« Previous | Main | Next »

Lobbyists Resisting 9/11 Security Upgrades

September 11, 2006 11:58 AM

Fertilizer_logo3_nrLobbyists for farmers, retailers and television station owners are fighting a wide range of proposed laws to improve security and recommendations from the 9/ll Commission.

"It's really, frankly, a damning testimony about the system and the influence of special interests here in Washington," says Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), who is particularly upset with broadcasters.

The 9/ll Commission recommended a portion of the broadcast frequency used by television stations be turned over to emergency first responders next year.  The broadcasters, including ABC, want to stick to a previously planned date of 2009.

"Why are we waiting to save lives?" asked McCain in a report to be broadcast on a special ABC News program this evening. The broadcasters are literally "putting lives at risk," McCain said.

The broadcasters say viewers turn to them during emergencies for critical information, and at least 75 stations would lose a significant number of viewers who have no cable and whose televisions are not digital-ready if forced to abandon their frequencies before 2009. 

Other proposed security improvements include a federal law requiring background checks and registration of anyone buying ammonium nitrate, a chemical fertilizer that can also serve as a devastating bomb-making material.

The chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rep. Pete King (R-NY), tells ABC News that lobbyists for the American Farm Bureau have blocked the proposal.

"I think they are making a mistake of not seeing the impact this has on the country and the world as a whole," King told ABC News.

Ammonium nitrate, widely available at farm stores, used by terrorists worldwide, most recently in the bombs placed on trains this summer in Mumbai, India.

An ABC News undercover investigation found strangers with cash could easily acquire lethal quantities of ammonium nitrate, with virtually no questions asked.

King says he was forced to accept a watered-down version of his bill because of the Farm Bureau opposition that background checks would be an unfair burden on farmers. "I'll tell you, I wish it was stronger," King said.

In yet another example of the power of special interests, lobbyists for major retailers, including Wal-Mart, are fighting against proposals that would require l00 percent of shipping containers be inspected for possible radiological or nuclear material.

The retailers say they have improved their own internal security, and inspecting their containers would needlessly delay the delivery of foreign goods to store shelves.

"This is a classic case of commerce trumping conscience and security," said Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA), who is sponsoring the legislation.

Click here to go to the Brian Ross homepage, where you can watch a preview of the undercover investigation.

September 11, 2006 | Permalink | User Comments (82)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

This is a misleading report. The lobbyists on which you report, cannot block legislation. Only the elected officals can block these proposed laws. If they wanted to enact these restrictions, they could. The question is if they have the courage to do it.

Posted by: Jeff Shafer | Sep 11, 2006 5:09:58 PM

re: ocean shipping container inspection ...

Congress has been previously presented with workable comprehensive inspection plan, during open hearings headed in part by S.Biden.

The plan was being implemented overseas as joint Government / NGO operation at the time of the Hearings and Testmony, but would be already in operation (for a year or so) as a model at Singapore's or Hongkong's ocean ports, i forget which.

Costs for the plan & inspections are paid for (to regulators) entirely by the Shipping comunity, as they have incentive of thier "inspected" containers recieving expedited treatment.

Apparently the Admin. & Congress choose to not follow thru on this. Are we supprised? pffffft

Posted by: Mango | Sep 11, 2006 5:46:53 PM

Terrorist Attacks ... War On Terrorism ... Pass another Law to prevent ...

As long as these moronic concepts are perpetuated, the RETALIATION by both sides will continue to get worse.

Until gov. leaders, media, & public get thier tumbs out of thier anus's, and deal with the underlying motivations, there will continue to be murder & destruction in the name of freedom (on both sides, and by both sides).

(the next 20 pages of comment omited to save bandwidth)

Posted by: mango | Sep 11, 2006 6:24:56 PM

Since when do lobbyists block legislation? Our representatives are blocking the legislation because they work for the people lining their pockets not the people that hired/voted them into their position.

Posted by: Boo Man | Sep 11, 2006 7:04:56 PM

This seems to be typical of Washington politics and our society, as a whole, everytime there is some sort of disaster, no matter where, it ALWAYS comes down to the $$$$$$$. Look at New Orleans and Katrina. Putting a price on human life is dispicable and shameful.

Posted by: james A. Powroznik | Sep 11, 2006 7:21:14 PM

so, brain ross works for the lobbists on the otherside of the farm industry???

Posted by: ravin black | Sep 11, 2006 8:02:23 PM

As always a do nothing congress what else is there to say????

