BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
New Audit Says Border Inspectors Not Given Enough Resources
July 25, 2006 10:10 AM
U.S. border inspectors are spending too much time looking at false positives on individuals who may share the name or a similar name to suspected terrorists, and they lack the resources to do other tasks, according to an internal audit by the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General's office.
The audit, to be released today, looks at problems in how the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency handles its traditional law enforcement responsibilities along with its increased efforts to intercept potential terrorists at airports and other ports of entry.
"CBP officers told us on numerous occasions that repeat matches on subsequent trips of individuals previously not determined to be the individual in [the terrorism screening database] was an extremely inefficient use of their time," says the IG report.
"Traditional missions such as narcotics interdiction and identification of fraudulent immigration documents have been adversely affected," the review finds.
The report notes that some CBP officers do not have the proper security clearances to participate in interviews or view necessary information of certain watch-listed individuals that they may encounter.
"CBP procedures are highly prescriptive and withhold from supervisors the authority to make timely and informed decisions regarding the admissibility of individuals who they could quickly confirm are not the suspected terrorists," the review noted.
The report notes that this and other restrictions in data and reporting of that data is hindering CBP from developing useful intelligence assessments.
"CBP works continually to ensure that legitimate persons – the vast majority of travelers – are not unnecessarily delayed while diligently working to ensure we scrutinize everyone of concern," said CBP spokesman Bill Anthony in response to the review.
Last year Customs officers denied entry of 16,425 criminal aliens attempting to enter the U.S. at air, land and sea ports, and intercepted over 75,000 fraudulent documents last year, according to Anthony.
"CBP is pleased that the Inspector General's report acknowledges improvements CBP has made and continues to make as CBP continues its work with other law enforcement entities, including the FBI and ICE, as part of our anti-terrorism role," Anthony said.
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Ranking Member Joe Lieberman (D-CT) said in a statement, "The DHS Inspector General's latest report tells us that CBP has failed to provide its workers with the support they need to stop suspected terrorists from crossing our ports of entry. CBP supervisors lack the authority to make swift and informed decisions about foreign nationals while others lack the security clearances needed to review information about individuals on terrorist watch lists."
July 25, 2006 in Homeland Security | Permalink | User Comments (4)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Could anything be more stupid and innane than The Blotter? As the Israeli-Hezbollah confrontation rages on these idiots post about everything but. ABC at its most useless. The MSM at its most useless.
But, there is a consolation. ABC would probably take the Hezbollah side if they dared address it.
Posted by: penny | Jul 25, 2006 5:44:28 PM
This is the investigative unit website. Israel and Hezbollah would be international news, not investigative. Everyone knows Israel is attacking Lebanon.
Posted by: Hello | Jul 25, 2006 10:36:20 PM
I, for one, am pleased that the news media is not totally absorbed in the latest flare-up of violence in the middle east. there is still other news worthy of reporting, like this item.
the Bush administration would like nothing better than for all of us to turn our attention away from their failures at every available opportunity.
Posted by: fb | Jul 26, 2006 12:17:33 PM
News is News. Makes no difference what the topic or subject. It should be viewed and commented on by all who wish to do so regardless of the venue.
As for the statement of "pleased that the news media is not totally absorbed in the latest flare-up of violence in the middle east", they are very interested - it is you who are not, but you should be.
What happens anywhere in the world can now affect us here at home in more ways than one.
Don't be ignorant to history in the making or foolish enough to believe everything you see, hear or read.
This is investigation news, but can anyone honestly say that world events do not belong in this form?
I think not.
Posted by: Anonymous | Jul 26, 2006 3:45:35 PM
Post a comment
