storm can't compare to a hurricane and as for tornado's; TRY HAVING BOTH TOGETHER AT THE SAME TIME!! IT causes MASSSS destruction..believe it, we didn't wait for FEMA to come help us, but when they came we needed the help!

so lets talk about who gets the worse of the storms..Florida as been hit with 4 bad storms within a 6 month period. Don't tell me your lil snow storms are really bad,and you don't need gov't help.. BACK OFF of NYU atleast they are trying to protect the people..I think they did a damn good job with 911.They have everyright to say bring it on!!

Posted by: Ashley | Jun 28, 2006 8:40:33 PM

In response to Ashley...

You're only helping me prove my point even more. You yourself are saying it, quote "I think they did a damn good job with 911.They have everyright to say bring it on!!" And I would rather take 3 days in the heat in Florida than 3 days of a frozen gas line during a winter storm here. If you're so confident in your statement then lets review. Fact: Of all 50 states in the U.S., South Dakota has the biggest range in temperature throughout the year. No other state has a larger gap between its two most extreme temperatures. Also, when its 90 degrees here with 90% humidity, its a completely different type of hot. You sweat but can't cool off because the air is already saturated enough that the sweat will not evaporate off of your skin.

I don't doubt that there was mass destruction. But when forms of natural disasters other than hurricanes happen around the U.S., they get ignored. It seems as if you and the government don't believe that the victims up here could also use the help. This is what bothers me. We get ignored and people have to resort to help from other people around the state.

And everyone else wonders why we get along so well with each other... Well, we almost all of us have something in common, we get ignored by the government. Maybe next time think about that before you open your mouth.

P.S. Wasn't that FEMA money spent on sexual favors, football tickets, etc.???

Posted by: Grant Thompson | Jun 29, 2006 11:05:01 AM

Post a comment