Posted by: Keith | Sep 11, 2006 10:26:20 PM

Obviously, Clark was an ABC consultant on your film. He certainly made sure HE was shown in a good light in the fight against terrorism on the Path to 9/11 film. This certainly was not an unbiased view. Was he that visable in the decisions on National Security? I doubt it.

Posted by: Kay Binzer | Sep 11, 2006 10:27:54 PM

I agree with Mango but extend it to everyone in the world. We all need to grow up and get along.

Posted by: Jessica Hayes | Sep 11, 2006 10:33:34 PM

After the total systemic failures within the US government, the failures to immediately implement the 9/11 Report's Recommendations, and the foolish redirection of US forces from Afghanistan to Iraq, I'm scared like on the date 9/11/01.
Why does our government take so long to do anything? The government would take more than five years just to ship an empty paper box across the street!

Posted by: Stanley | Sep 11, 2006 10:40:15 PM

I am pleased to see a major news outlet telling the truth without taking sides. i have had a hard time watching news and believing what is being said as being the truth

Posted by: gary spellman | Sep 11, 2006 10:42:49 PM

I would like to comment on The Path to 9/11, and the 9/11 commisions report. I just think that it's time to stop the blame game. It's time to take the facts learned and implement them so that 9/11 doesn't happen again, and I'm scared that it will. It doesn't matter if you are Republican, Democrat or anything in between the plain and simple truth is that if you were an American you, and everything that this County is based on was attacked. How did this country get so far away from the patriotism we felt, closeness to our neighbors, and unified spirit for our fellow citizens and allies right after 9/11 to where we are now? How did we get to the point where we are trying to lay blame on Our Presidents and Our Leaders for something that radical beasts did? Just remember who were the ones that did this to us...

Posted by: Laura | Sep 11, 2006 10:44:01 PM

I watched the "docudrama" with an open mind... and from the perspective of having worked in the region for the past 15 years, including Iraq. My conclusion is "no confidence" with too much bias and non-accuracies. For shame to the memory of those who died in the attacks and the subsequent adventures.

Posted by: Jact | Sep 11, 2006 10:48:32 PM

As long as Republican lawmakers are in power, no one should be suprised that they act in the best interests of corporate America. Move along, nothing to be concerned about here. Baaaaaahhhh

Posted by: Bryce | Sep 11, 2006 10:50:11 PM

I am in utter shock... that 5 years after this devastating attack.....MONEY is always more important than HUMAN LIFE!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Chayanne | Sep 11, 2006 10:59:29 PM

The politics in this country is as thick as the smoke that covered Manhatthan on that tragic day. We are back to the blame game again and there needs to be more Indians instead as many chiefs. You cannot protect this country behind a desk in Washington. I have even had an Arabian doctor tell me that americans are ingnorant on how to protect themselves and there country. This individual is sitting on our soil and telling us this. Why are the people that dropped the ball on 9/11 still in office. Sometimes it take someone to not be so politically correct to save lives.

Posted by: Rob/EMS | Sep 11, 2006 11:00:40 PM

You make a point that "corporate America" is blocking security steps, but fail to mention the efforts of liberal senators, like my own Russ Feingold, to halt efforts to intercept international calls by known terror suspects, while the media supports those efforst by calling the work "domestic spying." THAT is a much more deliberate act of blockage than a corporate lobby effort!

Posted by: Robert Marsh | Sep 11, 2006 11:05:59 PM

I cannot believe that the reasons we are not safe, still comes down to $$$. Oh, It cannot happen again! I have heard this said!!! Don't blame the people at the bottom!! Blame the ones at the top!! We as American need to make the people we elect remember what "We the people" means. If you can't do the job we will vote you out!!! The rich need to understand that "we are the people" and we are the who suffer the most. How money is enough for you??? Remember God is watching you!! You cannot take it with you!!

Posted by: JC | Sep 11, 2006 11:08:28 PM

Since when can lobbyists block legislation? Blame the lawmakers who fear not getting re-elected more than terrorist attacks.

Posted by: Mike Rodi | Sep 11, 2006 11:09:07 PM

Two-term limits for Congress are long past due. They will greatly reduce the effect of lobbyists and produce far more beneficial legislation.

Two terms have worked well for the President. They can do even better for the House and Senate.

Two terms are ample. Get in, get done what you came to do, and make room for someone with fresh ideas.

That won't give time to get ensnared in lobbyists' payoffs and other unethical practises that plague 'career' politicians.

Posted by: R McCracken | Sep 11, 2006 11:14:37 PM

Post a comment