BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Half Ton of Bomb Material Stored a Few Miles from the White House
September 08, 2006 12:18 PM
With virtually no questions asked, an undercover ABC News team was able to purchase a half ton of one of the world's most dangerous bomb-making materials and move it into a storage shed only a few miles from the White House and the U.S. Capitol.
Despite its use in the bombing of the Oklahoma City Federal Building, there are still no federal laws restricting the purchase of ammonium nitrate, a chemical fertilizer, widely sold at farm supply stores.
The ABC News undercover team made the purchases, in cash, at farm supply stores in North Carolina and Virginia and were never once asked for any valid ID.
Legislation requiring buyers of ammonium nitrate to be registered by the federal government have been blocked by the agricultural industry, according to the Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Congressman Pete King (R-NY).
The results of the ABC News investigation are "a wake-up call that the American people and the Congress needs," King said. A law requiring sellers to record purchases has passed King's committee and is awaiting a vote by the full House.
Brian Ross' full investigative report will air Monday on World News with Charles Gibson and as part of an ABC News Special Report on the fifth anniversary of 9/11. (10pm EST/9pm Central)
September 8, 2006 | Permalink | User Comments (231)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
.........and children under 18 years of age aren't supposed to be able to purchase cigarettes, or those under 21 can't drink or buy alcohol........
Come on Brian, isn't there enough legitimate news to cover without going into cloak and dagger modes.....
Give me a break.......
Posted by: dreek | Sep 8, 2006 12:43:38 PM
September 8, 2006
Bomb making material!!! Guess who is paying for it....YOUR TAX DOLLARS.....
See federal case in Federal Court House in New Orleans, LA closed section......LOVOI vs. ALITALIA AIRLINES, et al.......after 9/11 an Executive Order was put out by President George W. Bush who said "we will not do business with terrorist and those who do business with terrorist countries." Has he stuck by his order and the funny part.......federal judges don't care what he said either........It is YOUR TAX DOLLARS that are paying for the terrorist and their weapons, etc. through FEDERAL GRANT MONEY....THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL CONTRACT COMPLAINCE PROGRAMS who oversees these issues is failing their jobs and so is HOMELAND SECURITY........Domestic and International air carriers either passenger or cargo receive federal grants from the U. S. GOvernment. THey travel to terrorist countries everyday and pay for services and wages. This revenue that they acquire comes from YOUR TAX DOLLARS----the Federal Grants. When this information was brought to the federal judges attention she ignored it and so did all of the government depts.
WHY put out an Executive Order if no one is going to honor it.
Judicial Complaints were filed...the Judiciary Hearing Committee IGNORES the complaints. George W. Bush has copies of the complaints and ignores it.................WELCOME TO THE BANANA REPUBLIC!!!!!
Posted by: Josephine S. Lovoi | Sep 8, 2006 12:49:20 PM
Are you serious? Is this what journalism has degraded itself to. Conjuring up "potential terror threats"? I didn't know ABC was on the Bush administration's payroll. Bunch of lapdogs!!
Posted by: Steve Chapman | Sep 8, 2006 12:49:48 PM
Wow...you guys are idiots! Why don't you just call the terrorists and tell them how your report went. Here's a headline...."ABC GIVES TERROIST ATTACK PLANS" Nice work ABC....great network.
Posted by: jk | Sep 8, 2006 12:55:19 PM
This doesn't surprise me. The authorities let homeless people sleep in the park and lay in the streets around K street (CVS and other supply trucks come in and park for hours)...around MacPherson Square...in front and a block away from the White House, no one checks and there is not enough security to stop a quick hit - like running a truck fast through the park to the White House...We are no where near ready!!
Posted by: Edith | Sep 8, 2006 12:55:52 PM
NICE WORK ABC. SOMEONE HAS TO WATCHDOG THE THE EMPTY LEGISLATION COMING OUT OF WASHINGTON, AS WELL AS, THE LEGISALTION BEING SHELVED WHICH WAS EAR-MARKED FOR U.S. PROTECTION. CONGRESS TALKS FROM BOTH SIDES OF ITS MOUTH.
Posted by: RAY ILLUMINATI | Sep 8, 2006 1:05:02 PM
Thanks Brian. It's not like the govenment and law officals have enough things to worry about and you're going to show the terrorist our weak points. Why don't you tell the police? We don't need to know this! Who is paying your salary? It needs to be spent on something worth while. I'm embarrassed to know you are an American reporter.
