« Previous | Main | Next »

Foley Cruising in His BMW; Another Dorm Visit in 2000

October 11, 2006 11:33 AM

Foley_ap_061002_nr_1A staff supervisor at the dorm for congressional pages intervened when former Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL) tried to pay the teens a nighttime visit in the summer of 2000, ABC News has learned.

The pages were having an informal "mixer" party in their dorm at the Tip O'Neil building behind the Capitol, according to a former page who was 17 at the time.

"It was a beautiful summer evening, and I recall Mr. Foley arriving in his blue Series 3 BMW convertible about 9:30 at night," the former page said. "Several of us saw him and went outside to chat."

A page program supervisor came out to warn the pages "not to go far because they weren't signed out" and shooed them back inside, he recalled.

The page supervisor was one of the adult staffers who worked for the House Clerk's office, which oversees the page program.  It is not known if any formal report was filed regarding Foley's surprise visit.
   
The former page, who spoke to ABC News on the condition he not be identified, said he then began receiving instant messages and e-mails from Foley which became sexually explicit immediately following his 18th birthday.

He said he has not retained any of the messages or e-mails.

"I would turn on my instant messenger, and he would be online at all hours of the day or night. The talk would quickly turn sexual," he said. He says Foley requested that he send photos of himself performing sexual acts.

According to Newsweek Magazine, it was the report of a similar nighttime visit by an inebriated Foley to the page dorm sometime in 2002 or 2003 that caused Foley's then Chief of Staff, Kirk Fordham, to alert Speaker Hastert's office to the congressman's inappropriate actions, a warning Hastert's office now says they never received.

October 11, 2006 in Mark Foley Internet Scandal | Permalink | User Comments (100)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

That is frightening. A true predator circling around his prey. I would be ticked if I were the parents of these pages.

Posted by: Newzhound | Oct 11, 2006 11:42:00 AM

Alright already. Heard enough. when you have some facts and the man is in jail it will be another story to write about. Until then its is DEAD.

Posted by: David | Oct 11, 2006 11:47:32 AM

Strange bmw ideas... hope that they better upgrades their cars :(

Posted by: revan | Oct 11, 2006 11:49:21 AM

Has anyone ask Speaker Hastert when he first became aware of Follie's night time visits to the Page Dorm?

Posted by: Stephen Dulaney | Oct 11, 2006 12:19:29 PM

i m not for petafier, but i would like to know how law can charge a under 17 as a adult for a craim but when is sexual she he, are chidren,not adult.

Posted by: dene | Oct 11, 2006 12:30:38 PM

Dene: This may be difficult for a "petafier" to understand but before a minor is charged as an adult they must be cerified as an adult by the court system. I don't know if it would work this way, but before you decide to have sex with a minor, maybe you could have a judge certify them as an adult for you. I think that would go over quite well, ehh?

Posted by: Henk | Oct 11, 2006 12:48:32 PM

Bush's crazy belief that because he says it makes it so is clearly contagious. David, above, thinks he can declare Foley/Hastert/Reynolds/Boehner/Simkus-gate dead, when it's just begun. I can't wait to see how many of the Party of Nixon are removed from office by this!

Posted by: Keith Gore Wiseman | Oct 11, 2006 12:49:52 PM

Not sure what the individual "dene" is saying, since that is not clearly English, but Foley did not engage in pedophilia, number one, it was ephebophilia. There is a difference, psychologically and according to the DSM-IV, which is used by psych professionals to assist in the diagnoses of psychoses. Number two, the age of consent in DC is 16 years old, not 17, and not 18. That, therefore, suggests that this whole scandal has little to do with sex and more to do with harassment and predation.

Posted by: Steve | Oct 11, 2006 12:55:03 PM

I think they should do away with the pages altogether. Let the congressmen/women do their own running around (for work issues) not cruising for sex. They make waaay too much for doing waaay too little anyway! And no, it's not enough already. It will NEVER be enough - that why this country is a mess - because of attitudes like yours!

Posted by: linda h. | Oct 11, 2006 12:57:00 PM

Steve - good post. And you're right - the issue is harassment, not sex.

Posted by: Kate | Oct 11, 2006 1:01:49 PM

Regardless of whether it was strictly illegal, it was certainly predatory behavior by a House member that proclaimed to be protecting children, as well as a member of a party that continuously stands on a pedestal of supposed moral superiority.

This whole thing - including the obvious conspiratorial coverups - shows them for the "party-first-constituent-second" hypocrits that they are. Whether or not anyone goes to jail for this, the damage is done, and the voters will not be fooled by self-serving legal minutiae. In fact - it will alienate them further.

