« Previous | Main | Next »

Exclusive: The Sexually Explicit Internet Messages That Led to Fla. Rep. Foley's Resignation

September 29, 2006 5:59 PM

Mark_foley_email3_nrFlorida Rep. Mark Foley's resignation came just hours after ABC News questioned the congressman about a series of sexually explicit instant messages involving congressional pages, high school students who are under 18 years of age.

In Congress, Rep. Foley (R-FL) was part of the Republican leadership and the chairman of the House caucus on missing and exploited children.

He crusaded for tough laws against those who used the Internet for sexual exploitation of children.

"They're sick people; they need mental health counseling," Foley said.

But, according to several former congressional pages, the congressman used the Internet to engage in sexually explicit exchanges. 

They say he used the screen name Maf54 on these messages provided to ABC News.

Maf54: You in your boxers, too?
Teen:   Nope, just got home. I had a college interview that went late.
Maf54: Well, strip down and get relaxed.

Another message:

Maf54: What ya wearing?
Teen:  tshirt and shorts
Maf54: Love to slip them off of you.

And this one:

Maf54: Do I make you a little horny?
Teen:   A little.
Maf54: Cool.

The language gets much more graphic, too graphic to be broadcast, and at one point the congressman appears to be describing Internet sex.

Federal authorities say such messages could result in Foley's prosecution, under some of the same laws he helped to enact.

"Adds up to soliciting underage children for sex," said Brad Garrett, a former FBI agent and now an ABC News consultant.  "And what it amounts to is serious both state and federal violations that could potentially get you a number of years."

Foley's resignation letter was submitted late this afternoon, and he left Capitol Hill without speaking to reporters.

In a statement, he said he was "deeply sorry" and apologized for letting down his family and the people of Florida.

But he made no mention of the Internet messages or the pages. 

One former page tells ABC News that his class was warned about Foley by people involved in the program.

Other pages told ABC News they were hesitant to report Foley because of his power in Congress.

This all came to a head in the last 24 hours. Yesterday, we asked the congressman about some much tamer e-mails from one page, and he said he was just being overly friendly. After we posted that story online, we began to hear from a number of other pages who sent these much more explicit, instant messages. When the congressman realized we had them, he resigned.

Click here to read an exclusive 2003 Internet exchange between Congressman Foley and a former congressional page, according to the young man.  Warning: sexually explicit language, reader discretion advised. 

Click here to read more Internet exchanges between Foley and former congressional pages.

September 29, 2006 in Mark Foley Internet Scandal | Permalink | User Comments (652)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Well, this pretty much establishes the kids were minors, making this a criminal issue. Certainly is a tragedy, for those Foley victimized. This guys gonna burn, and deservedly so. Plus, he wasn't even that smooth.

Posted by: Matt Burnett | Sep 29, 2006 6:11:55 PM

C'mon Repubs...let's see a defense!

"Uh, Clinton was worse"?

LOL...you guys define hypocrisy

Posted by: gee | Sep 29, 2006 6:18:33 PM

Another example that those who scream the loudest about something are probably the worst violators behind the scenes!

Posted by: Jason Carson | Sep 29, 2006 6:19:31 PM

Wonder if he'll get some mental health counceling? What a piece of scum of the worst kind. Preying on children is the lowest.

Posted by: sandy | Sep 29, 2006 6:20:47 PM

Another bit of upstanding behavior from the "Party of Family Values."

Posted by: tony | Sep 29, 2006 6:24:01 PM

Our worlds just excactly like what the Bible says it is-

Jer. 17:9 says that

The heart is deceitful above all things, And desperately wicked;
Who can know it?

Posted by: Richard Forinash | Sep 29, 2006 6:25:23 PM

Umm. I do not see anyone defending this guy.

Posted by: Den | Sep 29, 2006 6:25:51 PM

Please do not make this a political thing. That he's Republican has nothing to do with the crime he committed. Let's keep the focus on that, not on your politics. The fact that you'd use something like this as a weapon to stump for your party is pretty insensitive and sick. You're giving liberals (like myself) a bad name.

Posted by: Matt Burnett | Sep 29, 2006 6:25:58 PM

Well, they DO say in politics that the best way to lose an election is to be found in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy...
But the angle that he wrote the laws that he violated just astounds me. It just goes to show, yet again, that anything that a fiction writer can cook up will always be bettered by real life.

Posted by: Pat Payne | Sep 29, 2006 6:26:27 PM

give me a break matt. Get off your stump and get real this could be anyone. Sexual pedophilia is not limited to a political party base. Lets get of the rhetoric and get the guy behind bars. That is what matters.

Posted by: Brandon | Sep 29, 2006 6:26:42 PM

it has nothing to do with him being a democrat or a republican either way he is a sick man that clearly made sexual comments towards a minor. I am tired of hearing that the Democrats "conspired" to bring this up so close mid term elections. The fact is that it was brought up and that he needs to face the consequences.

Posted by: Carlos Gutierrez | Sep 29, 2006 6:26:52 PM

I think it's more of a travesty that a man can become a state representative while still mistaking "you're" and "your"

Posted by: Rob | Sep 29, 2006 6:27:27 PM

Stop turning this into a political debate. It had nothing to do with his affiliation, just the fact that he was a sick man in power. Now he's removed, and hopefully he will be prosecuted. Get a life.

Posted by: Tom | Sep 29, 2006 6:27:55 PM

sad thing is, if he were a female high school teacher doing this, it would be a misdemeanor, especially if he claimed he was Bi-polar, which he probably will at some point

Posted by: NMH | Sep 29, 2006 6:27:57 PM

This isn't a dem/rep thing. It's a sick, twisted, criminal human thing. I can't think of one republican who won't be delighted to see this guy go down, and deservedly so.

Posted by: bjs | Sep 29, 2006 6:28:13 PM

Priceless...I hope they punish him to the fullest extent of the strict laws he worked so diligently to pass.

Posted by: J | Sep 29, 2006 6:28:33 PM

let's bring down all the pompous creeps in government who preach one thing and do another; all of them, from president cheney, w the wonder dog, and the rest of the self-righteous draft-dodgers who feel comfortable telling men to go and die when they were unwilling to do it during the vietnam war.

Posted by: dan | Sep 29, 2006 6:28:35 PM

Ha. This makes the user comments on the original article pretty laughable. This isn't a Democrat vs. Republican issue people, and it's definitely not liberal propaganda. Both parties need a lesson in accountability. Let's quit pointing fingers and work together to keep criminals out of Washington.

hypocrite
1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings

Posted by: Lori | Sep 29, 2006 6:29:42 PM

I wonder why it boils down to a Democrat/Republican thing with everyone as if it means every other one is involved. Because he's a hypocrite? That's every one of them, guys.

Posted by: Lyfe | Sep 29, 2006 6:29:46 PM

It's not about which party can be more disgusting. This is a non-partisan issue.

I mean, the sex offender registry doesn't list political affiliation on it, does it?

But really... What's a pederast, Walter?

Posted by: Non Partisan | Sep 29, 2006 6:30:39 PM

Post a comment