Posted by: Rich | Sep 8, 2006 1:06:44 PM
Wake up call? To purchase fertilizer? Go back to reporting on drunk celebs if this is what you call news.
Posted by: skidog | Sep 8, 2006 1:09:21 PM
Bri', you da man, man!
We need to know this so we can jump our reps all up in there.
It's not enough that they know this is happening; they need to know that WE know, too, and that, if WE know, they won't get away with knowing and hoping it will go away.
You da man, man!
Posted by: Bob | Sep 8, 2006 1:12:28 PM
Is this news? Why don't you put up a flag, "Hay Bad Guys, This Is How You Do It"
Posted by: Lee | Sep 8, 2006 1:14:12 PM
Bri', you da man, man!
We need to know this so we can jump our reps all up in there.
It's not enough that they know this is happening; they need to know that WE know, too, and that, if WE know, it may come back to haunt them.
You da man, man!
Posted by: Bob | Sep 8, 2006 1:14:13 PM
I agree. It seems a little too much like yellow journalism. Unfortunately though, that is what Americans respond to in the news. Gone are the days when Americans come home from work to engage in a critical review of the world's events. Between the 10-hour days at work, family obligations, financial concerns, long commutes, and a complete absence of an education system that encourages individuals to take responsibility for understanding the underlying issues in the world today (remember the MSNBC poll where not even half of Americans could find LA and Iraq on a map), the vast majority of Americans do not have the time or energy to “tune in” for an hour to take command of the issues of the day. In fact, I believe that the majority of Americans who do watch the news do so for the entertainment value. So, in line with these observations, Brian Ross's “scenario development” is of value. It entertains Americans and, in some instances, it will lead Americans to engage in conversations at work and school about one of the critical issues we face as a nation: national security. I imagine that many Americans then will express anger and belief to their friends and family. But, will they seize upon those emotions and take the responsibility to engage themselves in the decision-making process that establishes our policies and laws pertaining to them? If history is any indication, I imagine that they won't - they will instead blame the delegated leaders that made those decisions on their behalf and look to a new Congress (whether Republican or Democrat) to do a better job. I only hope that we will not “become ignorant and degenerate into a
populace that (is) incapable of exercising (our) sovereignty,” as James Monroe so wonderfully put it.
Posted by: agincourt | Sep 8, 2006 1:14:19 PM
LOTS of things can be used to make explosives. Care to guess how many gallons of gasoline or LP are even closer to the White House than your fertilizer? As John Stossel would say . . "Gimme a break." Why do journalists feel compelled to create paranoia over things completely uncontrollable. Shouldn't it be obvious by now that no amount of chest pounding legislation can protect us 100% of the time . . STOP TRYING GET GET MORE USELESS LAWS PASSED BY DRUMMING UP DRAMA.
Posted by: Dave | Sep 8, 2006 1:25:16 PM
So....what you're basically doing is showing the wackos of the world how to attack/bomb us? Hey, great job.
Posted by: Roger | Sep 8, 2006 1:25:25 PM
Edith, someone could rob your house tonight. Will you be ready? Where's your security? We cannot and never will be ready for every act of violence against the US. If you want to stop a pot of water from boiling, you don't insulate it from the heat. You turn off the gas.
Posted by: Steve | Sep 8, 2006 1:32:24 PM
..so should we be worried that a terrorist might blow up a storage shed a few miles from the White House and the Capital Building? ...this is investigative reporting? Gimme a break, Brian.
Posted by: Tom | Sep 8, 2006 1:35:41 PM
You should have ponied up and tried moving the "bomb" making supplies with in a half mile of the white house. Then Brian Ross could have given his full investigative report from behind bars.
Posted by: Brandon | Sep 8, 2006 1:44:04 PM
You obviously are missing the point about this report. This shows that if ABC can purchase bomb material without questions, then terrorists already know about this and who knows if they already haven't done so.
Posted by: dan | Sep 8, 2006 1:44:45 PM
Awesome, this proves that the Bush Administration's talke that they have made our Country so much safer since 911 is political b.s. God help us all!
Posted by: Elizabeth | Sep 8, 2006 1:45:05 PM
Journalism at it's finest. What a joke. Next time ABC, please try to think of safer ways to sell your news stories.
Posted by: Mike | Sep 8, 2006 1:46:46 PM
Post a comment
