BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Judges Must Disclose Free Trips
September 19, 2006 6:39 PM
In a major change in policy, federal judges must now disclose detailed information about who pays for their travel and expenses while attending educational seminars.
The change, announced today by the Federal Judicial Conference, follows a series of critical studies and news reports about federal judges accepting trips from corporate sponsors or interest groups.
Just last year questions were raised in a Nightline report about a trip to Colorado for Associate Justice Antonin Scalia to attend a seminar sponsored by the Federalist Society.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
"The Judicial Conference today made great strides toward preserving the public's confidence in our judiciary," said Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), who has been on the forefront of congressional efforts for judicial ethics reform over the years. "I applaud their actions aimed at improving how federal judges comply with their ethical obligations."
Under the new rules, federal judges would now be required to report within 30 days not only financial details but the speakers and topics presented at the conference.
The new disclosure information will be made available to the public on the internet by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.
"These are very significant changes," said Doug Kendall of the Counsel of the Community Rights organization, which issued several reports critical of judicial travel. "The Conference went further than I expected. It is an important step forward in providing real-time disclosure and transparency for litigants around the country."
It's not yet clear whether the rules will apply to Supreme Court Justices who in the past have said they were not bound by rules set for lower court justices.
Click here to read the new rules applying to federal judges.
September 19, 2006 | Permalink | User Comments (3)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The Supreme Court Justices should be held to an even Higher Stander when it comes to Ethics. How can that even be a question?
Posted by: Patti Conard | Sep 20, 2006 9:04:37 AM
Wow.... a public pork bill spending disclosure database by Senators Coburn and Obama, now a public disclosure of judiciary spending and special interest groups sponsered trips.......
How do you top that for the week..??
Gosh.. I wonder if this is an election year......
Posted by: dreek | Sep 20, 2006 3:05:08 PM
I miss Bob Woodruff of ABC News. Where can I find an update?
(Please see our "The World Newser" blog. Lee Woodruff has recently left a note for us there. The Moderator)
Posted by: Charles | Sep 22, 2006 3:13:54 AM
Post a comment
