« Previous | Main | Next »

Women Face Tough Odds in Pakistan

August 28, 2006 1:40 PM

Female_nurse_pakistan_nrConservative Muslim clerics made it clear this week that they do not want female aid workers helping those still in refugee camps after a massive earthquake last year left more than 73,000 dead.  The clerics warned that if aid agencies continue to employ female workers, they will organize violent protests and cause damage to local property.

Syed Atta Ullah Shah, the prayer leader of the central mosque in Bagh in northern Pakistan, said local residents were outraged by the employment of the female aid workers and called the aid agencies' behavior "obscene," alleging they "hire beautiful girls and take them to Islamabad for their enjoyment." 

"There will be demonstrations and damage may be caused to public property and a law and order situation would be created in the area," he threatened.

Meanwhile, in the northwest Bajaur District, an extremist Islamic group has distributed "night letters" banning women from working and girls from attending school.  The letters also warn all aid groups to leave the area immediately or risk a violent backlash.

Night letters are a common tactic of the Taliban in neighboring Afghanistan.  The Taliban, prior the U.S. invasion in 2001, had created a radical Islamic state in Afghanistan, in which they had forbade women from attending school, working and receiving health care. 

Recently, the Taliban has made a comeback in the mountainous regions of Afghanistan, where they repeatedly come into conflict with the Afghan army and U.S. and coalition soldiers.

August 28, 2006 | Permalink | User Comments (38)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Muslim clerics border more and more on the ridiculous.

Posted by: Jim | Aug 28, 2006 3:15:57 PM

I guess that they forget that they once had a woman as president (where even the democratic West hasn't been that equal). It's sad that they continue with generations of ignorance and practices that DO NOT follow Islam or the Quran!

Posted by: JB | Aug 28, 2006 3:43:32 PM

If they are so ungrateful as to throw the women aid workers out of their country, stop sending them aid altogether - see how they like that. If they are so highhanded, they don't deserve our money; let them starve, see how they like that.

Posted by: alioth | Aug 28, 2006 3:50:04 PM

If they don't want help, then fine. Pull them out. Every single one.

If you want help from other nations, don't whine about how they provide it. I believe that's called "looking a gift horse in the mouth".

Posted by: Anonymous | Aug 28, 2006 4:12:53 PM

what a bunch of ingrates.

Posted by: Mike jones | Aug 28, 2006 4:24:31 PM

The most challenging thing about these clerics' letters is that they do not reflect the wants and needs of the people whom the aid workers are helping. Leaving the people of Pakistan without aid would be a severe punishment simply for being born in the same country as a few crazed mad-men with the ability to make a lot of noise.

Posted by: Anon | Aug 28, 2006 5:06:23 PM

Hey JB, The democratic west has had female leaders;

1. Prime Minister Golda Meir

2. Prime Minister Margerent Thathcher

3. The current Chancellor of Germany

But getting back to the main point of female aid workers, its Pakistan call. This may be an indication of a home grown Pakistani Taliban movement. One more indicator that Pakistan is a seriously divided nation, maybe just like Iraq, Pakistan may be on the verge of their own civil war.

Posted by: Steven Marler | Aug 28, 2006 5:06:29 PM

Its not surprising that an ignorant priest said something ignorant. But that does not mean the government or the country actually banned it.

ABC should have more honest unbiased media reporting than making inaccurate statements like "Pakistan" Bans Female Aid Workers

Posted by: MA | Aug 28, 2006 5:09:38 PM

utter ignorance!!what a shame on these so called muslim clerks. they are keeping 52%of their socity locked up.
they don,t use their brains to reflect on real islamic teachings.

Posted by: mohammad ilyas | Aug 28, 2006 5:33:12 PM

99% of the people there do not agree with these extremist positions. But this 1% always gets the journalist ' ear and is hown in news every where which gives the impression that all are agreeing with them. This encourages these people too, so the next time they come up with even more outrageous things just to get prominence in media.

Posted by: ali | Aug 28, 2006 5:41:29 PM

99% of the people there do not agree with these extremist positions. But this 1% always gets the journalist ' ear and is shown in news every where which gives the impression that the rest of the people are agreeing with them. This encourages these people too, so the next time they come up with even more outrageous things just to get prominence in media.

Posted by: ali | Aug 28, 2006 5:43:12 PM

More threats and nonsense from the so called religion of peace.

Posted by: ML | Aug 28, 2006 5:53:10 PM

THOSE MORONS...DIDNT THEY HAVE MOTHERS?OR WERE THEY HATCHED? DONT SEND ANYTHING TO THEM, I GUESS THEY ARE STILL LIVING IN THE STONE AGE,LET THEM MOVE IN WITH BIN LADIN.

JOHANN DOHMANN,USA

Posted by: JOHANN DOHMANN | Aug 28, 2006 6:06:01 PM

This should, more than anything else,illustrate to the decent, honest Muslim people of the region that their "religious leaders" usually do not have their best interests at heart.

Posted by: Jami | Aug 28, 2006 6:06:20 PM

THT REALLY MAKES ME MAD!

Posted by: brianna | Aug 28, 2006 7:04:31 PM

We need to stop all aid get on every media network in the world and explain how the Religious Leaders did not want our help. Play their games and do not give in. Wait never mind the media would spin it and make us look bad.

Posted by: BB | Aug 28, 2006 9:12:29 PM

Religious leaders who constantly incite violence are not religious or leaders.

Posted by: Dinos | Aug 28, 2006 9:44:43 PM

Such views about women are by and large secular tribal views fully endorsed by the feudal lords for their own benefit. They have historically as they do today skew religion as a means of exerting control over their people much like Jones Town, and the Branch Davidians of Waco, TX. and Bhagwan Rajneesh (his version of Hinduism – a form of meditation which involved nudity, sex and dope-smoking – and he did cash in on the hippy dollar of the 70’s).

ABC is fanning the fire of Islamophobia by not fully explaining that such views are held by a certain groups – zealots who in the name of religion perpetrate all sorts of atrocities. The fact is these zealots by and large are the product of US endorsed and funded (to defeat USSR’s expansionist desires) Taliban or Jihadists movement! The fact is the vast majority of the Muslims do not hold such extremist views. The fact is that long before any women in the emancipated West held a high political office – Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka had female heads-of-state. In fact, Sirimavo Bandaranaike of Sri Lanka was first woman in the world to serve as a nation's prime minister. Such powerful leaders – all women in the part of the world much maligned by the western media for women’s rights - how can that be possible? Let’s keep it in perspective please.

Posted by: Riz Haider, USA | Aug 28, 2006 10:25:04 PM

While having respect for the individual to follow whatever religeon they wish, I do question the the personal discipline of such Muslim clerics/men. Having said that, we must remember that liberation of women in the West still has a long way to go before we are free from the 'eve' mentality of some fundamental Christians, and it's not that long ago that christian were burning 'witches.'

Posted by: Maureen Ann | Aug 28, 2006 10:36:20 PM

The dispute was over alcohol and shorts that the women were wearing.It has now been resolved and foreign aid women are being allowed to continue their work.This ABC News team is not upto task.

Posted by: Aamir Ali | Aug 28, 2006 10:51:35 PM

Post a comment