When in a hole, the first thing to do is stop digging...

Posted by: BobR | Oct 11, 2006 1:06:20 PM

Much is being said of the age-0f-consent in the DC. Is the age-of-consent in DC only for residents of the district or for visitors as well? Foley is a resident of Florida. The boys he was involved with were residents of other states. Some state age-of-consent laws apply not only to acts committed within its boundaries but also acts committed by its residents when outside the state.

What of the Mann Act? (In 1910, Congress passed the Mann Act which makes it a federal crime to transport individuals under the age of 18 across state lines to engage in any sexual activity.) Did Foley, through his congressional position, have any input into the selection of pages? If so, could he not be charged with a violation. The original intent of the law was to stop prostitutes from being moved from one locale to another. It now also applies to an adult taking a *consensual* minor to another state. Penalties can include being fined for $5,000, or imprisoned for 5 years, or both. The penalty could be doubled if a minor is involved.

Posted by: DWL | Oct 11, 2006 1:08:20 PM

I am still trying to figure out how Bill Clinton can be made to be responsible for Foley-gate. So far, Bushies have put 9/11 and North Korea in his lap, ignoring that Condi DID attend that urgent meeting with the CIA (even though she "forgot"--key to success in the Bush Whitehouse). Furthermore, Donnie (Worst Sec of Defense in History) Rumsfield was on the BOARD of the company that sold the reactors to N. Korea. When the world is in peril, let's keep in mind that ALL ROADS LEAD BACK TO RUMSFELD, not Clinton.

"Keep Pervy Republican Mitts off Our Kids--Vote Democrat"

Posted by: Dave | Oct 11, 2006 1:09:52 PM

ANSWER TO DENE: WHEN YOU COMMIT A CRIME YOU VIOLATE OTHERS RIGHTS, THEREFORE YOU ARE ACTING MORE LIKE (SHAMEFULLY) ADULTS DO, ESP WHEN IT IS MURDER AND MAIMING. WHEN YOU ARE CHILD VICTIM, YOU SHOULD RECEIVE YOUR FULL RIGHTS AS A MINOR TO PROTECT YOU. SIMPLE ENOUGH. FOLEY IS A PREDATOR AND A PEDOPHILE, FAR DIFFERENT FROM HOMOSEXUAL, AND WITHOUT A DOUBT HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN STOPPED LONG AGO, BUT THEN THEY ALL SHOULD HAVE, SPEAK OUT FOLKS AND PERHAPS IT WILL STOP. WE CAN GET CELL PHONES THAT REPORT THEIR OWN THEFT, SURELY WE CAN TEACH OUR CHILDREN TO REPORT PREDATORY BEHAVIOR BEFORE THEY ARE ROBBED OF THEIR YOUTH. ACT NOW. TURN IN A CREEP TODAY!

Posted by: LORA C | Oct 11, 2006 1:11:48 PM

The real story is the cover up by closeted GOP members. This story has a long way to go. Most gays in DC know the real story.

Posted by: fat Karl | Oct 11, 2006 1:11:59 PM

Ephebophilia or pedophilia he is still a threat to kids. 16 the age of consent, really?? This is just crazy, 16 is a rough time for most kids emotionally and physically and that sicko preyed on that.

Posted by: Laura | Oct 11, 2006 1:12:32 PM

Foley represent the real Gop's family values: rotten hypocrites-bleached tombs

Posted by: feo | Oct 11, 2006 1:14:04 PM

Okay, don't care what age consent is, bottom line: this party of morals and individuality ignored what was happening... in this country, the US of A, if you are under 18, you aren't an adult... lets just wait and see how this plays out after Nov 7. Once thing is for sure, the republicans got screwed by Foley; and yeah, If I were a Dem, I'd be playing hardball and milkin' this for all it's worth!

Posted by: Goldhooka | Oct 11, 2006 1:15:16 PM

after a hard day of making the government smaller and raising your own salary as self congratulation, what hard working congressman wouldn't want to have a sexual fling with a minor of your preferred sex that you ostensibly have responsibility for?

Posted by: dave weeiss | Oct 11, 2006 1:16:41 PM

Foley is a sick sick old man. For some Republicans to make light of Foley's predatory ways (just because the pages could be 16 or 17 or 18)is truly disgusting. More disgusting because the Republicans present such "squeaky" clean image about themselves, always self-righteous. Foley has behaved horribly and the Republicans should just admit it.

Posted by: M. Stratas | Oct 11, 2006 1:17:52 PM

Post a comment