« Previous | Main | Next »

FDA Sued over Secret Hearing on Artificial Blood Product

July 13, 2006 5:36 PM

Hemopure_nr_1The consumer group Public Citizen has filed an emergency lawsuit to stop the FDA from holding a closed door meeting on an artificial blood substitute called Hemopure.

The FDA is scheduled to meet tomorrow to weigh whether to allow Biopure, the maker of Hemopure, and the U.S. Navy to conduct a clinical trial on emergency trauma patients without their consent.  Public Citizen's lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last night, asks for an immediate order to either stop the closed-door meeting or to open it to the public.

The FDA has said it closed the hearing to protect confidential company information.  But according to its lawsuit, Public Citizen says it was informed by Biopure that "little if any of the information" discussed would involve trade secrets.   

According to Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of Public Citizen's Health Research Group, "The public has a right to know what happens at this meeting, and I should have a right to attend and to participate in the discussion concerning the testing of this product." 

The FDA had rejected previous proposals to allow non-consent trials with Hemopure after earlier studies showed higher rates of heart problems among Hemopure patients.  Biopure says its product is safe.

The FDA's meeting comes at the same time another blood substitute product, Polyheme, is being tested in about 20 cities across the country without the consent of test subjects.  Safety concerns have also been raised about Polyheme after it was revealed 10 out of 81 patients from an earlier trial suffered heart attacks; two of those patients died. 

The maker of Polyheme, Northfield Labs, has attributed those results to a flawed trial design where doctors gave too much fluid to the Polyheme patients. Northfield also says an independent monitoring committee has periodically examined safety data from the current trauma trial and has allowed it to proceed.

Denver is out of the Polyheme trial.  See an updated list of those cities now participating in the trial.

As of Thursday afternoon...

The FDA has called off a controversial closed-door hearing set for tomorrow on whether to allow an experimental artificial blood product, Hemopure, to be tested on trauma patients without their consent. 

The action comes after the consumer group Public Citizen sued the FDA in an attempt to either stop the meeting from taking place or to open it to the public.   

An FDA spokesperson said the Hemopure meeting will be rescheduled at a later date as an open hearing.

July 13, 2006 | Permalink | User Comments (6)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Denver has finished recruiting in the phase 3 clinical trial and the entire trial will be fully enrolled shortly .

Posted by: Chris | Jul 13, 2006 9:59:31 PM

What happened to the small government conservatives? I don't mean the folks that this administration has polluted Washington with. I would think that real conservatives would have a problem with an administration who wants to keep everything secret.

Posted by: W.D.Russell | Jul 14, 2006 7:25:38 AM

Giving patients non blood products without consent is wrong!! There are many people who refuse blood and request "fillers" and those are the ones who should be in the trial. I'm amazed this trial has been allowed. It really makes a person wonder what other trials are being conducted without patients knowledge. The nonchalant attitude of the physician involved in the study was unbelieveable.

Posted by: Lynn | Jul 14, 2006 8:33:00 AM

Thank you for posting the list of partipating locations. I have a procedure coming up and am relieved to see our facility is not participating in the ongoing trials.

Posted by: shelenn | Jul 14, 2006 10:12:22 AM

Where is or What is the "Value Add" for the non-consent part of this trial? What cross section of patients can you glean from this non consent trial that would not already be available with a consent? Trauma patients and their immediate family / guardians are already in a state of high emotions. If the COD is found to be the artificial blood, how or what do you tell the surviving family? or is that the whole argument that no one need know this was the COD with the non consent? Something smells bad here and I think its accountability..........

Posted by: dreek | Jul 19, 2006 12:40:16 PM

Thanks for this good post.....

Posted by: Fda Pharmaceutical | May 16, 2009 8:54:49 AM

Post a comment