BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
New Bill Protects Dirty U.S. Companies, Say Critics
July 24, 2006 9:46 AM
Critics of a new bill say it fails to hold American companies accountable for knowingly participating in illegal activities, such as cigarette smuggling, which could eventually fund terrorist activities.
The 'Prevention of Civil RICO Abuse Act of 2006,' prohibits foreign governments from suing an American company in U.S. courts under the Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) law.
The U.S. House Judiciary Committee passed the bill last week.
The legislation has sparked a good deal of controversy.
"It's basically shutting down RICO as a way for foreign countries to get any relief against a U.S.-based entity, whether it's a criminal organization, a corporation or a person," said Eric Lindblom, Assistant General Counsel at the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.
Lindblom added that the bill not only protects American companies, but indirectly promotes terrorism by abetting cigarette smuggling.
"The worst way that cigarette smuggling affects all our lives is that it is being used as a significant funding source for terrorist organizations," said Lindblom. "If you finance terrorist organizations, that makes them better able to perform terrorist acts that could harm people in the U.S. and people overseas."
Previously, foreign governments were able to challenge American companies in U.S. courts, seeking damages for monies lost to illegal trafficking and smuggling of goods. And that they did. Since 2000, 30 foreign governments have filed civil RICO suits seeking compensation for revenue lost on account of smuggled goods.
Proponents of the bill say the original RICO statue allowed foreign governments to file frivolous lawsuits against American companies, seeking billions in lost revenue.
Some questioned whether those settlements were really going back to the various countries' governments, particularly when a country has a reputation for corruption.
"If not addressed, these lawsuits may allow drug cartels and paramilitary groups to reap the benefits of an unintended ambiguity in the law and turn RICO into a funding source," said Rep. Sensenbrenner (R-WI) in a hearing last week.
The bill, which passed in the Judiciary Committee by a vote of 17 to eight, is now up for consideration by the full House of Representatives.
July 24, 2006 | Permalink | User Comments (1)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
".....particularly when a country has a reputation for corruption."
That's a sham argument. Two wrongs don't make a right. If a company is corrupt, that company should get nailed. Doesn't matter if it's US, Chinese, Malaysian or Zimbabwean. Corrupt is corrupt, it doesn't matter what flag they're flying.
Posted by: BB | Jul 26, 2006 1:33:00 AM
Post a comment
